RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    아리스토텔레스 윤리학의 행복 개념 = Concept of happiness in Aristotle's Ethics

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11597074

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In this paper I examined what is Aristotle's happiness through his book of Nicomachean Ethics. It appears that he proposes two contrasting views on happiness.
    In order to describe Aristotle's two different ideas on happiness in Book 1 and 10, Hardie used the terms, inclusive, and dominant, in his book in 1965. An inclusive view of happiness interprets that happiness refers to not a specific virtue, but a combination of all virtues. It presents as a base for the inclusive interpretation the first Book where a life in accordance with moral virtue can be construed as happiness. On the other hand, a dominant view of happiness sees that happiness pertains to a spiritual activity, namely contemplation, which is the most important function of humans, and presents the tenth Book as the evidence.
    I also investigated as a third approach Lawrence's view which attempts to resolve the conflicts between the two views by distinguishing two forms of an ideal life. Lawrence stated that contemplative activities can become the best way of life in an ideal condition where there are no factors disrupting humane needs and contemplative life, and performing a human excellence can consist of the best life in situations where there are difficulties to be accepted and actual prerequisites because of being a human.
    I supposes that one fails to appreciate Aristotle's assertion in a proper way if one maintains that only one of the two views is right. It seems that Aristotle prepared the way how philosophers and common citizens select a type of life which is the most appropriate and valuable for their own purposes and live happy lives according to their natures and situations. Aristotle considers a life compatible with moral virtue or based on fortune happiness, too, so his conception on happiness is comprehensive and all-embracing. He only positions a contemplative life consisting of inquiring into human intrinsic functions at the highest level of happiness.
    Happiness is self-realization achieved through continuous development of theory and practice. In other words, when one controls senses and needs by the force of reason, he or she can reach happiness. Therefore, it is important that rather than understanding the notion of contemplation emphasized in Book ten of Nicomachean Ethics in a narrow sense, we should interpret that he emphasized that it plays a primary role in leading a human life in his whole career so that reason, a human intrinsic function, can be completely exerted.
    번역하기

    In this paper I examined what is Aristotle's happiness through his book of Nicomachean Ethics. It appears that he proposes two contrasting views on happiness. In order to describe Aristotle's two different ideas on happiness in Book 1 and 10, Hardie ...

    In this paper I examined what is Aristotle's happiness through his book of Nicomachean Ethics. It appears that he proposes two contrasting views on happiness.
    In order to describe Aristotle's two different ideas on happiness in Book 1 and 10, Hardie used the terms, inclusive, and dominant, in his book in 1965. An inclusive view of happiness interprets that happiness refers to not a specific virtue, but a combination of all virtues. It presents as a base for the inclusive interpretation the first Book where a life in accordance with moral virtue can be construed as happiness. On the other hand, a dominant view of happiness sees that happiness pertains to a spiritual activity, namely contemplation, which is the most important function of humans, and presents the tenth Book as the evidence.
    I also investigated as a third approach Lawrence's view which attempts to resolve the conflicts between the two views by distinguishing two forms of an ideal life. Lawrence stated that contemplative activities can become the best way of life in an ideal condition where there are no factors disrupting humane needs and contemplative life, and performing a human excellence can consist of the best life in situations where there are difficulties to be accepted and actual prerequisites because of being a human.
    I supposes that one fails to appreciate Aristotle's assertion in a proper way if one maintains that only one of the two views is right. It seems that Aristotle prepared the way how philosophers and common citizens select a type of life which is the most appropriate and valuable for their own purposes and live happy lives according to their natures and situations. Aristotle considers a life compatible with moral virtue or based on fortune happiness, too, so his conception on happiness is comprehensive and all-embracing. He only positions a contemplative life consisting of inquiring into human intrinsic functions at the highest level of happiness.
    Happiness is self-realization achieved through continuous development of theory and practice. In other words, when one controls senses and needs by the force of reason, he or she can reach happiness. Therefore, it is important that rather than understanding the notion of contemplation emphasized in Book ten of Nicomachean Ethics in a narrow sense, we should interpret that he emphasized that it plays a primary role in leading a human life in his whole career so that reason, a human intrinsic function, can be completely exerted.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • Ⅱ. 『니코마코스 윤리학』1권에서의 행복 개념 = 4
    • 1. 최고의 좋음, 최고의 목적으로서의 행복 = 4
    • 2. 행복의 형식적 특징 = 6
    • 3. 기능논변 = 10
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • Ⅱ. 『니코마코스 윤리학』1권에서의 행복 개념 = 4
    • 1. 최고의 좋음, 최고의 목적으로서의 행복 = 4
    • 2. 행복의 형식적 특징 = 6
    • 3. 기능논변 = 10
    • 4. 외부 선 = 14
    • Ⅲ. 『니코마코스 윤리학』 10권에서의 행복 개념 = 16
    • 1. 관조의 특징 = 17
    • 2. 관조적 삶의 특징 = 20
    • Ⅳ. 아리스토텔레스의 행복 개념에 대한 두 입장 = 23
    • 1. 포괄론적 입장 = 24
    • 2. 우월론적 입장 = 27
    • Ⅴ. 포괄론과 우월론의 한계 및 제3의 입장 = 30
    • 1. 포괄론의 문제점 = 30
    • 2. 우월론의 문제점 = 31
    • 3. 제3의 입장 = 33
    • Ⅵ. 결론 = 35
    • 참고문헌 = 37
    • (Abstract) = 40
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼