RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    대학 교수의 수업에 대한 관심도와 수업설계 실행에 관한 연구 = Faculty members' concerns of teaching and instructional design practice

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11790387

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    A study was conducted to determine that how faculty members do practice instructional design activities, and compared those instructional design activities with stages of concern. A survey was distributed to 241 faculty members, returned 52 faculty members, who asked to indicate stages of concern, how often they used 9 instructional design activities in their planning works, and why an instructional design activity was excluded from some their planning works.
    The findings of this study were as follows; First, Faculty members' stages of concern were almost near to impact stage. 36 of the 52 faculty were impact stage, stages of concern was related teaching career, but positions, experience of faculty development program were not related. Second, a majority of Faculty members' do practiced instructional design activity in their usual planning activity. But instructional design practice was not related stages of concern, teaching career, positions, experience of faculty development program. Third, the major reason why or constraints that they didn't do practice instructional design activity were time, hardworking, unnecessary. Finally, based on the results, relations of stages of concern and instructional design practice were discussed and make implication for the faculty development of improve teaching.


    Key words: concern of teaching, instructional design practice, professor's instructional design practice
    번역하기

    A study was conducted to determine that how faculty members do practice instructional design activities, and compared those instructional design activities with stages of concern. A survey was distributed to 241 faculty members, returned 52 faculty me...

    A study was conducted to determine that how faculty members do practice instructional design activities, and compared those instructional design activities with stages of concern. A survey was distributed to 241 faculty members, returned 52 faculty members, who asked to indicate stages of concern, how often they used 9 instructional design activities in their planning works, and why an instructional design activity was excluded from some their planning works.
    The findings of this study were as follows; First, Faculty members' stages of concern were almost near to impact stage. 36 of the 52 faculty were impact stage, stages of concern was related teaching career, but positions, experience of faculty development program were not related. Second, a majority of Faculty members' do practiced instructional design activity in their usual planning activity. But instructional design practice was not related stages of concern, teaching career, positions, experience of faculty development program. Third, the major reason why or constraints that they didn't do practice instructional design activity were time, hardworking, unnecessary. Finally, based on the results, relations of stages of concern and instructional design practice were discussed and make implication for the faculty development of improve teaching.


    Key words: concern of teaching, instructional design practice, professor's instructional design practice

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
    • 2. 연구의 내용 2
    • 3. 연구의 제한점 3
    • II. 이론적 배경 4
    • I. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
    • 2. 연구의 내용 2
    • 3. 연구의 제한점 3
    • II. 이론적 배경 4
    • 1. 대학교수의 수업 향상을 위한 교수개발 4
    • 2. 국내외 교수학습센터의 교수개발 현황 5
    • 3. 대학에서의 수업설계 8
    • 4. 대학교수의 수업행위 또는 수업전문성의 발달 과정 10
    • III. 연구방법 15
    • 1. 조사대상 15
    • 2. 조사도구 16
    • 3. 조사절차 18
    • 4. 자료분석 18
    • IV. 연구결과 및 논의 20
    • 1. 대학교수들의 수업에 대한 관심의 정도 20
    • 2. 대학교수들의 수업설계 실행의 정도 21
    • 3. 대학교수들의 경력, 직급, 수업관련 연수경험, 그리고 수업에 관한 관심의 정도에 따른 수업설계 실행의 정도 23
    • 4. 대학교수들이 수업설계를 하지 않는 이유 35
    • V. 결론 및 제언 38
    • Abstract 43
    • 부록 44
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼