RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      한자 급수 시험의 현황과 문제점 = Status and problems of Chinese characters rating examination

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10229224

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      A general tendency is that the scope and application ratio of enforcement organizations in Chinese characters rating examination is on upturn due to increased private educational concern about Chinese characters education. Like this, as the entities supervising Chinese characters rating examination rise, so it is necessary to look over each executing organization's examining method and scope.
      The Chinese characters rating examination defines allocated Chinese characters by rate, which reveals some problems. First, the ratings are so subdivided, and do not present definite grounds dividing the scope of Chinese characters. And as a result of comparing and analyzing the number of allocated Chinese characters, the allocated Chinese characters by rated score are inconsistent, and those with remarkable rating differences of the allocated Chinese characters are discovered.
      To solve this problem in the range of Chinese characters by this rating, basic work such as frequency survey on routine life vocabularies should be preceded, and a social consensus on the allocated Chinese characters should be formed. In addition, students will have to consider Chinese characters in the association of the rating examination with elementary, secondary school Chinese characters educational system.
      What is pointed out as the biggest problem in analyzing the assessment items of the Chinese characters rating examination is the lack of assessment related to linguistic life. The assessment content is inclined to writing reading and meaning sounds of Chinese characters, which assesses how many Chinese characters are written in memory, and easily turns to learning by heart. Simply memorizing, and knowing the sound and meaning of each word is not useful to linguistic life. Thus, assessment of Chinese characters should enhance understanding and applying at linguistic life, and serve the Chinese coining and practical applying. And assessing Chinese should be focused on whether one knows the sound and meaning, uses it fit for speech, and interpret the meaning fit for the context. Assessing should be set in the direction of learning useful knowledge, and using this.
      To improve Chinese characters rating examination, one should resolve the problem of allocating Chinese characters by rating, break away from an excessively uniform question type, and develop various assessment items.
      번역하기

      A general tendency is that the scope and application ratio of enforcement organizations in Chinese characters rating examination is on upturn due to increased private educational concern about Chinese characters education. Like this, as the entities s...

      A general tendency is that the scope and application ratio of enforcement organizations in Chinese characters rating examination is on upturn due to increased private educational concern about Chinese characters education. Like this, as the entities supervising Chinese characters rating examination rise, so it is necessary to look over each executing organization's examining method and scope.
      The Chinese characters rating examination defines allocated Chinese characters by rate, which reveals some problems. First, the ratings are so subdivided, and do not present definite grounds dividing the scope of Chinese characters. And as a result of comparing and analyzing the number of allocated Chinese characters, the allocated Chinese characters by rated score are inconsistent, and those with remarkable rating differences of the allocated Chinese characters are discovered.
      To solve this problem in the range of Chinese characters by this rating, basic work such as frequency survey on routine life vocabularies should be preceded, and a social consensus on the allocated Chinese characters should be formed. In addition, students will have to consider Chinese characters in the association of the rating examination with elementary, secondary school Chinese characters educational system.
      What is pointed out as the biggest problem in analyzing the assessment items of the Chinese characters rating examination is the lack of assessment related to linguistic life. The assessment content is inclined to writing reading and meaning sounds of Chinese characters, which assesses how many Chinese characters are written in memory, and easily turns to learning by heart. Simply memorizing, and knowing the sound and meaning of each word is not useful to linguistic life. Thus, assessment of Chinese characters should enhance understanding and applying at linguistic life, and serve the Chinese coining and practical applying. And assessing Chinese should be focused on whether one knows the sound and meaning, uses it fit for speech, and interpret the meaning fit for the context. Assessing should be set in the direction of learning useful knowledge, and using this.
      To improve Chinese characters rating examination, one should resolve the problem of allocating Chinese characters by rating, break away from an excessively uniform question type, and develop various assessment items.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차
      • Ⅰ. 序論 = 1
      • Ⅱ. 한자 급수 시험의 현황 = 3
      • 1. 한자 급수 시험의 시행 = 3
      • 2. 한자 급수 시험 시행 단체 = 6
      • 목차
      • Ⅰ. 序論 = 1
      • Ⅱ. 한자 급수 시험의 현황 = 3
      • 1. 한자 급수 시험의 시행 = 3
      • 2. 한자 급수 시험 시행 단체 = 6
      • Ⅲ. 한자 급수 시험 한자 배정표 비교 = 9
      • 1. 시행 단체의 급수제 = 9
      • 2. 급수 배정 한자의 근거 = 12
      • 3. 급수 배정 한자 비교 = 17
      • Ⅳ. 한자 급수 시험의 문제점 = 28
      • 1. 평가 방법의 특징 = 28
      • 2. 유형별 평가 문항 분석 = 42
      • Ⅴ. 結論 = 65
      • 參考文獻 = 67
      • ABSTRACT = 70
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼