RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Bloom의 신 교육목표분류학에 근거한 지리 수업 목표 진술 및 평가 문항 작성 = The Statement of Geography Instruction Objectives and the Creation

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11206708

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      대구 : 경북대학교 교육대학원, 2008

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문 (석사) -- 경북대학교 교육대학원 , 지리교육전공 , 2008. 2

    • 발행연도

      2008

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • DDC

      910 판사항(22)

    • 발행국(도시)

      대구

    • 형태사항

      79 p. : 삽도 ; 26 cm.

    • 일반주기명

      참고문헌: p. 62-67

    • 소장기관
      • 경북대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives is constituted with two dimensional structures. That is, one is dimension of knowledge(factual knowledge, conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, meta-cognitive knowledge) made of noun and the other is dimension of cognitive processing(remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate, create) made of verb. This study draws a conclusion by stating the objective of instruction based on revision of Bloom's Taxonomy, making testing questions that are proper to conceptional knowledge among stated objectives into multiple choice and subjective questions and implementing the actual assessment with unit 5 'resource development and industrial development' in geography domain of social studies at the 3rd grade of middle school.

    By stating the objectives of instruction based on revision of Bloom's Taxonomy, the result was that hierarchy of content and behaviour gets more definite and clearer. But, some problems emerged in applying revision of Bloom's Taxonomy to the subject. In the processing of stating the objectives of instruction according to all items, there were some cases that dimension of knowledge and cognitive processing such as stated objective 6(creation of factual knowledge) and 12(creation of conceptual knowledge) connected unnaturally. Also, there were statements of objective that were fell into detailed content of items; 3(application of factual knowledge), 5( assessment of factual knowledge).

    In addition to, I wrote out multiple choices and subjective questions respectively according to conceptual knowledge among four kinds of knowledge, chose four classes with the similar average of middle exam and implemented the assessment. As a result of this research the percentage of correct answer on the multiple choice questions was estimated as 73%, 63%, 70%, 93%, 73% by turns from remember to evaluate. It is thought that the difference with the percentage of correct answer resulted from degree of difficulty rather than the correlation with the percentage of correct answer between items. There was gap of degree in the case of the percentage of correct answer both in multiple choice and subjective questions but, in all questions, the percentage of correct answer in multiple choice questions was estimated high. Especially, in the case of subjective questions, degree of that tendency emerged remarkably which is thought because the students were not accustomed to subjective questions.
    번역하기

    Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives is constituted with two dimensional structures. That is, one is dimension of knowledge(factual knowledge, conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, meta-cognitive knowledge) made of noun and the...

    Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives is constituted with two dimensional structures. That is, one is dimension of knowledge(factual knowledge, conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, meta-cognitive knowledge) made of noun and the other is dimension of cognitive processing(remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate, create) made of verb. This study draws a conclusion by stating the objective of instruction based on revision of Bloom's Taxonomy, making testing questions that are proper to conceptional knowledge among stated objectives into multiple choice and subjective questions and implementing the actual assessment with unit 5 'resource development and industrial development' in geography domain of social studies at the 3rd grade of middle school.

    By stating the objectives of instruction based on revision of Bloom's Taxonomy, the result was that hierarchy of content and behaviour gets more definite and clearer. But, some problems emerged in applying revision of Bloom's Taxonomy to the subject. In the processing of stating the objectives of instruction according to all items, there were some cases that dimension of knowledge and cognitive processing such as stated objective 6(creation of factual knowledge) and 12(creation of conceptual knowledge) connected unnaturally. Also, there were statements of objective that were fell into detailed content of items; 3(application of factual knowledge), 5( assessment of factual knowledge).

    In addition to, I wrote out multiple choices and subjective questions respectively according to conceptual knowledge among four kinds of knowledge, chose four classes with the similar average of middle exam and implemented the assessment. As a result of this research the percentage of correct answer on the multiple choice questions was estimated as 73%, 63%, 70%, 93%, 73% by turns from remember to evaluate. It is thought that the difference with the percentage of correct answer resulted from degree of difficulty rather than the correlation with the percentage of correct answer between items. There was gap of degree in the case of the percentage of correct answer both in multiple choice and subjective questions but, in all questions, the percentage of correct answer in multiple choice questions was estimated high. Especially, in the case of subjective questions, degree of that tendency emerged remarkably which is thought because the students were not accustomed to subjective questions.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서 론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 내용과 연구 방법 = 3
    • 3. 선행 연구 = 4
    • Ⅱ. 교육목표 분류학에 따른 수업목표 = 6
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 내용과 연구 방법 = 3
    • 3. 선행 연구 = 4
    • Ⅱ. 교육목표 분류학에 따른 수업목표 = 6
    • 1. Bloom의 교육목표분류학의 특성과 문제점 = 6
    • 1) 교육목표분류학의 필요성과 특징 = 6
    • 2) 교육목표분류학의 이론적․현실적 문제점 = 9
    • 2. Bloom의 신 교육목표분류학 이론 = 14
    • Ⅲ. 평가목표로서의 수업목표의 의미와 평가문항 작성의 원리 = 20
    • 1. 평가목표로서의 수업목표의 의미 = 20
    • 2. 선다형 문항 작성의 원리와 절차 = 21
    • 3. 서답형 문항 작성의 원리와 절차 = 23
    • Ⅳ. 지리 수업목표의 진술 및 평가문항 작성의 실제 = 27
    • 1. 신 교육목표분류학에 근거한 지리 수업목표 진술의 실제 = 27
    • 2. 신 교육목표분류학에 근거한 평가문항 작성과 평가결과 = 33
    • 3. 토론: 신 교육목표분류학 적용의 의의와 한계 = 54
    • Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론 = 59
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼