RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    학습 몰입의 구조: 척도, 성격, 조건, 관여 = The Structure of Learning Flow: Scale, Character, Condition, Involvement

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11015372

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to examine the structure of learning flow whether the flow in learning situation had different characteristics comparing with general flow. I have 4 sub-purpose: (1) First purpose is to develop the Learning Flow Scale that can measure flow level in real learning situation. (2) Second purpose is to examine the character of learning flow, (3) Third purpose is to examine variables of family and school influencing the learning flow experience and verify optimal conditions that can experience flow in learning situation. (4) Fourth purpose is to verify involvement of learning flow at the point that variables of family and school influence learning achievement. Through this purpose, I selected 4 research problem.
    This study was administered to 980 6th grade and 181 5th grade elementary school students. Statistical methods were conducted item analysis, Exploratory Factor Analysis(EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA), and structural equation model in Study I. Analysis methods in Study II and Study III were conducted ANOVA, regression analysis, frequency analysis, t-test, correlation analysis, and post hoc test. And finally, path analysis was conducted in Study IV.
    The result of this study was the follows. In Study I, I developed and validated the Learning Flow Scale, examined validation of high-order factor model for the Learning Flow Scale, and verified a causal relation among factors of the Learning Flow Scale.
    To develop the Learning Flow Scale First, based on the results of literature review, I identified 9 components of Csikszentmihalyi's flow construct and developed the 200 pilot items. Analyzing the pilot test data, the result obtained 51 items, 8 factors except 'Transformation of Time' of Csikszentmihalyi's 9 flow factors. Based on theory, I added 19 items and conducted 70 items in main test. Analyzing the main test data, the result obtained 49 items, 9 factors. Conducting Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA), improving goodness of fit of the model, and modifying the model, the result obtained 35 items, 9 factors as the final learning flow scale. As a result of Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA), the goodness of fit indices(GFI, AGFI, CFI, RMSEA) demonstrated statistically significance and fitness of the model. The final Learning Flow Scale supported Csikszentmihalyi's 9 flow factors. The Learning Flow Scale can be used as a valid instrument to measure flow level in the learning situation.
    To test validation of high-order factor model for the Learning Flow Scale, I conducted 2 order CFA. The result obtained 2 factor(affective domain and cognitive domain) 2 order factor model. The goodness of fit indices(GFI, AGFI, CFI, RMSEA) demonstrated statistically significance and fitness of the model. The affective domain was included concentration on task at hand, loss of self-consciousness, transformation of time, and autotelic experience factor. The cognitive domain was included challenge-skill balance, action-awareness merge, clear goals, unambiguous feedback, and sense of control factor.
    To test the causal relation among factors of the Learning Flow Scale, I conducted structural equation model. As a result, if a activity has challenge-skill balance, clear goals, and unambiguous feedback, it is easy to appear action-awareness merge, transformation of time, sense of control, loss of self-consciousness, and concentration on task at hand. It is easy happen autotelic experience in terms of action-awareness merge, transformation of time, sense of control, loss of self-consciousness, and concentration on task at hand. Autotelic experience is a final result of 8 factors.
    In Study II, I verified 4 sub-study: a relationship between learning motivation and learning flow, the relationship among learning motivation, learning flow, and learning achievement, the relationship between challenge and ability in learning flow state, and frequency of learning flow experience to subject matter. First, I examined a relationship between learning motivation and learning flow. As the result, The students who had intrinsic motivation had high level of learning flow significantly. Second, I examined the relationship among learning motivation, learning flow and learning achievement. As the result, those who had high level of learning flow and intrinsic motivation had high learning achievement.
    Third, as the result of frequency analysis of learning flow on subject matters, the frequency of learning flow was high in physical education, mathematics, and science. Fourth, I conducted regression analysis to examine the relationship between challenge and ability in learning flow state. The result appeared that students experienced learning flow when one's ability was higher than challenge.
    In Study III, I examined the follows: (1) the relationship between demographic variables and learning flow, (2) the relationship between family challenge-support and learning flow, (3) the relationship between learning place and learning flow, and (4) the relationship between school challenge-support and learning flow. First, I conducted ANOVA to examine level of learning flow on gender, the number of family, education level of parents, and economic level. Those who had high economic level had high level of learning flow. Second, As a result of examining the relationship between family challenge-support and learning flow, those who had high family challenge and high family support had high level of learning flow.
    Third, I conducted frequency analysis to examine the relationship between learning place and learning flow. As the result, the students had the highest learning flow frequency in school. Fourth, As a result of examining the relationship between school challenge-support and learning flow, those who had high school challenge and support had high level of learning flow. In instructional formats, the frequency of learning flow was high in group work and individual work. The frequency of learning flow for the learning activity of students was high in physical activity and thinking activity.
    In Study IV, I examined a causal relation among family, school, learning flow and learning achievement. The result appeared that the higher were family challenge and school support, the higher were the learning flow and learning achievement. The challenge and support of family and school didn't influence directly learning achievement. Through the results of this study, when school and family support and stimulate students to experience learning flow, they will enjoy learning and improve their ability. Furthermore, the self of students will grow.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to examine the structure of learning flow whether the flow in learning situation had different characteristics comparing with general flow. I have 4 sub-purpose: (1) First purpose is to develop the Learning Flow Scale tha...

    The purpose of this study was to examine the structure of learning flow whether the flow in learning situation had different characteristics comparing with general flow. I have 4 sub-purpose: (1) First purpose is to develop the Learning Flow Scale that can measure flow level in real learning situation. (2) Second purpose is to examine the character of learning flow, (3) Third purpose is to examine variables of family and school influencing the learning flow experience and verify optimal conditions that can experience flow in learning situation. (4) Fourth purpose is to verify involvement of learning flow at the point that variables of family and school influence learning achievement. Through this purpose, I selected 4 research problem.
    This study was administered to 980 6th grade and 181 5th grade elementary school students. Statistical methods were conducted item analysis, Exploratory Factor Analysis(EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA), and structural equation model in Study I. Analysis methods in Study II and Study III were conducted ANOVA, regression analysis, frequency analysis, t-test, correlation analysis, and post hoc test. And finally, path analysis was conducted in Study IV.
    The result of this study was the follows. In Study I, I developed and validated the Learning Flow Scale, examined validation of high-order factor model for the Learning Flow Scale, and verified a causal relation among factors of the Learning Flow Scale.
    To develop the Learning Flow Scale First, based on the results of literature review, I identified 9 components of Csikszentmihalyi's flow construct and developed the 200 pilot items. Analyzing the pilot test data, the result obtained 51 items, 8 factors except 'Transformation of Time' of Csikszentmihalyi's 9 flow factors. Based on theory, I added 19 items and conducted 70 items in main test. Analyzing the main test data, the result obtained 49 items, 9 factors. Conducting Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA), improving goodness of fit of the model, and modifying the model, the result obtained 35 items, 9 factors as the final learning flow scale. As a result of Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA), the goodness of fit indices(GFI, AGFI, CFI, RMSEA) demonstrated statistically significance and fitness of the model. The final Learning Flow Scale supported Csikszentmihalyi's 9 flow factors. The Learning Flow Scale can be used as a valid instrument to measure flow level in the learning situation.
    To test validation of high-order factor model for the Learning Flow Scale, I conducted 2 order CFA. The result obtained 2 factor(affective domain and cognitive domain) 2 order factor model. The goodness of fit indices(GFI, AGFI, CFI, RMSEA) demonstrated statistically significance and fitness of the model. The affective domain was included concentration on task at hand, loss of self-consciousness, transformation of time, and autotelic experience factor. The cognitive domain was included challenge-skill balance, action-awareness merge, clear goals, unambiguous feedback, and sense of control factor.
    To test the causal relation among factors of the Learning Flow Scale, I conducted structural equation model. As a result, if a activity has challenge-skill balance, clear goals, and unambiguous feedback, it is easy to appear action-awareness merge, transformation of time, sense of control, loss of self-consciousness, and concentration on task at hand. It is easy happen autotelic experience in terms of action-awareness merge, transformation of time, sense of control, loss of self-consciousness, and concentration on task at hand. Autotelic experience is a final result of 8 factors.
    In Study II, I verified 4 sub-study: a relationship between learning motivation and learning flow, the relationship among learning motivation, learning flow, and learning achievement, the relationship between challenge and ability in learning flow state, and frequency of learning flow experience to subject matter. First, I examined a relationship between learning motivation and learning flow. As the result, The students who had intrinsic motivation had high level of learning flow significantly. Second, I examined the relationship among learning motivation, learning flow and learning achievement. As the result, those who had high level of learning flow and intrinsic motivation had high learning achievement.
    Third, as the result of frequency analysis of learning flow on subject matters, the frequency of learning flow was high in physical education, mathematics, and science. Fourth, I conducted regression analysis to examine the relationship between challenge and ability in learning flow state. The result appeared that students experienced learning flow when one's ability was higher than challenge.
    In Study III, I examined the follows: (1) the relationship between demographic variables and learning flow, (2) the relationship between family challenge-support and learning flow, (3) the relationship between learning place and learning flow, and (4) the relationship between school challenge-support and learning flow. First, I conducted ANOVA to examine level of learning flow on gender, the number of family, education level of parents, and economic level. Those who had high economic level had high level of learning flow. Second, As a result of examining the relationship between family challenge-support and learning flow, those who had high family challenge and high family support had high level of learning flow.
    Third, I conducted frequency analysis to examine the relationship between learning place and learning flow. As the result, the students had the highest learning flow frequency in school. Fourth, As a result of examining the relationship between school challenge-support and learning flow, those who had high school challenge and support had high level of learning flow. In instructional formats, the frequency of learning flow was high in group work and individual work. The frequency of learning flow for the learning activity of students was high in physical activity and thinking activity.
    In Study IV, I examined a causal relation among family, school, learning flow and learning achievement. The result appeared that the higher were family challenge and school support, the higher were the learning flow and learning achievement. The challenge and support of family and school didn't influence directly learning achievement. Through the results of this study, when school and family support and stimulate students to experience learning flow, they will enjoy learning and improve their ability. Furthermore, the self of students will grow.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목 차
    • I. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적 6
    • 목 차
    • I. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적 6
    • 3. 연구 문제 9
    • 4. 용어의 정의 11
    • II. 이론적 배경 12
    • 1. 몰입 12
    • 1) 몰입의 개념과 유사개념 13
    • 2) 몰입의 특성과 구성 요소 18
    • 3) 몰입의 조건과 방법 30
    • 4) 몰입의 측정방법 39
    • 5) 몰입 척도의 선행연구 42
    • 2. 학습 동기와 학습 몰입 및 학업성취도 45
    • 1) 동기의 개념과 유형 46
    • 2) 학습 동기와 성취 49
    • 3) 몰입의 도전-능력 모델 55
    • 4) 학습 동기와 학습 몰입 및 학업성취도의 선행연구 60
    • 3. 가정과 학교 및 학습 몰입 63
    • 1) 가정과 학습 몰입 64
    • 2) 학교와 학습 몰입 68
    • 3) 가정과 학교 및 학습 몰입의 선행연구 76
    • III. 연구 방법 81
    • 1. 연구 대상 81
    • 2. 측정 도구 82
    • 3. 연구 절차 89
    • 4. 분석 방법 93
    • IV. 연구 결과 92
    • 1. 학습 몰입 척도의 개발 및 인과관계 96
    • 1) 학습 몰입 척도의 신뢰성 및 타당성 96
    • 2) 학습 몰입 척도의 고차요인모델 타당성 108
    • 3) 학습 몰입 척도의 요인들 간의 인과관계 112
    • 2. 학습 동기와 학습 몰입 및 학업성취도와의 관계 114
    • 1) 학습 동기와 학습 몰입과의 관계 115
    • 2) 학습 동기와 학습 몰입 및 학업성취도와의 관계 119
    • 3) 교과목과 학습 몰입과의 관계 120
    • 4) 학습 몰입의 도전과 능력과의 관계 121
    • 3. 가정과 학교 및 학습 몰입과의 관계 123
    • 1) 인구통계학적 변인과 학습 몰입과의 관계 123
    • 2) 가정의 도전-지원과 학습 몰입과의 관계 124
    • 3) 학습 장소와 학습 몰입과의 관계 127
    • 4) 학교의 도전-지원과 학습 몰입과의 관계 127
    • 4. 가정과 학교, 학습 몰입 및 학업성취도 간의 인과관계 138
    • V. 논 의 142
    • VI. 결론 및 제언 168
    • 참 고 문 헌 182
    • 영문초록 194
    • 부 록 197
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1. Helplessness, Seligman, M. E, , 1975

    2. Personal caustion, deCharms, , 1968

    3. The Evolving Self, Kegan, , 1982

    4. Teaching Creativity, Ripple, , 1999

    5. The subject matters, Stodolsky, , 1988

    6. Cooperative learning, Slavin, Robert E, Longman, Cooperative Learning, , 1983

    7. 교실에서의 동기, 김아영, 한국교육심리학회, "교육심리연구, , 2003

    8. Human Motivation(2nd Ed), Franken, , 2002

    9. The practice of teaching, Jackson, Philip W, Teachers College Press, The Practice of teaching, , 1986

    10. Beyond boredom and anxiety, Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, Jossey-Bass Publishers, Beyond boredom and anxiety, , 1975

    1. Helplessness, Seligman, M. E, , 1975

    2. Personal caustion, deCharms, , 1968

    3. The Evolving Self, Kegan, , 1982

    4. Teaching Creativity, Ripple, , 1999

    5. The subject matters, Stodolsky, , 1988

    6. Cooperative learning, Slavin, Robert E, Longman, Cooperative Learning, , 1983

    7. 교실에서의 동기, 김아영, 한국교육심리학회, "교육심리연구, , 2003

    8. Human Motivation(2nd Ed), Franken, , 2002

    9. The practice of teaching, Jackson, Philip W, Teachers College Press, The Practice of teaching, , 1986

    10. Beyond boredom and anxiety, Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, Jossey-Bass Publishers, Beyond boredom and anxiety, , 1975

    11. Finding flow in Montessori, Kahn, , 1997

    12. 영재와 부진아 교육, 이중석, , 1999

    13. LISREL 구조방정식모델, 배병렬, LISREL 구조방정식모델, , 2006

    14. Adolescents and their families, Hauser, , 1991

    15. Educational Psychology(8th Ed.), Woolfolk, , 2001

    16. Interest, Learning, and Motivation, Ulrich Schiefele, "Interest, , 1991

    17. Curriculum standards for grades 5-8, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, , 1996

    18. The dynamics of intrinsic motivation, Csikszentmihalyi, Nakamura, , 1989

    19. Why we do what we do. New York: G. P, Deci, , 1995

    20. Flow in Computer-MediatedCommunication, Webster, Trevino, Flow in computer-mediated communication, , 1992

    21. Protagoras and meno(W. Guthrie, Trans.), Poincare, "Protagoras and meno(W. Guthrie, , 1952

    22. Attachment and loss . Vol.1 , Attachment, Bowlby, John, Basic Books, Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment, , 1982

    23. Towards a psychology of optimal experience, Csikszentmihalyi, , 1982

    24. Flow : the psychology of optimal experience, Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, Harper & Row, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, , 1990

    25. 교수몰입 척도의 개발 및 타당화, 최기연, 이화여자대학교 대학원, 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문, , 2005

    26. Measuring intrinsic motivation in everyday life, McManama-Gianinno, Csikszentmihalyi, Graef, , 1983

    27. Achieving flow in an online learning environment, Pearce, , 2004

    28. Handbook for differential education of the gifted, Verduin, Jellin, , 1986

    29. 학습몰입검사의 제작 및 타당화 연구, 김나현, 淑明女子大學校 大學院, 숙명여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문, , 2005

    30. Being adolescent: Conflict and growth in teenage years, Rarson, Csikszentmihalyi, , 1984

    31. Psychological antecedents of flow in recreational sport, Daniels, Kimiecik, Jackson, Stein, , 1995

    32. 몰입에 대한 학습 동기와 인지전략과의 관계, 이은주, , 2001

    33. 창의력-문제발견학습을 위한(몰입-정상학습), 이중석, , 2001

    34. Becoming adult : how teenagers prepare for the world of work, Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, Basic Books, Becoming adult: How teenagers prepare for the world of work, , 2000

    35. Flow in adolescence and its relation to the school experience, Mayers, P., , 1978

    36. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior, Deci, Edward L, Plenum, Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior, , 1985

    37. Talented teenagers: A longitudinal study of their development, Whalen, Csikszentmihalyi, Rathunde, , 1993

    38. Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation, Deci.E.M, , 1971

    39. Creativity : flow and the psychology of discovery and invention, Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, HarperCollinsPublishers, Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention, , 1996

    40. Flow in computer-mediated environments : Promises and challenges, Zhang, Finneran, , 2005

    41. Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations, Brophy, Brophy, J. E., , 1982

    42. Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, Vallerand, , 1997

    43. Family context and optimal experience in the development of talent, Rathunde, , 1989

    44. Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory, ura, Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory, , 1986

    45. A comprehensive dictionary ofpsychological and psychoanalytic terms, English, A comprehensive dictionary of psychological and psychoanalytic terms, , 1958

    46. The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finging in art, Csikszentmihalyi, Getzels, , 1976

    47. 정상학습 프로그램이 몰입수준 향상에 미치는 효과, 이미나, , 2002

    48. Entrepreneurs: Architects of innovation, paradigm pioneers and change, Winslow, Solomon, "Entrepreneurs: Architects of innovation, , 1988

    49. 제7차 초등학교 교육과정 해설(Ⅰ) - 총론 재량활동 -, 교육부, , 1998

    50. Work, leisure and psychological well-being in a sample of young adults, Hawroth, Hill, "Work, , 1992

    51. Characteristics of the rewarder and intrinsic motivation of the rewardee, Nezlec, Deci, Sheinman, , 1981

    52. Clas sroom learning and motivation : Clarifyingand expanding goal theory, Blumenfeld, P. C., Blumenfeld, Classroom learning and motivation: Clarifying and expanding goal theory, , 1992

    53. LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language, J?reskog, Sorbom, , 1997

    54. Turning work into play: implications for microcomputer software training, Webster, Martochio, , 1993

    55. Academic intrinsicmotivation in elementary and junior highschool students, Gottfried, Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students, , 1985

    56. Students' experience with research projects: pains, enjoyment and success, Larson, Norem, Hecker, "Students' experience with research projects: pains, , 1985

    57. Toward a Conceptual Understanding of the Flow Experience in Elite Athletes, Jackson, , 1996

    58. The monitoring of optimal experience: A tool for psychiatric rehabilitation, Csikszentmihalyi, Massimini, Carli, , 1987

    59. Being a teacher: Emotion and optimal experience while teaching gifted children, Coleman, , 1994

    60. Motivational determinants of flow: Contributions from self-determination theory, Kowal, Fortier, , 1999

    61. The Measurement of Flow in Everyday Life Toward a Theory of Emergent Motivation, Csikszentmihalyi, M., , 1993

    62. Interactionalsynchronyandtheoriginsofinfant-motherattachment:A replication study, Belsky, Isabella, R. A., Isabella, Interactional synchrony and the origins of infant-mother attachment: A replication study, , 1991

    63. 몰입수준의 변화가 수학성취도 및 수학적 태도에 미치는 효과, 이미현, , 2003

    64. Athletes in flow: A qualitative investigation of flowstates in elite figure skaters, Wagner, , 1990

    65. The effect of perceived challenge and skills on the quality of subjective experience, Moneta, Csikszentmihalyi, , 1996

    66. Rearing competent children In child development today and tomorrow, edited by W, Damon, Baumrind, "Rearing competent children In child development today and tomorrow, , 1989

    67. Employee-organization linkages : the psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover, Mowday, Richard T, Academic Press, "Employee organization linkages: the psychology of commitment, , 1982

    68. The Work Preference Inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations, Amabile, E.M.Tighe, The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations, , 1994

    69. Task enjoyment and mathematical achievement, doctoral dissertation, Department of Education, Heine, "Task enjoyment and mathematical achievement, , 1997

    70. Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains, Ryan, Connell, Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains, , 1989

    71. Interest and talent development: a longitudinal study of talented teenagers and their families, Rathunde, Csikszentmihalyi, , 1991

    72. Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: Anextension of cognitive evaluation theory, Ryan, Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory, , 1982

    73. Developing conceptions of classroom environments: Some light on the T in classroom studies of ATI, Berliner, , 1983

    74. Peak experience, peak performance, and flow: A comparative analysis of positive human experiences, Privett, "Peak experience, , 1983

    75. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior, Deci, E. L., "The ""what"" and ""why"" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior", , 2000

    76. Csikszentmihalyi's state of flow and effective teaching, doctoral dissertation, Department of Education, Gunderson, "Csikszentmihalyi's state of flow and effective teaching, , 2003

    77. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals Handbook 1, Cognitive Domain, Bloom, Englehart, Hill, Furst, Krathwohl, "Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals Handbook 1, , 1956

    78. Flow experience in sport: construct validation of multidimensional, hierarchical state and trait responses, Jackson, Marsh, "Flow experience in sport: construct validation of multidimensional, , 1999

    79. Paradigms for research on teacher effectiveness. In L. S. Shulman(Ed.), Review of Research in Education, 5, Doyle, "Paradigms for research on teacher effectiveness. In L. S. Shulman(Ed.), , 1978

    80. The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human computer interactions. Computer in Human Behavior, 9(4), Webster, Trevino, Ryan, "The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human computer interactions. Computer in Human Behavior, , 1993

    81. 컴퓨터 몰입 요인구조의 타당성에 관한 연구: 신뢰도 및 타당도 분석을 중심으로, 박근수, , 2002

    82. Visitors' flow experience while browsing a web site: its measurement, contributing factors, and consequences, Kimmel, Skadberg Y.X, "Visitors' flow experience while browsing a web Site : Its measurement, , 2004

    83. Turning play into work: Effects of adult surveillance and extrinsic towards on children's intrinsic motivation, Greene, Lepper, , 1978

    84. Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic rewards: A test of the "overjustification" hypothesis, Greene, Nisbett, Lepper, "Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic rewards: A test of the ""overjustification hypothesis", , 1973

    85. The Systematic assessment of flow in daily experience. Optimal Experience; Psychological studies of flow in consciousness, Massimini, Carli, , 1988

    86. Bosozoku: Flow in japanese motorcycle gangs. In Optimal Experience, edited by M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi, Sato, "Bosozoku: Flow in japanese motorcycle gangs. In Optimal Experience, , 1988

    87. Designing for flow in a complex activity. Paper presented at the 6th Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, Pearce, Howard, , 2004

    88. Between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Examination of reasons for academic study based on the theory of internalization, Hayamizu, Between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Examination of reasons for academic study based on the theory of internalization, , 1997

    89. A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components, Hater, , 1981

    90. Exploring optimal personality development: A longitudinal study of adolescents doctoral dissertation, Department of Education, Hektner, "Exploring optimal personality development: A longitudinal study of adolescents doctoral dissertation, , 1996

    91. How time is used in elementary schools: The activity structure of classroom. In L. W. Anderson(Ed.), Time and school learning, Burns, "How time is used in elementary schools: The activity structure of classroom. In L. W. Anderson(Ed.), , 1984

    92. Task engagement and the consistency of pedagogical controls: An ecological study of differently structured classroom settings, Grannis, , 1978

    93. Within you, without you: The social psychology of creativity, and beyond. In M. A. Runco & R. S.(Eds), Theories of creativity, Amabile, "Within you, , 1990

    94. Variables affecting students' intrinsic motivation for school mathematics: Two empirical studies based on Deci and Ryan's theory of motivation, Valas, Sovik, , 1993

    95. Between extrinsic and intrinsic motivation: Examination on individual beliefs of the links between both motivation. Bulletin of the School of Education, Hayamizu, , 1993

    96. Optimal experience and the family context. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. Csikszentmihalyi(Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness, Rathunde, "Optimal experience and the family context. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. Csikszentmihalyi(Eds.), , 1988

    97. A motivational analysis of self-determination and self-regulation in education. In C. Ames & R. Ames(Eds.), Research on motivation in education, 2(The classroom milieu), Ryan, Connell, Deci, "A motivational analysis of self-determination and self-regulation in education. In C. Ames & R. Ames(Eds.), , 1985

    98. Creative thinking, problem-solving, and instruction. In E. R. Hilgart(Ed.), Theories of learning and instruction, 63rd Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Getzels, "Creative thinking, , 1964

    99. The initiation and regulation of intrinsically motivated learning and achievement. In A. Boggiano & T. Pittman(Eds) Achievement and motivation: A social developmental perspective, 9-36, Deci, Ryan, "The initiation and regulation of intrinsically motivated learning and achievement. In A. Boggiano & T. Pittman(Eds) Achievement and motivation: A social developmental perspective, , 1992

    100. Conception of ability and achievement motivation: A theory and its implications for education. In S. Paris, G. Olson, & H. Stevenson(Eds.), Learning and motivation in the classroom, 211-237, Nicholls, "Conception of ability and achievement motivation: A theory and its implications for education. In S. Paris, , 1983

    101. Individually and Connectedness in the family as a context for adolescent identity formation and role-taking skill. In adolescent development in the family, edited by Grotevant, H. D. & Cooper, C. R, Condon, Grotevant, Cooper, "Individually and Connectedness in the family as a context for adolescent identity formation and role-taking skill. In adolescent development in the family, , 1983

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼