저출산 요인과 출산장려를 위한 보육정책의 발전과제 = (A) study on the Improvement of the Government's Childcare Policies to Solve Low Birthrate and Child Birth

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In 2005, in Korea, the birth rate in total was fallen to be 1.08 person to be the lowest historically and to jeopardize national competitiveness.
The birthrate of Korea of 1.08 person was lower than the average of OECD countries of 1.6 person to produce uncertainty of the nation at large and to reflect causes of low birthrate in various ways and to make efforts to improve it and to be interested in children more than before.
Low birthrate was created because of various factors, for instance, women's participating in the society, high burden of childcare, women's burden of childcare, less reliance upon children at old age and changes of both marriage rates and marriage ages in accordance with changed values of marriage: In particular, the women thought much of economic burden of high childcare costs as well as women's burden of childcare.
To solve low birthrate fundamentally, good social conditions were urgently required to bring up children at will.
In Korea, childcare business was legally based on entity, objects, methods and financial sources of medical treatment as well as private childcare to require public childcare. To reinforce public childcare, social need for childcare and associated national support were firstly required.
These days, the government adopted childcare policies elevating public childcare levels from point of view of universalism because more women participated in the society to develop feminism.
Actually, private day care centers in the nation, for instance, private day care centers and home day care, accounted for 84.1% to accommodate 67.1% of total children who made use of day care centers and to rely on private day care.
Day care centers in the nation were mostly occupied by private day care centers: Unless such a problem was solved, public childcare could not be made.
Therefore, problems of the government's childcare policy should be supplemented by expansion of public day care centers, financial sources of childcare charges and differential childcare charges, etc and improvement of childcare quality.
The government was demanded to establish and put in practice children welfare function not to follow women policy but to guarantee childcare rights and women welfare function enough to satisfy women's participating in the society and total welfare function that performed home welfare by indirect income support of living costs by employing poor family member.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
• 1. 문제제기 = 1
• 2. 연구목적 = 2
• 3. 연구범위와 연구방법 = 3
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 4
• 1. 출산과 보육정책 = 4
• 2. 외국의 보육정책 = 8
• 3. 선행연구 = 29
• Ⅲ. 저출산의 원인 = 30
• 1. 사회적 요인 = 30
• 2.정책적 요인 = 33
• 3. 가족 및 개인적 요인 = 36
• Ⅴ. 출산장려를 위한 보육정책의 발전과제 = 44
• 1. 공공보육시설확대 = 45
• 2. 보육료 지원대상 확대 = 50
• 3. 차등보육료 확대 = 53
• 4. 보육질적 서비스 수준향상 = 57
• Ⅵ. 결론 = 64
• ※참고문헌 = 67
• ABSTRACT = 70