국어 음운현상에 관여하는 형태 보존의 원리에 대한 연구 = (A)study on principle of the form preservation which participates to phonological phenomena in Korean

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This dissertation put an objective which it examines closely the form preservation principle which participates to phonological processing of Korean. Until now the phonological rule as the technical tool only the side of generation will be used only, was not approached with the side which is a preservation. When the phonological processing occurs, it brings a change in form, but the reason which does not have a problem to delivery of meaning knows only must be explained the speaker accept phonological processing which preserves the form which use how, it is a portion must be explained. It is not only the ability which generates meaning in the speaker, there is also an ability it will be able to come true meaning. To ability latter creation ability of phonology instead of also the delivery ability of phonology is included. The creation ability of phonology is related with the realization of meaning, the delivery ability of phonology is related with the preservation of meaning. The phonological rule which speaker applies does only one for the creation of phonology it knows it is for the delivery of phonology.
It summarizes the contents which is discussed from main subject and it presents.
In 2 chapters, The principle of the form preservation which participates to a phonological processing is defined.
When speaker accepting a phonological processing, it considers a what kind of effect in this form preservation of it and it uses appropriately. There is a case of three branches It preserves an speaker form to the method. First, To block the application of phonological rule. Second, To add segment. Three, To maintain relation of substitution.
The form preservation follows in the form assembly and it is applied differently.
The form assembly is the combination of stem and end, noun and affix, base and base, base and affix in Korean. The assembly of stem and end has the depending characteristic. It is caused by each other depending characteristic and the phonological processing happens even in stem and happens even in end. In spite of, the phonological processing frequently occurs is not recognized with form damage. The depending of stem and end it made the system namely paradigm which one is consistent. If it accept a phonological processing because information of paradigm is stored, the damage of form does not happen.
The assembly of noun and affix when the independency which the integral part has it follows, noun the independent form and affix are depending form. If the noun does not combine affix, the assembly of noun and affix does not have the system which is consistent because it will can be come true in the surface. The phonological processing happens in the assembly of noun and affix and to the noun which has an independent characteristic the phonological processing is not applied.
The assembly of word and word operates a form preservation to the case which will accept a phonological processing strongly. The integral part will not be able to refer to the form which is contiguous to reconstructs a form because has an independent characteristic.
In 3 chapters, It explained the principle of the form preservation which participates to deletion.
'†' deletion after 'l' in conjugation was applied essentially, is not applied in declension. When '†' deletion is applied in declension, it is given the independency damage of noun and it cannot understand meaning of noun to obstruct the application of rule because. If '†' deletion after 'l' is applied in conjugation, it is not difficult to understand meaning of stem and meaning of end.
'†' deletion after vowel all it is applied in conjugation and declension, the method of form preservation is different. If '†' deletion is applied in conjugation, it will use information of paradigm and it will be able to reconstruct the structure of end. But, when '†' deletion is applied in declension, end cannot be guaranteed a independent syllable because noun to encounter a meaning damage and, end encounters a form damage.
'†' deletion when the first vowel of end and last vowel of stem combines, is a processing which the vowel of one delete. When the same vowel is joined, the vowel which delete is end vowel of stem. End vowel of stem '†' when the first vowel of end '아' with combining, it delete.
When end vowel of stem '†, e, y, jə' the first vowel of end with 'ə' combining, the first vowel of end delete. When final end 'a' has meaning an order or doubt, deletion is not applied in stem and end.
'ｎ' deletion is applied differently in Word initial and middle of word.
'l→n' and 'n→ø' is applied in the initial of word. Sino-Korean and English is all borrowed word, but word-initial restriction which are applied are different.
'n→ø' Is not applied in word-middle. When 'n→ø' is applied in word-middle, the phonological structure of word can be exchanged and it cannot agree with the underlying form, because it could be understood with the word which is different finally. But, 'n→ø' in word-middle is applied in Gyeongsang(慶尙道) dialect. When 'n→ø' being applied in word-middle, 'n' does not delete completely. [nasal] it is delivered with it leaves a trace in this neighborhood vowel. Delivering to [nasal] a neighborhood vowel is to reduce a word structure damage.
In 4 chapters, It explained the principle of the form preservation which participates to a phonological addition. The 'n' addition is applied before 'j' after word and before 'j' after word different. 'n' addition before 'j' after word does not demand morphological condition in Gyeongsang dialect, the application is possible. There is a case where the 'n' addition before 'j' is blocked. In '1 syllable root +1 syllable root', the coda of front syllable to 'k, p' case 'n' addition is blocked in Sino-Korean. When Sino-Korean is used with area name, 'n' the addition is blocked without relation in type of coda of preceding syllable. In 'last name+the word which it calls', 'last name+first name', 'day name', the coda of preceding syllable 'k, p' case 'n' addition is blocked.
The 'n' addition before 'i' after word morphological condition is satisfactory and the application is possible. The reason where the 'n' addition occurs is to block that the preceding word syllable coda moves toward the first sound of the after word.
Semi-vowel 'j' is applied to escape a vowel collision. Semi-vowel 'j' addition play role on maintains morpheme boundary as blocking the fact that deletion and coalescence is applied. When the vowel is joined, semi-vowel 'j' will be added or deletion will be applied or coalescence will be applied in conjugation. When the vowel is joined, deletion or coalescence does not happen and only the addition of semi-vowel 'j' is possible in declension. When the vowel is joined, like declension, deletion or coalescence does not happen and only the addition of semi-vowel 'j' is possible in morpheme.
In 5 chapters, It explained the principle of the form preservation which participates to a phonological substitution.
In the substitution of 'p' irregular stem, where 'p' to maintains a relation is segment which is substituted must be a same feature. The method which 'p' maintains relation is segment which is substituted must have [labial] and [vocalic]. [round] all has this feature. Is like that, the object which is the possibility of having a relation with 'p' is the 'u' and the 'w', [round].
In the substitution of 's' irregular stem, where 's' to maintains a relation is segment which is substituted must be a same feature. The method which 's' maintains relation is segment which is substituted must have [continuant] and [vocalic]. [?] all has this feature.
The method which 't' maintains relation is segment which is substituted must have [coronal] and [vocalic]. [l] all has this feature.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제1장 서론 = 1
• 1.1. 문제 제기 및 연구 목적 = 1
• 1.2. 연구사 검토 = 5
• 1.3. 연구 방법과 논의의 구성 = 8
• 제2장 음운현상과 형태 보존 = 11
• 2.1. 음운현상에 대한 음운규칙의 한계 = 11
• 2.1.1. 음운표지-음운규칙-형태음소 현상 : 규칙 기반 이론의 검토 = 11
• 2.1.2. 음운규칙과 형태 보존 = 25
• 2.2. 형태 보존의 원리에 대한 정의 = 28
• 2.2.1. 형태 보존의 방식 = 32
• 2.2.2. 형태 보존의 단위 = 35
• 2.2.3. 형태 보존의 범위 = 40
• 제3장 음운탈락과 형태 보존 = 47
• 3.1. '으' 탈락 = 47
• 3.1.1. '-으Ｘ～-Ｘ' 교체에서의 '-으'의 성격 = 49
• 3.1.2. '으' 탈락 규칙과 형태 보존 = 62
• 3.2. '아' 탈락 = 71
• 3.2.1. 동일모음 '아' 탈락 = 73
• 3.2.2. 동일모음 탈락과 형태 보존 = 88
• 3.3. 'ㄴ' 탈락 = 91
• 3.3.1. 두음법칙의 규칙 설정 문제 = 92
• 3.3.2. 명칭의 적합성과 논의의 대상 = 99
• 3.3.3. 어두의 'ㄹ'과 'ㄴ' = 104
• 3.3.4. 어중의 'ㄹ'과 'ㄴ' = 112
• 3.3.5. 'ㄴ' 탈락과 형태 보존 = 118
• 제4장 음운첨가와 형태 보존 = 121
• 4.1. 'ㄴ' 첨가 = 121
• 4.1.1. 기존 연구의 검토 = 122
• 4.1.2. 'ㄴ' 첨가 조건의 검토 = 124
• 4.1.3. 'ㄴ' 첨가의 음운론적 조건 = 125
• 4.1.4. 'ㄴ' 첨가의 형태론적 조건 = 168
• 4.2. 반모음 'ｊ' 첨가 = 169
• 4.2.1. 반모음 'ｊ' 첨가 = 170
• 4.2.1. 반모음 'ｊ' 첨가와 형태 보존 = 176
• 제5장 음운교체와 형태 보존 = 179
• 5.1. 문제 제기 = 179
• 5.2. 'ㅂ, ㅅ, ㄷ' 불규칙 어간의 교체와 형태 보존 = 182
• 5.1.1. 'ㅂ' 불규칙 어간의 교체 = 182
• 5.1.2. 'ㅅ' 불규칙 어간의 교체 = 192
• 5.1.3. 'ㄷ' 불규칙 어간의 교체 = 196
• 제6장 결론 = 199
• <참고문헌> = 207
• <Abstract> = 216