A study was conducted to determine that how faculty members do practice instructional design activities, and compared those instructional design activities with stages of concern. A survey was distributed to 241 faculty members, returned 52 faculty me...
A study was conducted to determine that how faculty members do practice instructional design activities, and compared those instructional design activities with stages of concern. A survey was distributed to 241 faculty members, returned 52 faculty members, who asked to indicate stages of concern, how often they used 9 instructional design activities in their planning works, and why an instructional design activity was excluded from some their planning works.
The findings of this study were as follows; First, Faculty members' stages of concern were almost near to impact stage. 36 of the 52 faculty were impact stage, stages of concern was related teaching career, but positions, experience of faculty development program were not related. Second, a majority of Faculty members' do practiced instructional design activity in their usual planning activity. But instructional design practice was not related stages of concern, teaching career, positions, experience of faculty development program. Third, the major reason why or constraints that they didn't do practice instructional design activity were time, hardworking, unnecessary. Finally, based on the results, relations of stages of concern and instructional design practice were discussed and make implication for the faculty development of improve teaching.
Key words: concern of teaching, instructional design practice, professor's instructional design practice