RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    의미관계를 활용한 어휘지도 방안 : 초등학교 중급학년을 대상으로 = Methodological Research for Teaching vocabulary : For the forth grade of elementary school

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12131076

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The present study amis to investigate the effects of methodology of teaching vocabulary using pragmatic relations for 4th grade of elementary school students whose curriculum contains much increased amount of vocabulary items compared to the previous years, 1st to 3rd grades.
    The research questions are formulated as following:
    1. What are the appropriate vocabulary for the students in 4th grade.
    2. How can teach the students the words using sematic relation.
    3. Will be the vocabulary instruction using sematic relation effective?
    As for the procedure, first of all, the target vocabulary items were selected based on Choi, U-C& Kim, K-H(2009), and then the pragmatic relations were constructed among those words. Based on the construction of words with pragmatic relations, teaching plan was designed and was implemented six-week instruction period. The effects of vocabulary teaching using pramatic relation were examined during the six-week teaching session.
    The process of instruction went as follow: step 1: activating students' background knowledge(schemata), step 2: assuming the sematic relation and confirming, and step 3: internalizing. As for the specific activities for step 2. students could assume the sematic relations and confirm them through visualized material and Korean dictionary website, Nurijib(http://www.wordnet.co.kr). and Also, in step 3, students could increase the vocabulary items and internalize them through writing essay and composing stories.
    The students are in two groups; experimental group and control group. The students in the experimental group were instructed for 18 hours of classes for 6 weeks in which vocabulary instruction using pragmatic relation was implemented, while no such instruction using pragmatic relation was implemented in the control group. As a result, the results showed that students in experimental group increased 5.22 in vocabulary comprehension test, and increased 8.19 in the vocabulary usage test. On the other hand, the control group showed that 0.11 decreased in test of vocabulary comprehension test and 0.13 decreased in vocabulary usage test. These results were statiscally significant. The findings imply that using pragmatic relation is effective way in vocabulary instruction.
    In conclusion, the effective vocabulary instruction is not simple to discuss with several methods in the instruction. However, the present study is meaningful in terms of the fact that this study suggests one of the effective ways of vocabulary teaching for the intermediate grade(e.g.4th grade) in the elementary school.
    * A thesis submitted to the Committee of the Graduate School of Gyeong-sang University in partial fulfillment of requirement for degree of Master of Education in August, 2010
    번역하기

    The present study amis to investigate the effects of methodology of teaching vocabulary using pragmatic relations for 4th grade of elementary school students whose curriculum contains much increased amount of vocabulary items compared to the previous...

    The present study amis to investigate the effects of methodology of teaching vocabulary using pragmatic relations for 4th grade of elementary school students whose curriculum contains much increased amount of vocabulary items compared to the previous years, 1st to 3rd grades.
    The research questions are formulated as following:
    1. What are the appropriate vocabulary for the students in 4th grade.
    2. How can teach the students the words using sematic relation.
    3. Will be the vocabulary instruction using sematic relation effective?
    As for the procedure, first of all, the target vocabulary items were selected based on Choi, U-C& Kim, K-H(2009), and then the pragmatic relations were constructed among those words. Based on the construction of words with pragmatic relations, teaching plan was designed and was implemented six-week instruction period. The effects of vocabulary teaching using pramatic relation were examined during the six-week teaching session.
    The process of instruction went as follow: step 1: activating students' background knowledge(schemata), step 2: assuming the sematic relation and confirming, and step 3: internalizing. As for the specific activities for step 2. students could assume the sematic relations and confirm them through visualized material and Korean dictionary website, Nurijib(http://www.wordnet.co.kr). and Also, in step 3, students could increase the vocabulary items and internalize them through writing essay and composing stories.
    The students are in two groups; experimental group and control group. The students in the experimental group were instructed for 18 hours of classes for 6 weeks in which vocabulary instruction using pragmatic relation was implemented, while no such instruction using pragmatic relation was implemented in the control group. As a result, the results showed that students in experimental group increased 5.22 in vocabulary comprehension test, and increased 8.19 in the vocabulary usage test. On the other hand, the control group showed that 0.11 decreased in test of vocabulary comprehension test and 0.13 decreased in vocabulary usage test. These results were statiscally significant. The findings imply that using pragmatic relation is effective way in vocabulary instruction.
    In conclusion, the effective vocabulary instruction is not simple to discuss with several methods in the instruction. However, the present study is meaningful in terms of the fact that this study suggests one of the effective ways of vocabulary teaching for the intermediate grade(e.g.4th grade) in the elementary school.
    * A thesis submitted to the Committee of the Graduate School of Gyeong-sang University in partial fulfillment of requirement for degree of Master of Education in August, 2010

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 들머리 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적 3
    • 3. 연구의 방법 4
    • 4. 선행 연구 검토 4
    • Ⅰ. 들머리 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적 3
    • 3. 연구의 방법 4
    • 4. 선행 연구 검토 4
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 8
    • 1. 어휘력의 이론 8
    • 1) 개념 8
    • 2) 의의 9
    • 2. 어휘 지도·학습의 원리 10
    • Ⅲ. 현행 어휘지도의 실상 12
    • 1. 교육과정 12
    • 1) 내용 12
    • 2) 방법 14
    • 2. 교과서 15
    • 1) 내용 15
    • 2) 방법 17
    • 3. 현행 교육과정·교과서의 문제점 18
    • Ⅳ. 어휘지도의 방법 20
    • 1. 기존 방법의 검토 20
    • 2. 새로운 방안의 제시《의미관계를 활용하는 방안을 중심으로》 22
    • Ⅴ. 의미관계를 활용한 어휘지도 방안 28
    • 1. 의미관계 활용의 의의 28
    • 2. 지도대상 어휘의 선정과 구조화 29
    • 1) 어휘 선정 29
    • 2) 구조화 33
    • 3. 어휘지도의 실제 34
    • 1) 연구 대상 34
    • 2) 연구 과정 35
    • 3) 지도의 실제 38
    • 4) 결과 분석 41
    • Ⅵ. 마무리 44
    • 참 고 문 헌 47
    • 부 록 50
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼