RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    보편적 학습설계에 의한 과학 교수-학습 자료가 지적장애학생의 수업참여행동, 학업수행능력에 미치는 영향 = The effect of science teaching material based on the universal design for learning (UDL) on instruction participate behavior and performance aptitude of the student with intellectual disabilities

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12049416

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The effect of science teaching material
    based on the universal design for learning (UDL) on instruction participate behavior and performance aptitude of the student with intellectual disabilities

    Written by: You, Sun-Hae
    Department of Special Education
    Graduate School of Woosuk University
    Directed by: Prof. Chung, Jin-Ja Ph.D.

    <Abstract>
    The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of science teaching material based on Universal Design for Learning (UDL) on instruction participate behavior and performance aptitude of student with intellectual disabilities. One student with intellectual disabilities was selected as the research subject. The student is in an integrated grade 2 class at the B middle school of Iksan city in Jeollabuk province. The study was comprised of a total of 20 circuits and 3-4 sessions per week and was used 45 minutes per session. The results obtained are as follows:
    First, the science teaching material based on the universal design for learning revealed a positive impact on instruction participate behavior within the research subject.
    The incidence of average instruction participate behavior was low in the foundation period and rapidly increased during the intervention period. In the reversal foundation period, however, the incidence of average instruction participate behavior was lower than the intervention period while it was slightly higher than the foundation period. During the intervention period, the incidence of the average instruction participate behavior was higher than the foundation period in the order of responses to instructions, participations to specific materials, and performance tasks. 
    Second, the research subject was observed to have an increase in performance aptitude during exposure to the intervention material.
    The ratio of average task performance increased during the intervention period compared to the foundation period. A slight increase was as also observed during the reverse foundation period compared to the foundation period. In combination, these results indicate a positive effect of intervention on the student research subject.
    The limitations of this study are as follows:
    There are some concerns that should be noted in generalizing the current study to the school curriculum at large. The design of the study called for a single research subject. This feature of the study makes it difficult to provide any definitive statement regarding change; it is possible that any observed change could be due to a specific feature of the research subject.
    Second, it is difficult to confirm any external validity. The results of the instruction participate behavior and performance aptitude may not only be dependent upon the intervention used in this study.
    Based on the current results, the following recommendations are to be made.
    First, this study was designed to evaluate the effects of science teaching material based on UDL on instruction participate behavior and performance aptitude of a student with intellectual disabilities, therefore, a broader and more systematic study is required. This would be achieved by applying the UDL over the length and breadth of the science curriculum as well as other subjects in order to obtain generable results.
    Second, as this study was limited to instruction participate behavior and performance aptitude of a student with intellectual disabilities, a comparative analysis needs to be done with average students. Future research would also include a greater number of participants, which would enable an account of individual differences. Increasing the number of participants would also add the external validity of the study.


    번역하기

    The effect of science teaching material based on the universal design for learning (UDL) on instruction participate behavior and performance aptitude of the student with intellectual disabilities Written by: You, Sun-Ha...

    The effect of science teaching material
    based on the universal design for learning (UDL) on instruction participate behavior and performance aptitude of the student with intellectual disabilities

    Written by: You, Sun-Hae
    Department of Special Education
    Graduate School of Woosuk University
    Directed by: Prof. Chung, Jin-Ja Ph.D.

    <Abstract>
    The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of science teaching material based on Universal Design for Learning (UDL) on instruction participate behavior and performance aptitude of student with intellectual disabilities. One student with intellectual disabilities was selected as the research subject. The student is in an integrated grade 2 class at the B middle school of Iksan city in Jeollabuk province. The study was comprised of a total of 20 circuits and 3-4 sessions per week and was used 45 minutes per session. The results obtained are as follows:
    First, the science teaching material based on the universal design for learning revealed a positive impact on instruction participate behavior within the research subject.
    The incidence of average instruction participate behavior was low in the foundation period and rapidly increased during the intervention period. In the reversal foundation period, however, the incidence of average instruction participate behavior was lower than the intervention period while it was slightly higher than the foundation period. During the intervention period, the incidence of the average instruction participate behavior was higher than the foundation period in the order of responses to instructions, participations to specific materials, and performance tasks. 
    Second, the research subject was observed to have an increase in performance aptitude during exposure to the intervention material.
    The ratio of average task performance increased during the intervention period compared to the foundation period. A slight increase was as also observed during the reverse foundation period compared to the foundation period. In combination, these results indicate a positive effect of intervention on the student research subject.
    The limitations of this study are as follows:
    There are some concerns that should be noted in generalizing the current study to the school curriculum at large. The design of the study called for a single research subject. This feature of the study makes it difficult to provide any definitive statement regarding change; it is possible that any observed change could be due to a specific feature of the research subject.
    Second, it is difficult to confirm any external validity. The results of the instruction participate behavior and performance aptitude may not only be dependent upon the intervention used in this study.
    Based on the current results, the following recommendations are to be made.
    First, this study was designed to evaluate the effects of science teaching material based on UDL on instruction participate behavior and performance aptitude of a student with intellectual disabilities, therefore, a broader and more systematic study is required. This would be achieved by applying the UDL over the length and breadth of the science curriculum as well as other subjects in order to obtain generable results.
    Second, as this study was limited to instruction participate behavior and performance aptitude of a student with intellectual disabilities, a comparative analysis needs to be done with average students. Future research would also include a greater number of participants, which would enable an account of individual differences. Increasing the number of participants would also add the external validity of the study.


    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목 차
    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구 목적 3
    • 목 차
    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구 목적 3
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 4
    • 1. 지적장애학생의 학습특성과 학업수행능력 4
    • 2. 과학과 교육과정 비교 분석 7
    • 3. 보편적 학습설계 19
    • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 25
    • 1. 연구 대상 25
    • 2. 연구 설계 28
    • 3. 연구 도구 28
    • 4. 연구 절차 37
    • 5. 자료 처리 39
    • Ⅳ. 결과 및 해석 41
    • 1. 수업참여행동에 미치는 영향 41
    • 2. 학업수행능력에 미치는 영향 46
    • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 49
    • 참고문헌 51
    • 영문초록 55
    • 부 록 58
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼