RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    특수교사와 일반교사의 소진,직무환경의 위험요소 및 사회적 지지와의 관계성 연구 = Burnout, Risk factors of the Job environment, and Social Support Relationships of Special Education Teachers and General Education Teachers

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10885288

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to investigate burnout, risk factors of the job environment, and social support relationships of special education teachers and general education teachers.
    The subjects in this study were 243 selected teachers who served Daegu-Gyeongbuk Area, including 114 special education teachers and 129 general education teachers.
    Tree kind of tests were used in this study; The level of burnout was assessed by the Maslach Burnout Inventory (Marslach & Jackson, 1986). It measured three aspects of burnout syndrome: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment. Occupational stress was measured by the questionnaire developed by Jayaratne and Chess(1981). It is composed of four subscales: lack of challenge, role conflict, role ambiguity, and role overload. Perceived social support from supervisors, colleagues, and family was assessed by the questionnaire developed by Caplan, Cobb, French, Harrison & Pinneau Maslach Burnout Inventory(Maslach & Jackson 1996), Interpersonal Support Evaluation List : ISEL(Cohen & Hoberman, 1983), The Way of Stress Coping Checklist(Forkman & Lazarus) (1980).
    The answered questionnaires were analyzed using SPSS program. Pearson's correlation analysis, multiple regression analysis, t-test was used for the data analysis.
    The conclusion of this study is as follows.
    First, the special education teacher's who highly perceived the risk factors of the job environment, have stronger burnout.
    Second, the special education teacher's who highly perceived social support, have the decrease of burnout.
    Third, the general education teacher's who highly perceived the risk factors of the job environment, have stronger burnout.
    Forth, the general education teacher's who highly perceived social support, have the decrease of burnout.
    Finally, There is not a significant difference between burnout of the special education teacher and burnout of the general education teacher. There is not a significant difference between risk factors of the job environment of the special education teacher and risk factors of the job environment of the general education teacher. There is a significant difference between social support of the special education teacher and social support of the general education teacher.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to investigate burnout, risk factors of the job environment, and social support relationships of special education teachers and general education teachers. The subjects in this study were 243 selected teachers who served...

    The purpose of this study was to investigate burnout, risk factors of the job environment, and social support relationships of special education teachers and general education teachers.
    The subjects in this study were 243 selected teachers who served Daegu-Gyeongbuk Area, including 114 special education teachers and 129 general education teachers.
    Tree kind of tests were used in this study; The level of burnout was assessed by the Maslach Burnout Inventory (Marslach & Jackson, 1986). It measured three aspects of burnout syndrome: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment. Occupational stress was measured by the questionnaire developed by Jayaratne and Chess(1981). It is composed of four subscales: lack of challenge, role conflict, role ambiguity, and role overload. Perceived social support from supervisors, colleagues, and family was assessed by the questionnaire developed by Caplan, Cobb, French, Harrison & Pinneau Maslach Burnout Inventory(Maslach & Jackson 1996), Interpersonal Support Evaluation List : ISEL(Cohen & Hoberman, 1983), The Way of Stress Coping Checklist(Forkman & Lazarus) (1980).
    The answered questionnaires were analyzed using SPSS program. Pearson's correlation analysis, multiple regression analysis, t-test was used for the data analysis.
    The conclusion of this study is as follows.
    First, the special education teacher's who highly perceived the risk factors of the job environment, have stronger burnout.
    Second, the special education teacher's who highly perceived social support, have the decrease of burnout.
    Third, the general education teacher's who highly perceived the risk factors of the job environment, have stronger burnout.
    Forth, the general education teacher's who highly perceived social support, have the decrease of burnout.
    Finally, There is not a significant difference between burnout of the special education teacher and burnout of the general education teacher. There is not a significant difference between risk factors of the job environment of the special education teacher and risk factors of the job environment of the general education teacher. There is a significant difference between social support of the special education teacher and social support of the general education teacher.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구 의의 = 1
    • 2. 연구 목적 = 5
    • 3. 용어 정의 = 5
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 7
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구 의의 = 1
    • 2. 연구 목적 = 5
    • 3. 용어 정의 = 5
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 7
    • 1. 교사의 소진 = 7
    • 2. 소진과 직무환경의 위험요소와의 관계 = 13
    • 3. 소진과 사회적 지지와의 관계 = 16
    • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 = 19
    • 1. 연구 대상 = 19
    • 2. 연구 도구 = 20
    • 3. 연구 절차 = 22
    • 4. 자료 처리 = 22
    • Ⅳ. 결과 및 논의 = 24
    • 1. 특수교사의 소진, 직무환경의 위험요소, 사회적 지지간의 관계 = 24
    • 2. 일반교사의 소진, 직무환경의 위험요소, 사회적 지지간의 관계 = 28
    • 3. 교사직종에 따른 소진, 직무환경의 위험요소, 사회적 지지의 차이 = 32
    • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 = 35
    • 1. 결론 = 35
    • 2. 제언 = 37
    • 참고문헌 = 38
    • Abstract = 43
    • 부록 교사의 소진, 직무환경의 위험요소 및 사회적지지에 관한 질문지 = 45
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼