RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      중고등학생의 사회지능, 진로자기효능감과 학교적응간의 관계 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11216058

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        강릉 : 관동대학교 대학원, 2008

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(박사) -- 관동대학교 대학원 , 교육학과 , 2008. 2

      • 발행연도

        2008

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • KDC

        370.18

      • 발행국(도시)

        강원특별자치도

      • 기타서명

        (A)study on he relationship between social intelligence, career self-efficacy, school-related adjustment in secondary school

      • 형태사항

        iv, 166 p. : 삽도 ; 26 cm.

      • 일반주기명

        지도교수 : 권형자
        참고문헌 : p.145-156

      • 소장기관
        • 가톨릭관동대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
        • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      There are a lot of factors to help improve the school adaptability of secondary students. Social intelligence and career self-efficacy are expected to affect that as well, on which the focus of this study was placed as variables that might influence school adjustment. The purpose of this study was to have a better understanding of the school- adjustment behavior of adolescents, to acquire a variety of in-depth scientific data on successful school adjustment and to lay the groundwork for developing efficient programs geared toward diagnosing and preventing school maladjustment.
      The subjects in this study were 1,376 secondary students in six different regions that included two regions each that were selected from large cities, small urban communities and rural areas across the nation. Both academic and vocational high school students were selected, and a survey was conducted with self-administered questionnaires. The collected data were analyzed with SPSS/WIN 13.0 program.
      The major findings of the study were as follows:
      First, regarding Hypothesis 1, the students investigated were different from one another in social intelligence, career self-efficacy and school adjustment according to their personal background variables.
      As for differences by grade of school in Hypothesis 1-1, the middle schoolers were ahead of the high schoolers in social intelligence, career self-efficacy and school adjustment, which included social openness, vocational information, self-evaluation, target setting, future plans, and adjustment to school instruction, friends, teachers, school regulations and school environments. The former experienced more social anxiety than the latter.
      Concerning differences by residential areas in Hypothesis 1-2, the students from large urban communities excelled the others from small urban and rural areas in social intelligence, social perception, social self- efficacy, career self-efficacy, self-evaluation, target setting and adjust- ment to school instruction, friends, school regulations and school environments. The students from large urban areas adapted themselves the best to school and teachers, followed by those from rural regions and those from small urban communities.
      As to differences by academic achievement in Hypothesis 1-3, the high-ranking students surpassed the intermediate and low-ranking groups in social intelligence, career self-efficacy, school adjustment and all the subfactors. But there was no intergroup gap in social anxiety and friend adjustment. In regard to the influence of living together with parents, the students who lived with their real parents were most excellent in social intelligence and social perception. Those who lived with step parents were significantly better at career self-efficacy, target setting and future plans. The students who lived with their real parents acquired better vocational information than those from single-parent families. The students whose parents were absent scored lowest in all the regards except problem solving. The students from intact families adjusted themselves the best to school, school instruction and friends.
      As for the impact of parent occupation in Hypothesis 1-5, the students whose fathers and mothers were professionals and semi-professionals respectively had the highest social intelligence. The students whose fathers and mothers were in management post had the best career self- efficacy. The students whose fathers were professionals were most excellent in school adjustment, followed by those whose fathers were in management post, and the students whose mothers were semi- professionals(technicians) were the best in terms of school adjustment. In other words, the students whose parents had a stable profession were excellent in social intelligence, career self-efficacy and school adjustment.
      In relation to the impact of the academic background of parents in Hypothesis 1-6, the students whose fathers and mothers graduated from graduate school and college respectively had the highest social intelligence, and those whose parents stopped at middle school had the lowest social intelligence. In terms of career self-efficacy, the students whose fathers and mothers graduated from graduate schools were the best. The students whose fathers and mothers graduated from graduate school and college respectively adapted themselves the best to school, school instruction, friends, school regulations and school environments. Accordingly, the academic background of parents made a significant difference to their social intelligence, career self-efficacy and school adjustment.
      Second, as for correlation between social intelligence, career self- efficacy and school adjustment in Hypothesis 2, there was the strongest correlation between school adjustment and teacher adjustment and the weakest correlation between problem solving and the efficiency of social behavior. As to the relationship of social intelligence, career self-efficacy and the subfactors of the two to school adjustment, there was the closest correlation between social intelligence and school adjustment and the weakest correlation between social openness and teacher adjustment. It indicated that an improved social intelligence could lead to better school adjustment. Specifically, the students who were more open socially and consequently more flexible found it more difficult to fit in with teachers.
      Third, in regard to the influence of the subfactors of social intelligence and career self-efficacy on school adjustment in Hypothesis 3, self- evaluation had the greatest impact on that, followed by social self- efficacy, social perception, social anxiety and the efficiency of social behavior. Thus, most of the social-intelligence subfactors exercised an influence on school adjustment. Overall, self-evaluation and social self- efficacy that denoted belief and confidence in one's own ability had the greatest impact on school adjustment and its subfactors. In order to boost
      번역하기

      There are a lot of factors to help improve the school adaptability of secondary students. Social intelligence and career self-efficacy are expected to affect that as well, on which the focus of this study was placed as variables that might influence s...

      There are a lot of factors to help improve the school adaptability of secondary students. Social intelligence and career self-efficacy are expected to affect that as well, on which the focus of this study was placed as variables that might influence school adjustment. The purpose of this study was to have a better understanding of the school- adjustment behavior of adolescents, to acquire a variety of in-depth scientific data on successful school adjustment and to lay the groundwork for developing efficient programs geared toward diagnosing and preventing school maladjustment.
      The subjects in this study were 1,376 secondary students in six different regions that included two regions each that were selected from large cities, small urban communities and rural areas across the nation. Both academic and vocational high school students were selected, and a survey was conducted with self-administered questionnaires. The collected data were analyzed with SPSS/WIN 13.0 program.
      The major findings of the study were as follows:
      First, regarding Hypothesis 1, the students investigated were different from one another in social intelligence, career self-efficacy and school adjustment according to their personal background variables.
      As for differences by grade of school in Hypothesis 1-1, the middle schoolers were ahead of the high schoolers in social intelligence, career self-efficacy and school adjustment, which included social openness, vocational information, self-evaluation, target setting, future plans, and adjustment to school instruction, friends, teachers, school regulations and school environments. The former experienced more social anxiety than the latter.
      Concerning differences by residential areas in Hypothesis 1-2, the students from large urban communities excelled the others from small urban and rural areas in social intelligence, social perception, social self- efficacy, career self-efficacy, self-evaluation, target setting and adjust- ment to school instruction, friends, school regulations and school environments. The students from large urban areas adapted themselves the best to school and teachers, followed by those from rural regions and those from small urban communities.
      As to differences by academic achievement in Hypothesis 1-3, the high-ranking students surpassed the intermediate and low-ranking groups in social intelligence, career self-efficacy, school adjustment and all the subfactors. But there was no intergroup gap in social anxiety and friend adjustment. In regard to the influence of living together with parents, the students who lived with their real parents were most excellent in social intelligence and social perception. Those who lived with step parents were significantly better at career self-efficacy, target setting and future plans. The students who lived with their real parents acquired better vocational information than those from single-parent families. The students whose parents were absent scored lowest in all the regards except problem solving. The students from intact families adjusted themselves the best to school, school instruction and friends.
      As for the impact of parent occupation in Hypothesis 1-5, the students whose fathers and mothers were professionals and semi-professionals respectively had the highest social intelligence. The students whose fathers and mothers were in management post had the best career self- efficacy. The students whose fathers were professionals were most excellent in school adjustment, followed by those whose fathers were in management post, and the students whose mothers were semi- professionals(technicians) were the best in terms of school adjustment. In other words, the students whose parents had a stable profession were excellent in social intelligence, career self-efficacy and school adjustment.
      In relation to the impact of the academic background of parents in Hypothesis 1-6, the students whose fathers and mothers graduated from graduate school and college respectively had the highest social intelligence, and those whose parents stopped at middle school had the lowest social intelligence. In terms of career self-efficacy, the students whose fathers and mothers graduated from graduate schools were the best. The students whose fathers and mothers graduated from graduate school and college respectively adapted themselves the best to school, school instruction, friends, school regulations and school environments. Accordingly, the academic background of parents made a significant difference to their social intelligence, career self-efficacy and school adjustment.
      Second, as for correlation between social intelligence, career self- efficacy and school adjustment in Hypothesis 2, there was the strongest correlation between school adjustment and teacher adjustment and the weakest correlation between problem solving and the efficiency of social behavior. As to the relationship of social intelligence, career self-efficacy and the subfactors of the two to school adjustment, there was the closest correlation between social intelligence and school adjustment and the weakest correlation between social openness and teacher adjustment. It indicated that an improved social intelligence could lead to better school adjustment. Specifically, the students who were more open socially and consequently more flexible found it more difficult to fit in with teachers.
      Third, in regard to the influence of the subfactors of social intelligence and career self-efficacy on school adjustment in Hypothesis 3, self- evaluation had the greatest impact on that, followed by social self- efficacy, social perception, social anxiety and the efficiency of social behavior. Thus, most of the social-intelligence subfactors exercised an influence on school adjustment. Overall, self-evaluation and social self- efficacy that denoted belief and confidence in one's own ability had the greatest impact on school adjustment and its subfactors. In order to boost

      더보기

      국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      오늘날 중고등학교 청소년들의 학교적응의 중요성을 인식하여 아직 연구가 미흡하지만 중요한 적응능력의 하나로 인식되는 사회지능과 진로자기효능감을 관련변인으로 하여 학교적응과의 관계 연구를 실시하였다.
      사회지능과 진로자기효능감, 학교적응은 개인적 배경요인(학교급별, 지역별, 학업성취별, 동거부모의 유형별, 부모의 직업과 학력별)에 따라 많은 차이를 나타내며, 변인 상호간에는 유의미한 정적 상관성이 검증되었고, 각각의 변인에 상호 영향을 주고 있음을 확인할 수 있었다.
      번역하기

      오늘날 중고등학교 청소년들의 학교적응의 중요성을 인식하여 아직 연구가 미흡하지만 중요한 적응능력의 하나로 인식되는 사회지능과 진로자기효능감을 관련변인으로 하여 학교적응과의...

      오늘날 중고등학교 청소년들의 학교적응의 중요성을 인식하여 아직 연구가 미흡하지만 중요한 적응능력의 하나로 인식되는 사회지능과 진로자기효능감을 관련변인으로 하여 학교적응과의 관계 연구를 실시하였다.
      사회지능과 진로자기효능감, 학교적응은 개인적 배경요인(학교급별, 지역별, 학업성취별, 동거부모의 유형별, 부모의 직업과 학력별)에 따라 많은 차이를 나타내며, 변인 상호간에는 유의미한 정적 상관성이 검증되었고, 각각의 변인에 상호 영향을 주고 있음을 확인할 수 있었다.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 내용 = 6
      • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 7
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 8
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 내용 = 6
      • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 7
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 8
      • 1. 사회지능 = 8
      • 2. 진로 자기효능감 = 13
      • 3. 학교적응 = 16
      • 4. 선행연구의 고찰 = 21
      • 5. 연구 가설의 설정 근거 = 31
      • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 = 36
      • 1. 연구 대상 = 36
      • 2. 연구 도구 = 39
      • 3. 자료의 처리 = 44
      • Ⅳ. 가설검증 및 해석 = 46
      • 1. 사회지능, 진로 자기효능감, 학교적응의 배경요인별 차이 분석 = 46
      • 2. 사회지능, 진로 자기효능감, 학교적응의 상호상관 분석 = 83
      • 3. 사회지능, 진로 자기효능감이 학교적응에 미치는 영향력 분석 = 86
      • 4. 사회지능, 학교적응이 진로 자기효능감에 미치는 영향력 분석 = 93
      • 5. 사회지능, 진로 자기효능감이 학업성취별 상·중·하집단의 학교적응에 미치는 영향력 분석 = 95
      • Ⅴ. 논의 = 101
      • Ⅵ. 요약 및 결론 = 119
      • 1. 요약 = 119
      • 2. 결론 = 133
      • 3. 제언 = 142
      • 참고문헌 = 145
      • ABSTRACT = 157
      • 부록 = 163
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼