노인종합복지관 사회복지사의 인권민감성과 노인인권 인식에 관한 연구 = A Study on the consciousness about the elder's human rights and sensitivity about human rights of social worker worked at welfare facility for aged

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 노인종합복지관 사회복지사들이 사회적으로 소외된 노인들의 인권보장을 위한 노인복지 실천의 주요 주체가 되어야 한다는 인식을 가진다. 노인인권 인식에 관련한 실증적 연구가 전무한 상태이기 때문에 대표적인 노인복지 전문기관인 노인종합복지관의 사회복지사를 대상으로 인권민감성과 노인인권 인식 수준이 어떠한지, 인권민감성과 노인인권 인식수준에 있어 특성별로 어떠한 차이가 있는지, 인권민감성과 노인인권 인식수준 간에는 어떠한 관계가 있는지를 알아보고자 하였다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Despite the fact that elderly welfare for elderly human rights are increasingly important, there are no empirical research about the consciousness of elder's human rights. In terms of this, social workers should be the main subject for elderly human rights, especially socially disadvantaged. For this purpose, this study was examined in order to investigate the relationship with human rights sensibility and the level of consciousness about the elderly human rights, including what differences between each factors by characteristics.
The participants in this study were one-hundred and six social workers from seventeen senior welfare centers located in Seoul and Gyeonggi area. Data was analyzed by frequency analysis, descriptive statistics and ANOVA using SPSS 12.0 for window.
The major findings and implications are as follow. First, human rights sensibility was low(M=2.45, SD=1.81), but responsibility perception(M=2.52), which is subcategory of human rights sensibility, was higher than result perception(M=2.46) and situational perception(M=2.35). This result means that social workers are more sensitive to responsibility perception which is closely related to human rights behaviors. Next, they were seriously concerned about violation of elderly human rights and human right situation both inside and outside of senior welfare center. The acceptance of elderly human right(M=4.36, SD=0.486) and the level of involvement in elderly human rights(M=4.36, SD=0.486) were high. Second, there were differences about human rights sensibility and the level of consciousness about elderly human rights by each characteristics. Specifically, depending on the position at workplace showed significantly different in human rights sensibility(F=3.985, p<0.01), and experienced more education about elderly human rights showed higher human rights sensibility but it was not significantly different. Depending on the working conditions of social workers, identity of work performance(F=2.917, p<0.05), violation human rights from subjects(F=4.043, p<0.01), and employees community configuration(F=3.630, p<0.01) showed significant differences in human rights sensibility. Next, it verified the difference about demographic characteristic, experience of elderly human rights education, and working condition of social workers in perception of elderly human rights. As a result of that, social workers who have seven to nine total working experience(F=2.554, p<0.05) and/or working experience in senior welfare center (F=2.560, p<0.05) were more seriously conscious about human rights situation both inside and outside of senior welfare center. Also, they had more higher sens of violation of elderly human rights when they are women and get a higher salary. In addition to this, the experience of elderly human rights education was affected to violation and acceptance of elderly human rights, and the level of consciousness about elderly human rights showed significantly difference by working condition of social workers. Third, when the human rights sensibility was higher, the level of consciousness about elderly human rights high, and when violation of elderly human rights was higher, the social workers were more seriously conscious about human rights inside and outside of senior welfare center. It also revealed that social workers were considered about acceptance of elderly human rights when they were planning a service and support, this results were reflected by the importance of elderly welfare practice.
This study suggests fundamental data about elderly human rights in absence of previous study about human rights sensibility and the perception of elderly human rights. In particular, this study showed practical implications in terms of human rights practice as protect and promote elderly human rights based on elderly welfare practice in senior welfare centers.













Key words : senior welfare center, human rights sensibility, elder's human rights, consciousness of elder's human rights

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목 차
• 제1장 서 론
• 제1절 연구의 필요성
• 제2절 연구의 목적
• 제2장 이론적 배경
• 제1절 노인종합복지관의 이해
• 1. 노인종합복지관의 역사와 현황
• 2. 노인종합복지관의 개념 및 조직구조
• 3. 노인종합복지관의 주요 사업
• 4. 노인종합복지관 사회복지사의 업무특성
• 제2절 인권과 인권민감성의 개념
• 1. 인권의 개념
• 2. 인권민감성의 개념
• 제3절 노인인권의 이해
• 1. 노인인권의 개념과 영역
• 2. 노인인권에 관한 국제원칙과 계획
• 제4절 인권민감성과 노인인권 인식 관련 요인
• 제3장 연구방법
• 제1절 연구문제
• 1. 연구모형
• 2. 연구가설
• 제2절 연구설계
• 1. 연구대상
• 2. 자료수집 방법
• 3. 측정도구
• 4. 자료분석 방법
• 제4장 연구결과
• 제1절 조사대상자의 일반적 특성
• 1. 조사대상자의 인구사회학적 특성
• 2. 노인인권 교육경험
• 3. 사회복지사의 근무여건 인지
• 제2절 사회복지사의 인권민감성과 노인인권인식 분석
• 1. 사회복지사의 인권민감성 분석
• 2. 사회복지사의 노인인권 인식 분석
• 제3절 인권민감성과 노인인권 인식의 특성별 차이 분석
• 1. 인권민감성의 특성별 차이분석
• 1) 인구사회학적 특성에 따른 인권민감성 정도
• 2) 노인인권 교육경험에 따른 인권민감성 정도
• 3) 근무여건에 따른 인권민감성 정도
• 2. 노인인권 인식의 특성별 차이분석
• 1) 인구사회학적 특성에 따른 노인인권 인식 수준의 차이
• 2) 노인인권 교육경험에 따른 노인인권 인식수준
• 3) 근무여건에 따른 노인인권 인식수준 차이
• 제4절 인권민감성과 노인인권 인식수준간의 상관관계 분석
• 제5장 결론 및 제언
• 제1절 연구결과 요약
• 제2절 연구의 함의
• 제3절 연구의 한계 및 제언
• 참고문헌
• 부록(설문지)
• Abstract