洪大容의 燕行錄 硏究 = (A)study on the Hongdaeyong's Yeonhaengrok

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This thesis develops the writing style and the recognition of China on the Yeonhaengrok of Hong daeyong.
First, the writing background was reviewed. Hongdaeyong’s Yeonhaengrok had a critical mind on hwayi(華夷) theory that had glaring contradiction on the time, and the purpose of Yeonhaengrok is to overcome this contradiction. His Yeonhaengrok is greatly influenced by Gyemitongsinsaheangrok.
Second, writing and transmission process was presumed. His three Yeonhaengroks showed that his Yeonhaengrok was developed by 4 stage.
Hongdaeyong wrote Ganjeongdongpildam right after his travel, and wrote Yeongi. Eulbyungyeonhaengrok was written by Korean as well as Chinese. Damheonseo was edited and published by his descendants. As shown above Hongdaeyong’s Yeonhangrok was written by various channels for a long time compared to other Yeonhangroks.
Third, a rhetorical device and construction method was studied. Hongdaeyong tried various style of writing to find out new meaning of writing in Yeonhangrok. He tried realistic description on the characteristics of the objects as well as it’s appearance in detail.
In terms of construction, Hongdaeyong’s Yeonhangrok has it’s characteristics in writing three Yeongangrok. Hwewoorok was written by the collection of the conversation by writing with Chinese intellectuals, and it aims to emphasize the value of the conversation by writing during the travel. Yeongi reformed the construction method of Yeonhangrok that was familiar to Chinese intellectuals. Eulbyungyeonheangrok aim at the entire revival of the travel, and expansion of the readers for Korean intellectuals.
Fourth, The recognition of the china and it’s characteristics were reviewd. The purpose of the new understanding on the China was clarified, and varies the way of recognition of China. Hongdaeyong tried to understand China systematically with the way of Bird’s-eye view, analysis, contrast, distinction, and communication.
Last, the influence of the Hongdayong’s Yeonhaegrok on the descendants were reviewed. Hongdaeyong’s yeongangrok had influenced on the writing of the both Parkjiwon and Parjega in the way of travel and experience. Hongdaeyong’s exchange with Chinese intellectuals through travel started the vigorous cultural exchange between Korean and Chinese intellectuals. Hongdaeyong’s Yeonhaengrok also contributed to the logicalty of The Northern School that was completed by Parkjiwon and Parkjaega.
In Summary, Hongdaeyong’s Yeonhaeongrok written on late medieval times can be the vivid records of ideological groping for the establishment of ex-hwayi theory, and the text that innovate the writing style of Yeonhaegrok.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 緖論 = 1
• 1. 연구 목적과 연구사 검토 = 1
• 2. 연구 방향 = 8
• Ⅱ. 著述 背景 = 10
• 1. 朝鮮後期 華夷論의 動搖와 燕行錄의 轉變 = 10
• 2. 18세기 通信使行錄 著述傾向의 多邊化 = 18
• Ⅲ. 텍스트의 生成과 傳承 = 29
• 1. 異本 對照 = 29
• 2. 텍스트의 著作과 傳承過程 = 53
• Ⅳ. 修辭的 特徵과 構成 方式 = 58
• 1. 修辭的 特徵 = 58
• 1) 입체적 글쓰기와 意味 再構成 = 58
• 2) 名物度數學的 敍述과 知識의 生成 = 68
• 2. 構成 方式과 意圖 = 81
• 1) 筆談·尺牘의 交流와 엮음: 『會友錄』 = 83
• 2) 見聞의 範疇化와 中國 認識의 提高: 『燕記』 = 101
• 3) 總體的 構成과 國文 著述: 『을병연행록』 = 105
• Ⅴ. 中國 認識의 方向과 特徵 = 114
• 1. 中國 認識의 轉換 摸索 = 115
• 2. 中國 認識의 方法的 多樣化 = 119
• 1) 鳥瞰과 全體的 規模 認識 = 120
• 2) 分析과 세밀한 心法 把握 = 124
• 3) 對比와 相對的 認識 = 127
• 4) 區別과 對中 認識의 矯正 = 134
• 5) 疏通과 實踐的 認識 = 136
• Ⅵ. 後代 燕行錄에 끼친 影響 = 140
• 1. 見聞 目的과 方式의 多邊化 = 140
• 2. 筆談과 問答體 散文의 活用 = 150
• 3. 脫華夷論의 構想과 北學論의 礎石 = 153
• Ⅶ. 결론 = 170
• 참고문헌 = 178
• ABSTRACT = 188