成就目標指向性 槪念의 再分化 = Conceptual re-differentiation of the achievement goal orientation

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to explore the possibility of the conceptual re-differentiation of achievement goal orientation. New conceptualization is composed of 2×2×2 frame: 2 orientation contents of ‘mastery’ vs ‘performance’, 2 orientation attitudes of ‘approach’ vs ‘avoidance’, and 2 orientation distances of ‘distal’ vs ‘proximal’. The last one is the unique feature of this study.
The subjects were 623 second grade high school students. Two hundreds and four of them were utilized as exploratory group and the other 359 students were utilized as confirmatory group. The measure was developed according to the 2×2×2 8 factors structure. Total of 32 items were created, in which 4 items were included in each of the 8 factors. After examining the response tendency of items, internal consistency and uni-dimensionality of 8 factors, 28 items were maintained for the further analyses.
A series of confirmatory factor analysis supported the 2×2×2 factor structure. This means that the new conceptualization of achievement goal orientation was evidently confirmed. The results are discussed in terms of theoretical and practical implications. Theoretically, a motivational system of ‘controlled vs autonomous’ was suggested in comparison with the usual ‘extrinsic vs intrinsic’ system. Practically, the usefulness of orientation multiplicity was emphasized for the understanding of students, and the educational implication was highlighted in view of ‘short-term objective’ vs ‘long-term goal’.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
• A. 연구의 필요성 = 1
• B. 연구내용 = 4
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 5
• A. 성취목표지향성 개념의 태동 = 5
• B. 성취목표지향성의 2요인구조 = 12
• C. 성취목표지향성 개념의 분화 : 접근 대 회피 = 16
• 1. 수행목표지향성의 분화와 3요인구조 = 17
• 2. 숙달목표지향성의 분화와「2×2」4요인구조 = 22
• D. 성취목표지향성 개념의 재분화 가능성 : 원격 대 근접 = 35
• 1. 재분화의 개념구조 = 35
• 2. 재분화 가능성의 역사적 근원 = 37
• Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 43
• A. 연구대상 = 43
• B. 측정도구 = 44
• C. 연구절차 = 46
• D. 자료분석 = 48
• Ⅳ. 연구결과 = 50
• A. 척도의 문항선별과 준거타당화 = 50
• 1. 반응경향과 문항선별 = 50
• 2. 문항내적 일관성과 문항선별 = 50
• 3. 요인의 일차원성과 문항선별 = 52
• 4. 척도의 준거타당도 = 53
• B.「2×2」4요인구조 분화의 확인 = 55
• 1. 전체영역에서「2×2」4요인구조 확인 = 56
• 2. 원격영역에서「2×2」4요인구조 확인 = 59
• 3. 근접영역에서「2×2」4요인구조 확인 = 62
• C.「2×2」4요인구조의 재분화 가능성 탐색 = 64
• 1. 숙달접근영역에서 재분화 가능성 탐색 = 66
• 2. 숙달회피영역에서 재분화 가능성 탐색 = 67
• 3. 수행접근영역에서 재분화 가능성 탐색 = 68
• 4. 수행회피영역에서 재분화 가능성 탐색 = 69
• 5. 다차원척도법을 활용한 재분화 가능성 탐색 = 70
• D.「2×2×2」8요인구조의 타당성 확인 = 74
• 1. 연구모형 = 75
• 2. 성취목표지향성의 1요인모형과 2요인모형 간 비교 = 76
• 3.「2×2」4요인모형 간 비교 = 78
• 4.「2×2×2」연구모형과「2×4」대안모형의 비교 = 79
• Ⅴ. 논의 = 82
• Ⅵ. 결론 = 90
• 참고 문헌 = 93
• 부록 1 = 104
• 부록 2 = 108