축구선수들의 심판인식도 조사 연구 = The study of recognition for referee in football players

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The research is that solving disbelief between the football player and referee for the raising reliability, and investigates the recognition of the players ! about the referee who are currently being active and indicates sever al points that the referee keeps; therefore, for the aim of reform measure of trust recovery and a game development of mutual player and referee, a survey executed with 304 people of the junior high school, the high school, university team players which are registered with 2008 Korea Football Association football player.
The research tool which is used for the survey is “Kim Ki-Sun (2002) recognition investigation of Taekwondo players about referee”, “Kim Chul (2006) the research about recognit! ion of referee decision in the hockey game” and “Jung Chang-Woo (2002) investigation about referee recognition of university football players.
On the basis of this research, the study, which is complemented and revised, is appropriately drawn up in order to correspond with the research goal. The next research data operated spss win ver.12.0 date process and got the following result.
First, for inquiring into the referee recognition which belong to each judgment’s place, the result which investigates with accuracy of referee, activity and cooperative of referee, an attitude of referee, fairness of referee, reliability of referee, and the decision influence of referee appeared with the fact that is the difference from accuracy of referee. After post analysis result, junior high school appeared as regards the difference than high school and university. Junior high school compare with high school and university appeared more possibility recognition about referee.
Second, the offense, the midfielder and the defender are not visible the difference from the referee recognition which follows in the position, so that, referee recognition which follows in the position makes no difference.
Third, from the referee recognition which follows career, the difference is appeared by accuracy. After post analysis result, careers below of 6 years appeared the difference as compared with the career group of 7~9 and 10 or more.
Under 6 years players who have small career conduct the high answer from all subordinate factors. Following the factor, with accuracy, activity and cooperative, fairness and reliability appeared the difference statistically.
Fourth, when the referee recognition of the soccer players examines closely indirect or direct effects about decision influence of the subordinate factors, the accuracy of referee has a direct effect of a negative (-) to decision influence, and the attitude of referee has a indirect effect of a negative (-) to decision influence.
Also, the fairness of referee had the indirect effect of positive (+) and ! the direct effect of negative (-). Thereliability of the referee which is a parametric had a direct effect of a negative (-) to decision influence. The total effect which reaches in decision influence about recognition of referee appeared with reliability, accuracy, attitude, and fairness of referee.
As a result, when the referee recognition of the players whom follows population sociology sees all the difference, the recognition is negative about the referee after assigned group and career will be raised.
Such player and referee is the professional who coexists with in the soccer game, as well, understanding attitude and trust based on respect each other is required to show the best game for spectators, and doing best is very important for developing the game performan

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
• 1. 연구의 필요성 = 1
• 2. 연구의 목적 = 4
• 3. 연구 가설 = 4
• 4. 연구의 제한점 = 5
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 6
• 1. 축구의 역사 = 6
• 2. 한국 축구의 역사 = 9
• 3. 축구 경기의 특성 = 13
• 4. 심판원 = 14
• 5. 축구심판의 역할 및 판정의 중요성 = 15
• 6. 축구심판의 자격 및 자질 = 17
• 7. 축구심판의 권한과 임무 = 19
• Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 21
• 1. 연구 대상 = 21
• 2. 설문지의 타당도 = 22
• 3. 설문지의 신뢰도 분석 = 24
• 4. 연구 기간 = 25
• 5. 조사 도구 = 25
• 6. 조사 방법 = 26
• 7. 자료 처리 방법 = 26
• Ⅳ. 연구결과 = 27
• 1. 소속에 따른 심판인식도 = 27
• 2. 포지션에 따른 심판인식도 = 28
• 3. 경력에 따른 심판 인식도 = 29
• 4. 심판의 인식도 하위요인과 판정영향력에 대한 경로분석 = 30
• Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 = 32
• 1. 결론 = 32
• 2. 제언 = 33
• 참고문헌 = 34
• 부록 = 37