RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    결속현상에 대한 한국어 학습자의 통사제약 습득 연구 : 재귀대명사를 중심으로 = The L2 Acquisition of Syntactic Constraint on Reflexive Binding by Korean EFL Learners

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11918689

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study investigates how Korean adult learners of English acquire the English reflexives and whether their learning process is constrained by Universal Grammar(UG). Reflexives in English and in Korean have different syntactic properties. According to the effects of the Governing Category(GCP) and Proper Antecedent Parameter(PAP) from Welxler and Manzini(1987), Korean reflexives can be bound to both long-distance antecedents and local antecedents, whereas English reflexives must be bound to local antecedents only. Since the relevant parameter is different, when Korean learn English reflexives, the initial state of Korean learners may use Korean parametric value to interpret English reflexives. While they are being exposed to linguistic input for English, they finally learn the parametric value which the target language has.
    In order to examine how Korean EFL learners of English reset parameters of Korean reflexives to English reflexives, an experiment was performed in this study. The experimental group consisted of Korean learners of English at three different levels, 30 advanced level and 45 intermediate level students from university and graduate school, and 58 low level students from second grade in high school. Fifteen native speakers of English served as a control group. These subjects responded to a test on reflexives that used a grammaticality judgement task, and a truth value judgement task to mark true or flase on the potential antecedents of English reflexives. The result of this experiment shows that Korean L2 learners in low level transfer their L1 parameter setting and make errors in choice for correct answers on English reflexives. However, the result also shows evidence that the Korean L2 learners who gain more English proficiency to high level can reset the parameters of Korean reflexives to the English value.
    번역하기

    This study investigates how Korean adult learners of English acquire the English reflexives and whether their learning process is constrained by Universal Grammar(UG). Reflexives in English and in Korean have different syntactic properties. According ...

    This study investigates how Korean adult learners of English acquire the English reflexives and whether their learning process is constrained by Universal Grammar(UG). Reflexives in English and in Korean have different syntactic properties. According to the effects of the Governing Category(GCP) and Proper Antecedent Parameter(PAP) from Welxler and Manzini(1987), Korean reflexives can be bound to both long-distance antecedents and local antecedents, whereas English reflexives must be bound to local antecedents only. Since the relevant parameter is different, when Korean learn English reflexives, the initial state of Korean learners may use Korean parametric value to interpret English reflexives. While they are being exposed to linguistic input for English, they finally learn the parametric value which the target language has.
    In order to examine how Korean EFL learners of English reset parameters of Korean reflexives to English reflexives, an experiment was performed in this study. The experimental group consisted of Korean learners of English at three different levels, 30 advanced level and 45 intermediate level students from university and graduate school, and 58 low level students from second grade in high school. Fifteen native speakers of English served as a control group. These subjects responded to a test on reflexives that used a grammaticality judgement task, and a truth value judgement task to mark true or flase on the potential antecedents of English reflexives. The result of this experiment shows that Korean L2 learners in low level transfer their L1 parameter setting and make errors in choice for correct answers on English reflexives. However, the result also shows evidence that the Korean L2 learners who gain more English proficiency to high level can reset the parameters of Korean reflexives to the English value.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제 1 장 서론 = 1
    • 1.1 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 1.2 연구 내용 = 3
    • 제 2 장 이론적 배경 = 4
    • 2.1 제 2 언어 습득(Second Language Acquisition)과 보편문법(Universal Grammar) = 4
    • 제 1 장 서론 = 1
    • 1.1 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 1.2 연구 내용 = 3
    • 제 2 장 이론적 배경 = 4
    • 2.1 제 2 언어 습득(Second Language Acquisition)과 보편문법(Universal Grammar) = 4
    • 2.2 결속원리 A (Binding Principle A) = 6
    • 2.3 지배범주 매개변항(The Governing Category Parameter)과 적절한 선행사 매개변항(The Proper Antecedent Parameter) = 10
    • 2.4 부분집합원리(The Subset Principle)와 학습원리(Learnability) = 15
    • 2.5 영어와 한국어 재귀대명사의 특징 비교 = 18
    • 2.5.1 재귀대명사의 형태 = 18
    • 2.5.2 결속영역 = 20
    • 2.5.3 성분통어 = 23
    • 2.5.4 결속대상 = 25
    • 2.6 선행 연구 = 27
    • 2.6.1 Finer & Broselow (1986) = 27
    • 2.6.2 Thomas (1989/1991) = 28
    • 2.6.3 Hirakawa (1990) = 30
    • 제 3 장 실험 연구 = 33
    • 3.1 실험 목적 = 33
    • 3.2 실험 문제 및 가설 = 33
    • 3.3 실험 연구 대상 = 35
    • 3.4 실험 내용 및 방법 = 37
    • 제 4 장 연구 결과 및 논의 = 41
    • 4.1 결과 분석 = 41
    • 4.1.1 총점의 평균값 분석 = 41
    • 4.1.2 문장 유형별 평균값 분석 = 44
    • 4.1.2.1 실험 유형 1에 대한 결과 = 44
    • 4.1.2.2 실험 유형 2에 대한 결과 = 50
    • 4.1.2.3 실험 유형 3에 대한 결과 = 55
    • 4.1.2.4 실험 유형 4에 대한 결과 = 64
    • 4.1.2.5 전체 유형에 대한 결과 비교 = 72
    • 4.2 논의 = 74
    • 제 5 장 결 론 = 77
    • 참고 문헌 = 81
    • 부 록 = 85
    • ABSTRACT = 92
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼