연합주의 관점의 창의적 사고력 모형 = Creative thinking model in the view of associative theory

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The present study examines the influence of working memory capacity, the breadth of attention, and the cognitive load on creativity in the view of associative theory. The study is largely divided into three parts.
The purpose of the study 1 is to compose the model of creative thinking in the view of associative theory through the previous theories and studies. This model posits that creative solutions occur when new associations are formed between disparate elements from memory. The breadth of attention is a positive function of the association, the working memory capacity is also a positive function but, cognitive load is an inverse function.
The purpose of the study 2 is to verify the relationship between the working memory capacity, the breadth of attention and creativity.
Multiple measures of each of these constructs were obtained from 124 elementary school students(second-grade students from two elementary school in metropolitan city of Daegu).
The results of the study 2 are as follows :
1. Results of bivariate regression analysis demonstrates that the breath of attention has significant positive influence on the fluency, flexibility and the originality.
2. Results of bivariate regression analysis demonstrates that the working memory capacity has significant positive influence on the fluency, flexibility and the originality.
3. Structural equation modeling is then performed. As hypothesized, the findings of the study indicates the significant positive relationships between working memory capacity and breadth of attention on creativity. The interaction model that assumes the interaction between working memory capacity and the breadth of attention shows the better fit indices.
The purpose of the study 3 is to investigate the effects of the cognitive load on creativity, furthermore on the wide or narrow breadth of attention.
254 second-grade elementary school students from two school in metropolitan city of Daegu participate in this experiment. Students were assigned into two groups(High cognitive load group-130, Control group-124).
The results of the study 3 are as follows :
1. Results of t-test demonstrates that the cognitive load has significant negative effects on the fluency, flexibility and the originality.
2. Results of two-way ANOVA demonstrates that cognitive load impairs fluency, flexibility and originality more in participants whose trait breadth of attention is wide than in those whose trait breadth of attention is narrow.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• I. 서론 = 1
• 1. 연구의 필요성 = 1
• 2. 연구문제의 진술 = 6
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 7
• 1. 연합 이론(Associative Theory) = 7
• 2. 기존 모형의 고찰 = 8
• 가. 요소 모형 = 9
• 나. 과정모형 = 17
• 다. 국내 연구의 고찰 = 37
• Ⅲ. 연구 1: 연합 주의 관점의 창의적 사고력 모형 = 39
• 1. 모형의 구성 과정 = 39
• 가. 주의 집중력과 새로운 조합 가능성 = 39
• 나. 작업기억 용량과 새로운 조합 가능성 = 43
• 다. 작업기억 용량과 주의 집중력 = 45
• 라. 인지 부하량과 새로운 조합 가능성 = 48
• 2. 연합 주의 관점의 창의적 사고력 모형 = 51
• 3. 연합 주의 관점의 창의적 사고력 모형의 이점 = 52
• IV. 연구 2: 주의 집중력과 작업기억 용량이 창의적 사고에 미치는 영향 = 57
• 1. 연구가설 = 57
• 2. 연구방법 = 57
• 가. 연구대상 = 57
• 나. 측정도구 = 58
• 다. 자료의 분석 = 62
• 3. 연구결과 = 64
• 가. 주의 집중력이 창의적 사고에 미치는 영향 = 65
• 나. 작업기억 용량이 창의적 사고력에 미치는 영향 = 67
• 다. 주의 집중력과 작업기억 용량 = 68
• 4. 논의 = 73
• V. 연구 3: 인지 부하량이 창의적 사고에 미치는 영향 = 80
• 1. 연구가설 = 80
• 2. 연구방법 = 80
• 가. 연구대상 = 80
• 나. 측정도구 = 81
• 다. 실험설계 = 81
• 라. 실험처치 = 81
• 마. 실험절차 = 82
• 바. 자료의 분석 = 82
• 3. 연구 결과 = 83
• 가. 인지 부하량과 창의적 사고력 = 83
• 나. 인지부하량과 주의집중력이 창의적 사고에 미치는 영향 = 84
• 4. 논의 = 90
• Ⅵ. 종합 논의 = 92
• Ⅶ. 결론 = 101
• 참고문헌 = 104
• 영문초록 = 120
• 부록 = 122

참고문헌 (Reference)

1. TTCT(언어)-A형, 김영채, , 2002

2. Creativity in context, Amabile, Teresa, Westview Press, Creativity in context, , 1996

3. Creativity is forever, Davis, Gary A., Kendall/Hunt Pub. Co., Creativity is Forever, , 1986

4. Investing in creativity, Lubart, Sternberg, , 1996

5. Cognition and creativity, Chand, Runco, , 1995

6. FAIR 주의 집중력 검사, 오현숙, , 2002

7. The structure of the intellect, Guilford, , 1956

8. Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge, Sternberg, , 1999

9. 창의성 구조 모형의 검증, 김혜숙, 최인수, 한국교육심리학회, "교육심리연구, , 2002

10. Creativity and breadth of attention, Kasof, , 1997

11. Learning and individual differences, Pellegrino, Morrin, Law, , 1995

12. Cognitive load: Updating the theory?, Valcke, , 2002

13. Promoting insightful problem solving, Ansburg, Dominowski, Ansburg, P. I., , 2000

14. 통합적 창의성 모형의 구성, 김명숙, 한국교육심리학회, "교육심리연구, , 2001

15. 창의성연구:다원적 접근방법, 전경원, 창의성 연구 : 다원적 접근 방법, , 2005

16. Effect of sound on creative performance, Kaltsounis, , 1973

17. In M, A, Runco, & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), O'Quin, Derks, "In M, , 1999

18. 창의성에 대한 심리학적 고찰, 문병상 ( Byung Sang Mun ), 이명자 ( Myung Ja Lee ), , 2003

19. Individual differences in WM and reading, Daneman, Carpenter.P.A, , 1980

20. The cognitive network model of creativity, de Vreede, Santanen, Briggs, , 2000

21. A simulation of memory for chess positions, Gilmartin, Simon, , 1973

22. Is working memory capacity task dependent?, Turner, Engle, , 1989

23. Predicting children's creative performance, Runco, , 1986

24. An interactionist model ofcreative behavior, Schoenfelt, Woodman, An interactionist model of creative behavior, , 1990

25. Cognition, creativity, and entrepreneurship, Ward, "Cognition, , 2004

26. On the neurobiology of the creative process, Ch?vez-Eakle, , 2004

27. Process analytic models of creative thought, Mumford, Uhlman, Doares, Mobley, Reiter-Palmon, , 1991

28. Towarda theory of organizational creativity, Griffin, Woodman, Toward a theory of organizational creativity, , 1993

29. Divergent thinking creativity,and giftedness, Runco, "Divergent thinking, , 1993

30. The associative basis of the creativeprocess, Mendick, , 1962

31. 인지부하가 오기억에 미치는 영향, 박미자 ( Park Mi Ja ), 한국심리학회, "한국심리학회지:실험, , 2004

32. Aging. In M, A, Runco, & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Langer, Levy, "Aging. In M, , 1999

33. Working memory capacity as executive attention, Engle, , 2002

34. Attention. In M. Runco and S. R. Pritzker (Ed.), Toplyn, , 1999

35. Eccentricity, conformism, and the primary process, Sass, "Eccentricity, , 2001

36. Enhancing creativity, innovation, and cooperation, Muller, "Enhancing creativity, , 1993

37. Hyperactivity and creativity: the tacit dimension, Shaw, , 1992

38. Judgment under uncertainty : heuristics and biases, Kahneman, Daniel, Cambridge University Press, Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, , 1982

39. Laterality, implicit memory and attention disorder, Brown, Shaw, "Laterality, , 1991

40. Children's divergent thinking and creative ideation, Runco, , 1992

41. Creatology. In M, A, Runco, & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Magyari-Beck, "Creatology. In M, , 1999

42. Nonauditory effects of noise on behavior and health, Weinstein N, Cohen, , 1981

43. Creativity, primary process cognition and personality, Dailey, Martindale, "Creativity, , 1996

44. Working memory and attention network test performance, Engle, Redick, , 2006

45. 작업기억 용량과 부화 및 창의성의 관계, 박미자(Mi Cha Park), 이정모 ( Jung Mo Lee ), 박희경(Hee Kyeong Park), 한국심리학회, "한국심리학회지:실험 및 인지, , 2001

46. A general abstract-concrete model of creative thinking, Cagle, , 1985

47. A theory of reading: From eye fixation to comprehension, Carpenter, Just, , 1980

48. Guilford's view' In M, A, Runco, & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Michael, "Guilford's view' In M, , 1999

49. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control, Lavie, Hirst A, De Fockert, , 2004

50. Associative Theory. in M. Runco and S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Fasko, , 1999

51. Three-facet model of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Sternberg, , 1988

52. Working memory. Comptes rendus de l'Acad?mie des sciences, Baddeley, , 1998

53. Creativity and the quantum: A unified theory of creativity, Goswami, , 1996

54. Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis, Merikle, Daneman, , 1996

55. Working memory span and the role of proactive interference, May, Lustig, Hasher, , 2001

56. Diagnostic ability of word association emotional indicators, Upmanyu, Kaur, , 1986

57. Fourth grade slump. In M, A, Runco, & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Runco, M. A., "Fourth grade slump. In M, , 1999

58. Story-telling: A method for assessing children's creativity, Amabile, Hennessey, , 1988

59. Componential models. In M, A, Runco, & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Lubart, "Componential models. In M, , 1999

60. Creativity and environmental cues in nursery school children, Ward, , 1969

61. Memory and Creativity. In M. Runco and S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), N?cka, , 1999

62. Teaching Creativity. In M, A, Runco, & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Ripple, "Teaching Creativity. In M, , 1999

63. 통합적 창의성 프로그램의 개발 및 효과 검증, 김명숙, 한국교육심리학회, "교육심리연구, , 2001

64. Changes in cortical activity after training of working memory, Klingberg, Westerberg, , 2007

65. Development of working memory for verbal-spatial associations, Cowan, Saults, Morey, , 2006

66. Primary-Process thinking and creativity: Affect and cognition, Russ, Primary-process thinking and creativity: Affect and cognition, , 2000

67. Programs and Courses. In M, A, Runco, & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Parnes, "Programs and Courses. In M, , 1999

68. 창의성의 유형화와 그 적용 가능성에 관한 연구, 강소연, 연세대학교, 창의성의 유형화와 그 적용가능성에 관한 연구, , 1996

69. Creative cognition: Theory, research and applications, Cambridge, Finke, Smith, Ward, "Creative cognition : Theory, , 1992

70. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention, Lavie, , 1995

71. Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence, Kane, Engle, , 2003

72. Idea generation in groups: A basis forcreativity in organizations, Paulus, Yang, , 2000

73. Implicit theories of artistic, scientific and everyday creativity, Runco, M. A., Runco, Bahleda, "Implicit theories of artistic, , 1986

74. Working memory capacity in schixothrenia: a parametric FMRI study, Ramsey, Kahn, van der Wee, , 2004

75. Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique, Amabile, , 1983

76. Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full, Vogel, Woodman, Luck, , 2001

77. Direcied brainstorming and the cognitive network model of creativity, Santanen, , 2002

78. The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization, Amabile, The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization, , 1983

79. 창의적인 문제 해결 능력에 필요한 구성요소의 탐색, 장수웅, 한국기술교육학회, "한국기술교육학회지, , 2003

80. The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of WM capacity, Bunting, Conway, Cowan, , 2001

81. 통합적 접근에 기초한 아동의 창의성 측정 도구 개발, 김종안, 성균관대학교, 통합적 접근에 기초한 아동의 창의성 측정 도구 개발, , 1998

82. Creative ability, the laboratory environment and scientific performance, Andrews, "Creative ability, , 1967

83. Creativity enhancement in problem solving: Through software or process?, Elam, Marakas, , 1997

84. 작업기억의 용량에 따른 언어이해 처리에서의 개인차, 이병택, , 1995

85. Motivating the focus of attention. In P. M. Niedenthal & Kitayama (Eds.), Tucker, Derryberry, , 1994

86. Various approaches to and definitions of creativity. In G, A, Davis (Ed), Taylor, "Various approaches to and definitions of creativity. In G, , 1988

87. Creativity with aging: Four phases of potential inthe second half of life, Cohen, Creativity with aging: Four phases of potential in the second half of life, , 2001

88. From incubation to insight: Working memory and the role of the cerebellum, Ch?vez-Eakle, , 2007

89. Individual differences in non-conscious processing: the role of creativity, Conway, Shaw, , 1990

90. A capacity theory ofcomprehension: Individual differences in working memory, Just, Carpenter, , 1992

91. Creative and analytic thinkers differ in their use of attentional resources, Hill, Ansburg, , 2003

92. Selective attention in schizophrenia: relationship to verbal working memory, Carter, Barch, , 1998

93. The influence of approach and avoidance motor actions on creative cognition, F?rster, Friedman, , 2002

94. The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Torrance, , 1988

95. When a group is not a group: The cognitive foundation of group idea generation, Dennis, Nagasundaram, , 1993

96. Groups, teams, and creativity : The creative potential of idea generating groups, Paulus, "Groups, , 2000

97. How shall creativity be measured? Torrance tests, RAT, Alph biographical and I.Q, Davis, Belcher, "How shall creativity be measured? Torrance tests, , 1971

98. Individual differences in WM capacity: More evidence for a general capacity theory, Engle, Conway, , 1996

99. Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: III. Category selection, Mumford, Supinski, Baughman, Threlfall, , 1996

100. Cultural availability: An associative characteristic of remote associate test items, Ginsburg, Hood, , 1969

101. 아동의 창의성 발달 및 이에 관련된 생태학적 변인에 관한 연구, 조성연, 조성연, 延世大學校, 연세대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 1990

102. On Structure in the Creative process: A quantitative case-study of Picasso's Guernica, Weisberg, , 2004

103. Perceptual automaticity in expert chess players: Parallel encoding of chess relations, Reingold, Schultetus, Charness, Stampe, , 2001

104. The differential effect of increased arousal on creative and intellectual performance, Greenough.J, Martindale, , 1973

105. How working memory and the crerbellum collaborate to produce creativity and innovation, Schimpf, Vandervert, Liu, , 2007

106. 창의적 사고력과 공간도형지능, 학업성적, 창의적 인성과의 관계, 성은현, "창의적 사고력과 공간도형지능, , 2003

107. A critical appraisal of the theoretical validity of the Mednick remote association test, val Lill, Ochse, , 1990

108. Adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder identified by neuropsychological testing, Dige, Gustav, , 2005

109. On the effectiveness of group brainstorming : Test of one underlying cognitive mechanism, Schneider, Routhieaux, Connolly, , 1993

110. Creative problem solving: An introduction. In G, A, Davis, Creativity is Forever (p. 119), Treffinger, Dorval, "Creative problem solving: An introduction. In G, , 1994

111. 창의성을 이해하기 위한 체계 모델. 성균관대학교 생활과학 연구소, 최인수, , 2000

112. Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in otherknowledge processes, Campbell, , 1960

113. How specificisadeficitofexecutivefunction-ing forattention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder?, Sergeant, Oosterlaan, Guerts, , 2002

114. Schizophrenia, modernism, and the "Creative Imagination": On creativity and psychopathology, Sass, "Schizophrenia, , 2001

115. CPS를 위한 Blended Learning 프로그램 개발: 고등학교 수학내용을 중심으로, 김영미, Im Sun-Woo, Kim Hyang-Sook, 임선우, 김향숙, Kim Young-Mi, 한국수학교육학회, , 2006

116. Evidence to support the componential model of creativity: Secondary analyses of three studies, Conti, Coon, Amabile, , 1996

117. Personality, situation, and creativity. In J.A. Glover, R.R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Martindale, "Personality, , 1989

118. 창의성 구조 모형을 적용한 창의적 활동 수행집단과 일반 집단의 비교, 김혜숙, 최인수, 한국교육심리학회, "교육심리연구, , 2003

119. The influence of working memory on reading and creative writing processes in a second language, Abu-Rabia, , 2003

120. The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children, Ryan, Siegel, , 1989

121. The magical number seven, plus or minus tow: Some limits on our capacity for information processing, Miller, "The magical number seven, , 1956

122. 이중몰입의 구조방정식모형에 관한 연구:개념구성과인과 경로를 중심으로, 이병훈, 유제민, 한국사회학회, 이중몰입의 구조방정식 모형에 관한 연구:개념구성과 인과경로를 중심으로, , 2002

123. On the neurobiology of creativity. Differences in frontal activity between high and low creative subjects, Wendt, Carlsson, Risberg, , 2000

124. Working memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: limits on long-tern memory retrieval, Kane, Engle, "Working memory capacity, , 2000

125. The relationship between psychoticism, trait creativity and the attentional mechanism of cognitive inhibition, Stavridou, Furnham, "The relationship between psychoticism, , 1996

126. Cognitive load and learner expertise: Split-attention and redundancy effects in reading with explanatory notes, Sweller, Jin, Yeung, , 1998

127. How working memory and cognitive modeling functions of the cerebellum contribute to discoveries in mathematics, Vandervert, , 2003

128. Individual differences in problem solving via insight. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Ansburg, "Individual differences in problem solving via insight. Current Psychology: Developmental, , 2000

129. Relationship between speed of information-processing and two major personality dimensions-extraversion and neuroticism, Bucik, Socan, , 1998

130. Study of the brain organization of creativity: Ⅲ. Brain activation assessed by the local cerebral blood flow and EEG, Pakhomov, Medvedev, Dan'ko.S.G, Starchenko, Bekhtereva, , 2001

131. Redirection learners' attention during training: effects on cognitive load, transfer test performance and training efficiency, Paas, Croock, Merriёnboer, Schuurman, "Redirection learners' attention during training: effects on cognitive load, , 2002

132. Rapid visual information processing in schizophrenic patients: The impact of cognitive load and duration of stimulus presentation, Feldon, Vollenweider, Hilti, Cattapan-Ludewig, Ludewig, , 2005

133. Cognitive load and learner expertise: Split-attention and redundancy effects in reading comprehension tasks with vocabulary definitions, Yeung, , 1999

134. On "How working memory and the cerebellum collaborate to produce creativity and innovation" by L. R. Vandervert, P. H. Schimpf, and H. Liu, Ito, "On ""How working memory and the cerebellum collaborate to produce creativity and innovation"" by L. R. Vandervert, , 2007

135. A cognitive network model of creativity: A renewed focus on brainstorming methodology. Proceedings of the international conference on information systems, Santanen, de Vreede, Briggs, , 1999

136. Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. its relation to general intelligence, Engle, Kane, "Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, , 2003