RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    '이/가'와 '은/는'의 정보구조 이론적 연구 = A study on 'ka' and 'nun' based on Information structure theory

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12011968

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The thesis is based on information structure theory in order to explain how a sentence containing the marker 'ka' or 'nun' is constrained and how its meaning is differentiated depending on the contexts. For this purpose, firstly methods to be used in information structure analysis are clarified, and the information structure of korean is analyzed. Analyzing Korean information structure, the thesis verified that the meanings of genericity and contrastiveness are caused by information structure but not a mere meaning differences in the marker 'ka' and 'nun'. The thesis is organized as follows.
    Chapter 2 covers not only usefulness of 'given-ness' and 'about-ness' in analyzing information structure but also their limitation. Then, an argumentation is followed that 'given-ness' and 'about-ness' should be used in complementary manner to clarify the information structure. Futhermore, the three types of information structure in a sentence are examined : predicate-focus structure, argument-focus structure, and sentence-focus structure. Among these, the topic in argument-focus structure is regarded as 'open-proposition' and the topic in sentence-focus structure as 'stage topic' which is the scene on which the event is taking place.
    In chapter 3, information structure in Korean is analyzed. Although 'ka' does not independently indicate whether NPs marked by 'ka' are topic or focus, 'ka' influences information structure of the sentences containg 'ka'. To be specific, 'ka' should be used to mark sentential subject as a focus of argument-focus structure, whereas it is not used to mark topic in predicate-focus structure. Also, it supported the prior researches that 'nun' indicates topic. NPs marked by 'nun' are topic regardless of the place of it in a sentence. Moreover NPs marked by 'nun' are topic even though it implies a meaning of contrast. At the last part of chapter 3, information structure of Korean sentence are categorized into predicate-focus structure and aregument-focus structure.
    In chapter 4, information structure theory explained meanings of 'genericity' and 'contrastiveness' revealed in Korean sentences. First of all, information structure was used to interpret semantic meaning of genericity. Due to the different information structure caused by 'ka' and 'nun', the meaning of genericity in a sentence containing 'ka' differs from the meaning of genericity in a sentence containing 'nun'. Secondly, it was explained when NPs marked by 'ka' gets the meaning of exhaustiveness. NPs marked by 'ka' gets the meaning of it when both the sentence containing 'ka' is argument-focus structure, and NPs marked by 'ka' is a focus. Finally, the thesis covers the contrastive meaning caused by 'nun' is conversation implicature, since the topic introduced by 'nun' is not informative enough.
    번역하기

    The thesis is based on information structure theory in order to explain how a sentence containing the marker 'ka' or 'nun' is constrained and how its meaning is differentiated depending on the contexts. For this purpose, firstly methods to be used in ...

    The thesis is based on information structure theory in order to explain how a sentence containing the marker 'ka' or 'nun' is constrained and how its meaning is differentiated depending on the contexts. For this purpose, firstly methods to be used in information structure analysis are clarified, and the information structure of korean is analyzed. Analyzing Korean information structure, the thesis verified that the meanings of genericity and contrastiveness are caused by information structure but not a mere meaning differences in the marker 'ka' and 'nun'. The thesis is organized as follows.
    Chapter 2 covers not only usefulness of 'given-ness' and 'about-ness' in analyzing information structure but also their limitation. Then, an argumentation is followed that 'given-ness' and 'about-ness' should be used in complementary manner to clarify the information structure. Futhermore, the three types of information structure in a sentence are examined : predicate-focus structure, argument-focus structure, and sentence-focus structure. Among these, the topic in argument-focus structure is regarded as 'open-proposition' and the topic in sentence-focus structure as 'stage topic' which is the scene on which the event is taking place.
    In chapter 3, information structure in Korean is analyzed. Although 'ka' does not independently indicate whether NPs marked by 'ka' are topic or focus, 'ka' influences information structure of the sentences containg 'ka'. To be specific, 'ka' should be used to mark sentential subject as a focus of argument-focus structure, whereas it is not used to mark topic in predicate-focus structure. Also, it supported the prior researches that 'nun' indicates topic. NPs marked by 'nun' are topic regardless of the place of it in a sentence. Moreover NPs marked by 'nun' are topic even though it implies a meaning of contrast. At the last part of chapter 3, information structure of Korean sentence are categorized into predicate-focus structure and aregument-focus structure.
    In chapter 4, information structure theory explained meanings of 'genericity' and 'contrastiveness' revealed in Korean sentences. First of all, information structure was used to interpret semantic meaning of genericity. Due to the different information structure caused by 'ka' and 'nun', the meaning of genericity in a sentence containing 'ka' differs from the meaning of genericity in a sentence containing 'nun'. Secondly, it was explained when NPs marked by 'ka' gets the meaning of exhaustiveness. NPs marked by 'ka' gets the meaning of it when both the sentence containing 'ka' is argument-focus structure, and NPs marked by 'ka' is a focus. Finally, the thesis covers the contrastive meaning caused by 'nun' is conversation implicature, since the topic introduced by 'nun' is not informative enough.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Abstract ⅲ
    • 1. 서론 1
    • 1.1. 연구 목적과 대상 1
    • 1.2. 연구방법 3
    • 1.3. 선행 연구 5
    • Abstract ⅲ
    • 1. 서론 1
    • 1.1. 연구 목적과 대상 1
    • 1.2. 연구방법 3
    • 1.3. 선행 연구 5
    • 1.4. 논문의 구성 8
    • 2. 정보구조의 분석 10
    • 2.1. 정보구조 분석 방법 10
    • 2.1.1. 정보구조 분석의 대상 10
    • 2.1.2. 정보구조의 분석 기준: '주어짐-성'과 '대하여-성' 12
    • 2.2. 문장의 정보구조 분석 22
    • 2.2.1. 주제와 초점의 판별 22
    • 2.2.2. 문장의 정보구조 유형 27
    • 2.3. 요약 32
    • 3. 국어 문장의 정보구조 34
    • 3.1. 이/가와 은/는의 정보구조적 기능 34
    • 3.1.1. 이/가의 정보구조적 기능 34
    • 3.1.2. 은/는의 정보구조적 기능 41
    • 3.2. 국어 문장의 정보구조 유형 50
    • 3.2.1. 국어 문장에서 주제의 실현 51
    • 3.2.2. 국어 문장의 정보구조 분류 55
    • 3.3. 요약 62
    • 4. 정보구조와 문장의 의미 64
    • 4.1. 정보구조와 총칭성 65
    • 4.2. 이/가의 정보구조와 총망라성 75
    • 4.3. 은/는의 정보구조와 대조 함축 86
    • 4.4. 요약 93
    • 5. 결론 96
    • 참고문헌 99
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼