RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    부모의 양육태도와 유아의 사회성 발달과의 관계

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11546131

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      공주 : 공주대학교 대학원, 2009

    • 학위논문사항
    • 발행연도

      2009

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 발행국(도시)

      충청남도

    • 기타서명

      (The) Relationship between Parents' Nurturing Attitude & Child's Social Maturity

    • 형태사항

      58 장 ; 삽도 ; 26 cm

    • 일반주기명

      참고문헌 : 40 - 43장

    • 소장기관
      • 국립공주대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this research is to define how parents’ child rearing attitude and development of children’s sociability are related.
    Towards this end, the following research questions were selected.
    1. What is the relationship between parents’ child rearing attitude and development of children’s sociability?
    2. What is the relationship with the development of children’s sociability following the degree of correspondence with the parents’ child rearing attitude?
    3. What is the child rearing attitude following parents’ background?
    In order to attain this purpose, this study implemented two kinds of qestionnaires to 300 children and their parents. The data collected were processed by Pearson's correlation coefficients and T-test, F-test statistics using SPSSWIN program.
    When the results are drawn out centered on this research’s results, they are as follows.
    First, affectionate attitude and controlling attitude among fathers’ child rearing attitudes are almost not related to the ability to understand others among the children’s sociability, while there is very close correlation with the ability to cooperate with others, independence, interaction with peers and all of the sociability. In particular, hostile attitude assumes very negative correlation with the children’s sociability.
    As for the mothers’ child rearing attitude, it is possible to see that it manifests high correlation with the children’s sociability on a statistically significant level. Like the fathers, mothers’ hostile child rearing attitude assumes very negative correlation when it comes to the development of children’s sociability.
    Second, fathers’ child rearing attitude influences children’s sociability. In particular, ability to cooperate with others and independence are higher among the children of the democratic fathers compared to the children of authoritative fathers’ child rearing attitude.
    As for the authoritative mothers’ child rearing attitude, children’s sociability develops the lowest, while ability to cooperate with others and ability to understand others of overprotected children are very closely correlated. As for the democratic type, there is close correlation between independence and sociability development. Compared to fathers’ child rearing attitude, mothers’ child rearing attitude significantly affects children’s sociability.
    Third, there is almost no correlation between parents’ child rearing attitude’s correspondence and non-correspondence when it comes to the development of children’s sociability perceived by the fathers and mothers.
    Fourth, there is almost no change in the child rearing attitude following parents’ personal background. However, as fathers’ education level is higher, it can be referred to as independent child rearing attitude. In case of mothers, there is no difference following other variables, and independent attitude among the mothers who are specialists is higher compared to the mothers who are company employees. When these research results are integrated, independent attitude among the mothers who are specialists is higher compared to the mothers who are company employees. Given these research results, independent child rearing attitude is higher among the mothers who are specialists.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this research is to define how parents’ child rearing attitude and development of children’s sociability are related. Towards this end, the following research questions were selected. 1. What is the relationship between parents’ c...

    The purpose of this research is to define how parents’ child rearing attitude and development of children’s sociability are related.
    Towards this end, the following research questions were selected.
    1. What is the relationship between parents’ child rearing attitude and development of children’s sociability?
    2. What is the relationship with the development of children’s sociability following the degree of correspondence with the parents’ child rearing attitude?
    3. What is the child rearing attitude following parents’ background?
    In order to attain this purpose, this study implemented two kinds of qestionnaires to 300 children and their parents. The data collected were processed by Pearson's correlation coefficients and T-test, F-test statistics using SPSSWIN program.
    When the results are drawn out centered on this research’s results, they are as follows.
    First, affectionate attitude and controlling attitude among fathers’ child rearing attitudes are almost not related to the ability to understand others among the children’s sociability, while there is very close correlation with the ability to cooperate with others, independence, interaction with peers and all of the sociability. In particular, hostile attitude assumes very negative correlation with the children’s sociability.
    As for the mothers’ child rearing attitude, it is possible to see that it manifests high correlation with the children’s sociability on a statistically significant level. Like the fathers, mothers’ hostile child rearing attitude assumes very negative correlation when it comes to the development of children’s sociability.
    Second, fathers’ child rearing attitude influences children’s sociability. In particular, ability to cooperate with others and independence are higher among the children of the democratic fathers compared to the children of authoritative fathers’ child rearing attitude.
    As for the authoritative mothers’ child rearing attitude, children’s sociability develops the lowest, while ability to cooperate with others and ability to understand others of overprotected children are very closely correlated. As for the democratic type, there is close correlation between independence and sociability development. Compared to fathers’ child rearing attitude, mothers’ child rearing attitude significantly affects children’s sociability.
    Third, there is almost no correlation between parents’ child rearing attitude’s correspondence and non-correspondence when it comes to the development of children’s sociability perceived by the fathers and mothers.
    Fourth, there is almost no change in the child rearing attitude following parents’ personal background. However, as fathers’ education level is higher, it can be referred to as independent child rearing attitude. In case of mothers, there is no difference following other variables, and independent attitude among the mothers who are specialists is higher compared to the mothers who are company employees. When these research results are integrated, independent attitude among the mothers who are specialists is higher compared to the mothers who are company employees. Given these research results, independent child rearing attitude is higher among the mothers who are specialists.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 문제 = 3
    • 3. 용어 정의 = 3
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 5
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 문제 = 3
    • 3. 용어 정의 = 3
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 5
    • 1. 부모의 양육태도 = 5
    • 2. 유아의 사회성 = 9
    • 3. 부모의 양육태도와 유아의 사회성 발달과의 관계 = 12
    • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 = 16
    • 1. 연구 대상 = 16
    • 2. 연구 도구 = 16
    • 3. 자료 분석 = 18
    • Ⅳ. 연구결과 및 해석 = 19
    • 1. 부모의 양육태도와 유아의 사회성 발달과의 관계 = 19
    • 2. 부모의 양육태도 일치정도에 따른 유아의 사회성 발달의 차이 = 25
    • Ⅴ. 논의 및 결론 = 37
    • 1. 논의 = 38
    • 2. 결론 = 38
    • 참고문헌 = 40
    • ABSTRACT = 44
    • [부록 1] = 47
    • [부록 2] = 55
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼