RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    협동학습기반 자기조절학습 방법이 인지양식에 따라 영어 학습에 미치는 효과 = (The)effects of cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning on English learning depending on cognitive style

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11007348

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      전주: 全北大学校, 2007

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(박사) -- 全北大学校 大学院 , 敎育學科 , 2007

    • 발행연도

      2007

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • KDC

      376.53 판사항(4)

    • DDC

      373.13 판사항(21)

    • 발행국(도시)

      전북특별자치도

    • 형태사항

      ix, 129장: 도표; 26 cm

    • 일반주기명

      권말부록으로 "인지양식 검사" 등 수록
      참고문헌: 장 91-104

    • 소장기관
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 전북대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning on English learning depending on cognitive style of middle school students.
    The research questions are proposed as follows:
    First, does cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning on English learning affect students' learning motivation depending on cognitive style?
    Second, does cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning on English learning affect students' self-efficacy depending on cognitive style?
    Third, does cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning on English learning affect students' learning achievement depending on cognitive style?
    On the basis of reviewed theories, the following hypotheses were formulated.
    Hypothesis 1: There would be gap of learning motivation score between each experimental group and controlled group.
    1-1. Depending on teaching method, motivation score would be different.
    1-2. Depending on cognitive style, motivation score would be different.
    1-3. The effect of interaction of teaching method and cognitive style would be appeared on learning motivation.
    Hypothesis 2: There would be gap of self-efficacy score between each experimental groups and controlled group.
    2-1. Depending on teaching method, self-efficacy score would be different.
    2-2. Depending on cognitive style, self-efficacy score would be different.
    2-3. The effect of interaction of teaching method and cognitive style would be appeared on self-efficacy.
    Hypothesis 3: There would be gap of learning achievement score between each experimental group and controlled group.
    3-1. Depending on teaching method, learning achievement score would be different.
    3-2. Depending on cognitive style, learning achievement score would be different.
    3-3. The effect of interaction of teaching method and cognitive style would be appeared on learning achievement.
    The subjects of the study are nine classes of 9th graders: three classes of 103 students being the experimental group Ⅰ, other three classes of 103 students being the experimental group Ⅱ, and the other three classes of 104 students being the controlled group. Each group went through four class a week for eight weeks. The experimental group Ⅰ went through classes based on cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning, and the experimental group Ⅱ went through classes based on self-regulated learning. And the controlled group went through lecture-type using traditional teaching method. Students' learning motivation, self-efficacy, and learning achievement of the each group were examined.
    To analyze the effect of cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning, two-way ANOVA and two-way ANCOVA were conducted by covariance of the preliminary points of students' learning motivation, self-efficacy, and learning achievement of the each group. The results of analyses are as follows:
    First, Cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning on English learning affect students' learning motivation score more than traditional style of teaching(teachers solely in charge of the classroom). And the field dependency and independency cognitive style affects the learning motivation of students. There was effect of interaction between teaching method and cognitive styles of students.
    Second, Cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning on English learning affect self-efficacy score more than traditional style of teaching. But the field dependency and independency cognitive style doesn't affect self-efficacy of students. There was no meaningful effect of interaction between teaching method and cognitive styles of students.
    Third, Cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning on English learning affect students' learning achievement score more than traditional teaching method. Also, self-regulated learning affect students' learning achievement score more than traditional style of teaching. But the field dependency and independency cognitive style affects the learning achievement of students. There was effect of interaction between teaching method and cognitive styles of students.
    The implication arisen from the results of this study indicate that language acquisition may be enhanced through the interaction of the student with other students, teachers and others inside and outside of the classroom. Therefore, an interactive approach to instruction, such as the cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning that requires students to work cooperatively rather than competitively is suggested for implementation in middle school.
    What we could not treat or what we found as problems in this research are the assignments for following researchers.
    번역하기

    The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning on English learning depending on cognitive style of middle school students. The research questions are proposed as follows: First, does cooperati...

    The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning on English learning depending on cognitive style of middle school students.
    The research questions are proposed as follows:
    First, does cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning on English learning affect students' learning motivation depending on cognitive style?
    Second, does cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning on English learning affect students' self-efficacy depending on cognitive style?
    Third, does cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning on English learning affect students' learning achievement depending on cognitive style?
    On the basis of reviewed theories, the following hypotheses were formulated.
    Hypothesis 1: There would be gap of learning motivation score between each experimental group and controlled group.
    1-1. Depending on teaching method, motivation score would be different.
    1-2. Depending on cognitive style, motivation score would be different.
    1-3. The effect of interaction of teaching method and cognitive style would be appeared on learning motivation.
    Hypothesis 2: There would be gap of self-efficacy score between each experimental groups and controlled group.
    2-1. Depending on teaching method, self-efficacy score would be different.
    2-2. Depending on cognitive style, self-efficacy score would be different.
    2-3. The effect of interaction of teaching method and cognitive style would be appeared on self-efficacy.
    Hypothesis 3: There would be gap of learning achievement score between each experimental group and controlled group.
    3-1. Depending on teaching method, learning achievement score would be different.
    3-2. Depending on cognitive style, learning achievement score would be different.
    3-3. The effect of interaction of teaching method and cognitive style would be appeared on learning achievement.
    The subjects of the study are nine classes of 9th graders: three classes of 103 students being the experimental group Ⅰ, other three classes of 103 students being the experimental group Ⅱ, and the other three classes of 104 students being the controlled group. Each group went through four class a week for eight weeks. The experimental group Ⅰ went through classes based on cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning, and the experimental group Ⅱ went through classes based on self-regulated learning. And the controlled group went through lecture-type using traditional teaching method. Students' learning motivation, self-efficacy, and learning achievement of the each group were examined.
    To analyze the effect of cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning, two-way ANOVA and two-way ANCOVA were conducted by covariance of the preliminary points of students' learning motivation, self-efficacy, and learning achievement of the each group. The results of analyses are as follows:
    First, Cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning on English learning affect students' learning motivation score more than traditional style of teaching(teachers solely in charge of the classroom). And the field dependency and independency cognitive style affects the learning motivation of students. There was effect of interaction between teaching method and cognitive styles of students.
    Second, Cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning on English learning affect self-efficacy score more than traditional style of teaching. But the field dependency and independency cognitive style doesn't affect self-efficacy of students. There was no meaningful effect of interaction between teaching method and cognitive styles of students.
    Third, Cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning on English learning affect students' learning achievement score more than traditional teaching method. Also, self-regulated learning affect students' learning achievement score more than traditional style of teaching. But the field dependency and independency cognitive style affects the learning achievement of students. There was effect of interaction between teaching method and cognitive styles of students.
    The implication arisen from the results of this study indicate that language acquisition may be enhanced through the interaction of the student with other students, teachers and others inside and outside of the classroom. Therefore, an interactive approach to instruction, such as the cooperative learning-based self-regulated learning that requires students to work cooperatively rather than competitively is suggested for implementation in middle school.
    What we could not treat or what we found as problems in this research are the assignments for following researchers.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 문제 = 6
    • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 7
    • 4. 용어의 정의 = 9
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 문제 = 6
    • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 7
    • 4. 용어의 정의 = 9
    • 가. 협동학습 기반 자기조절학습 수업 = 9
    • 나. 자기조절학습 기반 수업 = 9
    • 다. 인지양식 = 10
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 11
    • 1. 협동학습 이론 = 11
    • 가. 협동학습의 개념과 필요성 = 11
    • 나. 협동학습의 특징과 장점 = 13
    • 다. 협동학습의 의의 = 16
    • 라. 메타인지전략과 협동학습과의 관계 = 17
    • 마. 협동학습 모형 = 18
    • 바. Jigsaw 협동학습 모형 = 18
    • 사. Jigsaw 모형을 기반으로 한 이유 = 21
    • 아. 협동학습 선행연구 = 23
    • 2. 자기조절학습 전략 = 24
    • 가. 자기조절학습의 개념 = 26
    • 나. 자기조절학습의 구성요인 = 27
    • 다. 자기조절학습의 발달 = 34
    • 라. 자기효능감에 관한 연구 = 36
    • 3. 인지양식 = 37
    • 가. 장독립적-장의존적 인지양식의 일반적 성향 = 38
    • 나. 선행연구 = 42
    • Ⅲ. 연구모형 및 가설 = 46
    • 1. 연구모형 = 46
    • 2. 연구가설 = 48
    • Ⅳ. 연구방법 = 50
    • 1. 연구의 대상 = 50
    • 가. 연구의 대상 = 50
    • 나. 연구의 설계 = 51
    • 다. 표집과 동질성 = 51
    • 2. 연구 절차 = 54
    • 가. 연구 준비 단계 = 54
    • 나. 연구 실시 단계 = 54
    • 다. 연구 결과 정리 단계 = 59
    • 3. 검사 도구 = 60
    • 가. 학습동기 검사도구 = 60
    • 나. 자기효능감 검사 도구 = 63
    • 다. 학업성취도 검사 도구 = 65
    • 라. 인지양식 검사 도구 = 67
    • 4. 통계 자료 분석 = 68
    • Ⅴ. 결과 및 논의 = 69
    • 1 연구 결과 = 69
    • 가. 학습동기 = 69
    • 나. 자기효능감 = 74
    • 다. 학업성취도 = 78
    • 2. 논의 = 82
    • Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 = 87
    • 1. 결론 및 시사점 = 87
    • 2. 제언 = 88
    • 참고문헌 = 91
    • 부록 = 105
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼