한·중·일 FTA 추진에 관한 연구 : 서비스 부문을 중심으로 = (A) Study on the Strategic Orientation of Korea-China-Japan FTA : Focused on Service Sector

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study is to analyse service industry in Korea, China and Japan(KCJ) and some tasks for free trade agreement among the three countries. Services have long operated in politically sensitive economic sectors and as such have been heavily regulated. In most countries of the world, for example, governments own and directly or indirectly control the communications infrastructure and services. Other services industries such as banking and insurance are either government owned or highly regulated in most countries. KCJ must be in a situation to strengthen their services industry. And the only viable strategy for the sustainable development of KCJ might be the opening to the world. The stronger competition associated with regional services trade, with similar cultural background, can reduce costs and prices, increase efficiency and innovation, and broaden the range of services being offered. It can also reduce the fragmentation of services markets. More productive services sector can also be the foundation for the better performance of other sectors, notably the manufacturing sector, as this increasingly relies on support and inputs from efficient and cost-effective producer services. FTA on services among KCJ might help them in strengthening their respective comparative advantage in services.
Services are widely differing economic product activities distinct from manufacturing, mining and agriculture. The term encompasses a broad range of industries that provide basic economic infrastructure (communications, transport, distribution, energy-related services, construction, water supply, sanitation and sewerage services, waste collection and disposal), financial infrastructure (banking, insurance, financial markets), business support (advertising, marketing, computer services, professional services), or needed social infrastructure (education, health and social services).
Services have long operated in politically sensitive economic sectors and as such have been heavily regulated. In most countries of the world, for example, governments own and directly or indirectly control the communications infrastructure and services. Other services industries such as banking and insurance are either government owned or highly regulated in most countries.
Of late, attention has shifted to the most dynamic segment of the service sector, producer services. Producer services, banking; finance; insurance; business services such as various professional services, research, advertising, marketing, consulting or data processing; transportation; storage; and communication services are used in the intermediate production of manufactured goods and other services. Demand for these activities results largely from the economic transactions of other industries. Producer services are thus facilitators of other businesses, both international and domestic, and thus are important for KCJ which have comparative advantages in goods trade over the rest of the world. For the past ten years, KCJ have experienced consecutive trade surplus in goods trade, while maintaining wide trade deficit in services trade. And not only the trends of KCJ towards service economies but also the comparison of comparative advantages of services sectors with advanced countries confirm that there are considerable gaps in the level of services sectors. KCJ must be in a situation to strengthen their services industry. And the only viable strategy for the sustainable development of KCJ might be the opening to the world. The stronger competition associated with regional services trade, with similar cultural background, can reduce costs and prices, increase efficiency and innovation, and broaden the range of services being offered. It can also reduce the fragmentation of services markets. More productive services sector can also be the foundation for the better performance of other sectors, notably the manufacturing sector, as this increasingly relies on support and inputs from efficient and cost-effective producer services. FTA on services among KCJ might help them in strengthening their respective comparative advantage in services.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = ⅰ
• 제1장 서론 = 1
• 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
• 1. 연구의 배경 = 1
• 2. 연구의 목적 = 2
• 제2절 연구의 방법 및 내용 = 5
• 제2장 서비스의 무역의 일반적 고찰 = 6
• 제1절 서비스의 개념 및 중요성 = 6
• 1. 서비스의 개념 = 6
• 2. 서비스의 중요성 = 7
• 제2절 서비스의 분류 및 서비스 무역 = 8
• 1. 서비스의 분류 = 8
• 2. 서비스 무역의 현황 = 12
• 제3절 서비스 무역에 관한 일반협정(GATS)의 주요 내용 = 14
• 1. 최혜국대우 = 14
• 2. 공개주의 = 15
• 3. 국내규제 = 15
• 4. 자격의 인정 = 15
• 5. 독점 서비스 공급자 = 16
• 6. 보조금 = 17
• 제3장 한·중·일 서비스 현황과 경쟁력 비교 = 18
• 제1절 한·중·일 서비스 현황 = 18
• 1. 한국의 서비스 현황 = 18
• 2. 중국의 서비스 현황 = 25
• 3. 일본의 서비스 현황 = 30
• 제2절 한·중·일 서비스 수준의 국제적 위상 = 34
• 1. 세계 서비스 산업의 동향과 한·중·일 서비스무역 = 34
• 2. 한·중·일 서비스의 상품 및 서비스 수출 경쟁력 = 35
• 제3절 한·중·일 서비스 부문의 경쟁력 비교와 양허 현황 = 37
• 1. 서비스화 경쟁력 비교 = 37
• 2. 부문별 서비스 경쟁력 비교 = 38
• 3. 한·중·일 서비스 부문의 양허 현황 = 48
• 제4절 한·중·일 서비스 부문의 FTA 주요 내용 = 50
• 1. 한국의 FTA 주요 내용 = 50
• 2. 중국의 FTA 주요 내용 = 51
• 3. 일본의 FTA 주요 내용 = 52
• 제4장 한·중·일 FAT 서비스 부문의 추진 방향 = 53
• 제1절 한·중·일 FTA 서비스부문의 장벽요인 및 쟁점 = 53
• 1. 한국 서비스시장의 무역장벽 = 53
• 2. 중국 서비스시장의 무역장벽 = 55
• 3. 일본 서비스시장의 무역장벽 = 60
• 4. 한·중·일간 민감 서비스 부문 및 쟁점 = 63
• 제2절 한·중·일 FTA 서비스 자유화의 시사점과 가능성 = 66
• 제3절 한·중·일 서비스 부문의 FTA 추진 방안 = 68
• 1. 서비스 부문의 개방 추진과 경쟁력 향상 = 68
• 2. 서비스 부문의 전향적 검토와 차별화된 협상전략 마련 = 70
• 3. 제조업과 서비스업간 선순환 구조 전략 추진 = 72
• 4. 한·중·일 3국의 신뢰 구축 및 협력 강화 방안 = 74
• 제5장 요약 및 결론 = 76
• ［참고문헌］ = 78
• ABSTRACT = 82