RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    실천적 문제중심 가정과수업에서 청소년들의 비판적 사고력 수준에 따른 의사결정능력의 차이 = The differences in adolescents' decision making abilities according to the level of critical thinking in terms of practical problem-based instruction of Home Economics

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10845362

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to find out whether there was any difference in adolescents' decision making abilities according to the level of critical thinking in practical problem-based instruction of Home Economics.
    The subjects of this study ware 147 students from K girl's high school in Daegu. They were divided into two groups. The former was the experimental group, which took 'practical problem-based instruction' of Home Economics. The later was the control group, which took the typical lecture-based instruction. The both groups took the instruction of the same chapter, 'The life of consuming'. Prior to this experiment, the students had a preliminary examination and then 8 classes in Home Economics for 4 weeks.
    Factor analysis, Cronbach α, correlation, and two-way ANCOVA were performed for data analysis.
    The results of this study are as follows:
    The practical problem-based instruction of Home Economics has a significant influence on the improvement of adolescents' decision making ability. That is, the adolescents who took the practical problem-based instruction had shown more improvement in the decision making ability than those who took the typical instruction.
    First, there was no significant difference in the steps of problem identification and information search of the decision making according to teaching methods and the level of the critical thinking ability.
    Second, there was significant difference in the steps of alternatives consideration and value, imagining the consequences of action, of the decision making ability according to teaching methods That is, the adolescents who took the practical problem-based instruction had shown more improvement in the steps of alternatives consideration and value of the decision making ability than those who took the typical instruction.
    Third, there was significant difference in the step of decision making ability of evaluation according to the level of critical thinking ability. that is, the adolescents with the high level of critical thinking ability have made much more improvement than those with the low.
    And it was found that there was a significant difference in the step of decision making abilities of the evaluation according to the level of critical thinking in terms of practical problem-based instruction of Home Economics. That is, in the case
    of adolescents with the low level of critical thinking ability, those who took the practical problem-based instruction have made much more improvement than the others who took the typical instruction. On the other hand, in the case of adolescents with the high level of critical thinking ability, those who took the typical instruction improved much more than the others who took the practical problem-based instruction.
    Reflecting on the result of this research, practical problem-based instruction it is more efficient than the typical instruction in the decision-making ability improvement. So we need to make our ways towards practical-problem focus helpful in solving a practical problem happening in our life out of a theory-focusing instruction in Home Economics. And in the practical problem-based instruction, we need a strategy considering the level of critical thinking ability as adolescents' trait. Finally, the result of this study has shown that for Home Economics education to play a role as a practical discipline, we need to develop the instruction model focusing on practical problem in various fields of Home Economics education.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to find out whether there was any difference in adolescents' decision making abilities according to the level of critical thinking in practical problem-based instruction of Home Economics. The subjects of this study ware...

    The purpose of this study was to find out whether there was any difference in adolescents' decision making abilities according to the level of critical thinking in practical problem-based instruction of Home Economics.
    The subjects of this study ware 147 students from K girl's high school in Daegu. They were divided into two groups. The former was the experimental group, which took 'practical problem-based instruction' of Home Economics. The later was the control group, which took the typical lecture-based instruction. The both groups took the instruction of the same chapter, 'The life of consuming'. Prior to this experiment, the students had a preliminary examination and then 8 classes in Home Economics for 4 weeks.
    Factor analysis, Cronbach α, correlation, and two-way ANCOVA were performed for data analysis.
    The results of this study are as follows:
    The practical problem-based instruction of Home Economics has a significant influence on the improvement of adolescents' decision making ability. That is, the adolescents who took the practical problem-based instruction had shown more improvement in the decision making ability than those who took the typical instruction.
    First, there was no significant difference in the steps of problem identification and information search of the decision making according to teaching methods and the level of the critical thinking ability.
    Second, there was significant difference in the steps of alternatives consideration and value, imagining the consequences of action, of the decision making ability according to teaching methods That is, the adolescents who took the practical problem-based instruction had shown more improvement in the steps of alternatives consideration and value of the decision making ability than those who took the typical instruction.
    Third, there was significant difference in the step of decision making ability of evaluation according to the level of critical thinking ability. that is, the adolescents with the high level of critical thinking ability have made much more improvement than those with the low.
    And it was found that there was a significant difference in the step of decision making abilities of the evaluation according to the level of critical thinking in terms of practical problem-based instruction of Home Economics. That is, in the case
    of adolescents with the low level of critical thinking ability, those who took the practical problem-based instruction have made much more improvement than the others who took the typical instruction. On the other hand, in the case of adolescents with the high level of critical thinking ability, those who took the typical instruction improved much more than the others who took the practical problem-based instruction.
    Reflecting on the result of this research, practical problem-based instruction it is more efficient than the typical instruction in the decision-making ability improvement. So we need to make our ways towards practical-problem focus helpful in solving a practical problem happening in our life out of a theory-focusing instruction in Home Economics. And in the practical problem-based instruction, we need a strategy considering the level of critical thinking ability as adolescents' trait. Finally, the result of this study has shown that for Home Economics education to play a role as a practical discipline, we need to develop the instruction model focusing on practical problem in various fields of Home Economics education.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서 론 = 1
    • 1. 문제의 제기 = 1
    • 2. 연구문제 = 7
    • 3. 연구의 중요성 = 7
    • 4. 용어의 정의 = 11
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 = 1
    • 1. 문제의 제기 = 1
    • 2. 연구문제 = 7
    • 3. 연구의 중요성 = 7
    • 4. 용어의 정의 = 11
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 13
    • 1. 실천적 문제중심 수업 = 13
    • 2. 비판적 사고력 =16
    • 3. 의사결정능력 = 20
    • 4. 실천적 문제중심 수업과 의사결정능력 = 23
    • 5. 비판적 사고력과 의사결정능력 = 26
    • Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 28
    • 1. 연구대상 = 28
    • 2. 실천적 문제중심 가정과수업안 개발과정 = 28
    • 1) 실천적 문제문항 = 28
    • 2) 실천적 문제중심 수업안 = 37
    • 3. 측정도구 = 41
    • 1) 비판적 사고력 척도 = 41
    • 2) 의사결정능력 척도 = 42
    • 4. 실험설계 = 44
    • 5. 연구절차 = 45
    • 6. 자료분석 및 통계적 처리 = 45
    • Ⅳ. 결과 및 논의 = 47
    • 1. 실천적 문제중심 가정과수업 유형과 비판적 사고력 수준에 따른 규명단계의 의사결정능력 = 49
    • 2. 실천적 문제중심 가정과수업 유형과 비판적 사고력 수준에 따른 정보단계의 의사결정능력 = 51
    • 3. 실천적 문제중심 가정과수업 유형과 비판적 사고력 수준에 따른 대안단계의 의사결정능력 = 53
    • 4. 실천적 문제중심 가정과수업 유형과 비판적 사고력 수준에 따른 가치단계의 의사결정능력 = 56
    • 5. 실천적 문제중심 가정과수업 유형과 비판적 사고력 수준에 따른 평가단계의 의사결정능력 = 58
    • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 = 62
    • □ 참고문헌 = 65
    • □ 영문초록 = 72
    • □ 부록 = 74
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼