RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    학교폭력 가해행동에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구 = (A)study of factors influencing school violence behavior

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10998381

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      경산: 대구대학교, 2007

    • 학위논문사항
    • 발행연도

      2007

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • KDC

      334.3 판사항(4)

    • DDC

      362.7 판사항(21)

    • 발행국(도시)

      경상북도

    • 형태사항

      vi, 120 p.; 26 cm

    • 일반주기명

      권말부록으로 "청소년의 학교생활에 대한 연구" 수록
      참고문헌: p. 91-105

    • 소장기관
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 대구대학교 학술정보원 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the level of school violence behavior, to examine factors influencing school violence behavior in detail, and to analyze the effectiveness of interaction between the factors. Based on the purpose, this study presented effective social welfare intervention plans on juvenile school violence behavior and basic data for preventing school violence.
    In this study total 718 high school students in Deagu were surveyed. The results of this study can be summarized as follows.
    First, juvenile school violence behavior showed high incidence rate and school violence behavior by general characteristics of the subjects revealed significant difference in the variables of gender, father's academic career, and school record. Especially, the fact that many students have experienced violence behavior in the schools means that the schools are not the places contributing to students' socialization and self-actualization but the places learning school violence behavior. Thus it is suggested that various intervention programs are very necessary in the level of school system because the schools are no more safe places.
    Second, the factors affecting school violence behavior and the related factors following types of school violence behavior were confirmed in this study. Especially, system factors highly affecting school violence behavior appeared in the order of school system factor, individual system factor, community system factor, and family system factor. From the level of subordinate factors, it appeared in the order of the degree of friends' delinquency, aggression, the experience of violence in the home, the attitude on violence use, the contact with mass media related to violence, and the teacher's attitude on violence. Also, the factor most highly affecting physical violence and blackmail was the experience of violence in the home, and the factor most highly affecting psychological and verbal abuse was the degree of friends' delinquency. Therefore, in order to resolve school violence behavior problems, it is necessary to formulate multi-dimensional intervention programs from the viewpoint of ecosystem such as individual, family, school, and community system.
    Third, interactional characteristics among factors adding an weight on school violence behavior and by the type of the violence behavior were confirmed in this study. That is, school violence behavior was caused more by such interactions as individual system × family system, individual system × community system, individual system × school system, individual system × community system, family system × school system, family system × community system, and school system × community system. Also, the factors alone related to school violence behavior affected school violence behavior. However, the interaction between factors caused much more physical abuse, psychological abuse, verbal abuse, bullying, and blackmail. Accordingly, it is necessary to formulated complex access programs to resolve school violence behavior. School violence behavior which an weight is added by interactional characteristics of factors will be reduced by intervention into the factor to be more easily intervened. Hence, the individual, family, school, and community systems must be closely connected to cope with school violence behavior. Moreover, it is necessary to make full use of the school social worker in school system. Then more professional service can be provided to resolve school violence problems.
    Overall with the above results, it is explored in this study that the effectiveness of interaction between individual/family system and environment system strengthens or weakens the school violence behavior although the school violence behavior stems from the individual or family factor. Thus, the intervention plan on school violence behavior should not simply focus on individual and family system. Also, the cooperative administration system in the government must be firmly built in order to cope with the school violence behavior. Furthermore, it is necessary to develop intervention programs on school violence behavior from the macroscopic viewpoint by introducing school social welfare system.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the level of school violence behavior, to examine factors influencing school violence behavior in detail, and to analyze the effectiveness of interaction between the factors. Based on the purpose, this stud...

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the level of school violence behavior, to examine factors influencing school violence behavior in detail, and to analyze the effectiveness of interaction between the factors. Based on the purpose, this study presented effective social welfare intervention plans on juvenile school violence behavior and basic data for preventing school violence.
    In this study total 718 high school students in Deagu were surveyed. The results of this study can be summarized as follows.
    First, juvenile school violence behavior showed high incidence rate and school violence behavior by general characteristics of the subjects revealed significant difference in the variables of gender, father's academic career, and school record. Especially, the fact that many students have experienced violence behavior in the schools means that the schools are not the places contributing to students' socialization and self-actualization but the places learning school violence behavior. Thus it is suggested that various intervention programs are very necessary in the level of school system because the schools are no more safe places.
    Second, the factors affecting school violence behavior and the related factors following types of school violence behavior were confirmed in this study. Especially, system factors highly affecting school violence behavior appeared in the order of school system factor, individual system factor, community system factor, and family system factor. From the level of subordinate factors, it appeared in the order of the degree of friends' delinquency, aggression, the experience of violence in the home, the attitude on violence use, the contact with mass media related to violence, and the teacher's attitude on violence. Also, the factor most highly affecting physical violence and blackmail was the experience of violence in the home, and the factor most highly affecting psychological and verbal abuse was the degree of friends' delinquency. Therefore, in order to resolve school violence behavior problems, it is necessary to formulate multi-dimensional intervention programs from the viewpoint of ecosystem such as individual, family, school, and community system.
    Third, interactional characteristics among factors adding an weight on school violence behavior and by the type of the violence behavior were confirmed in this study. That is, school violence behavior was caused more by such interactions as individual system × family system, individual system × community system, individual system × school system, individual system × community system, family system × school system, family system × community system, and school system × community system. Also, the factors alone related to school violence behavior affected school violence behavior. However, the interaction between factors caused much more physical abuse, psychological abuse, verbal abuse, bullying, and blackmail. Accordingly, it is necessary to formulated complex access programs to resolve school violence behavior. School violence behavior which an weight is added by interactional characteristics of factors will be reduced by intervention into the factor to be more easily intervened. Hence, the individual, family, school, and community systems must be closely connected to cope with school violence behavior. Moreover, it is necessary to make full use of the school social worker in school system. Then more professional service can be provided to resolve school violence problems.
    Overall with the above results, it is explored in this study that the effectiveness of interaction between individual/family system and environment system strengthens or weakens the school violence behavior although the school violence behavior stems from the individual or family factor. Thus, the intervention plan on school violence behavior should not simply focus on individual and family system. Also, the cooperative administration system in the government must be firmly built in order to cope with the school violence behavior. Furthermore, it is necessary to develop intervention programs on school violence behavior from the macroscopic viewpoint by introducing school social welfare system.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 문제의 제기 = 1
    • 2. 연구의 의의 및 목적 = 4
    • 3. 연구의 한계 = 6
    • II. 이론적 배경 = 7
    • I. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 문제의 제기 = 1
    • 2. 연구의 의의 및 목적 = 4
    • 3. 연구의 한계 = 6
    • II. 이론적 배경 = 7
    • 1. 선행연구의 동향 = 7
    • 2. 학교폭력의 특성과 유형 = 10
    • 3. 학교폭력 가해행동관련 요인 = 15
    • 4. 학교폭력 가해행동관련 요인간의 관계 = 27
    • III. 연구방법 = 30
    • 1. 연구설계 = 30
    • 2. 조사대상 = 32
    • 3. 조사도구 = 33
    • 4. 자료수집 = 38
    • 5. 자료분석방법 = 38
    • IV. 조사결과 = 39
    • 1. 조사대상자의 일반적 특성 = 39
    • 2. 학교폭력 가해행동의 특성 = 40
    • 3. 학교폭력 가해행동에 영향을 미치는 요인 = 43
    • 4. 학교폭력 가해행동에 영향을 미치는 요인간의 상호작용 = 53
    • 5. 학교폭력 가해행동의 유형에 영향을 미치는 요인간의 상호작용 = 57
    • V. 고찰 = 69
    • 1. 학교폭력 가해행동의 특성 = 69
    • 2. 학교폭력 가해행동에 영향을 미치는 요인 = 72
    • 3. 학교폭력 가해행동에 영향을 미치는 요인간의 상호작용 = 79
    • 4. 학교폭력 가해행동의 유형에 영향을 미치는 요인간의 상호작용 = 82
    • 5. 학교폭력 가해행동의 문제 해결을 위한 사회복지개입 방안 = 85
    • VI. 결론 = 89
    • 참고문헌 = 91
    • Abstract = 106
    • 부록 = 109
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼