RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      초등학교 교사의 특수아동에 대한 인식 = A Study on the Cognition of Special Children by the Elementary School Teacher

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10111451

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        경산 : 대구대학교 특수교육대학원, 2005

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(석사) -- 대구대학교 특수교육대학원 , 특수교육학과 , 2005. 2

      • 발행연도

        2005

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 발행국(도시)

        경상북도

      • 형태사항

        1책 ; 26cm.

      • 소장기관
        • 대구대학교 학술정보원 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study was to compare and analyze whether there is difference in the cognitive level of teacher in charge of special children for the special children by the integrated education according to the individual variables(class in charge, sex, career in the profession of teaching, qualification of possession, career of training the special education, experience of teaching the special children). And, it is significant for this research to supply the basic data in order to contribute to the development of integrated education and realize the integrated education perfectly hereafter.
      As an object of research, this study was to execute the statistical packages for research about total 260 sheets, 164 teachers in charge of special education at the general classes of elementary schools and 96 teachers at the special classes. The research instruments were consisted of 6 inquires of individual variables and 34 inquiries with 3 subfields like 'cognition of integrated educationbehavioral cognitionschool cognition' in the questionnaire. As to the data processing, this study was to execute the statistical packages for research using SPSS(ver 11.0) for Windows in order to verify it how the teachers grasped the special children correctly.
      From the result of this research above, it may be summed up as follows.
      First, the cognition of special children by the teachers according to the classes in charge was totally positive. The teachers in charge of special classes had higher cognitive level than the teachers in charge of general classes in the cognition of integrated education, a subfield. The cognitive level of general class teachers was lower than the one of special class teachers, but it was just relatively low, and it might be positive in the cognitive level of special children.
      Second, as to the cognition of special children regarding of sex by the teachers, the men teachers had higher cognition of integrated education than the women teachers. And, the men teachers had higher behavioral cognition and school cognition than the women teachers. But, the sex did not have affect on the cognitive level of special children.
      Third, as to the cognition of special children regarding of career in the profession of teaching by the teachers, the teachers with a lot of teaching experience were higher than the teachers with small in the behavioral cognition and school cognition.
      Fourth, as to the cognition of special children regarding of qualification of possession by the teachers, the teachers who acquired two sorts of qualifications were higher than the teachers who acquired the qualifications of one sort in the behavioral cognition and school cognition.
      Fifth, as to the cognition of special children regarding of career of training the special education by the teachers, the teachers with the training career were higher than the teachers without the training career in the cognition of integrated education.
      Sixth, the teachers with the teaching experience for the special children over 3 years were higher than the teachers below 3 years in the cognition of special children regarding of career of teaching the special children by the teachers. But, there was no statistically significant difference.
      번역하기

      This study was to compare and analyze whether there is difference in the cognitive level of teacher in charge of special children for the special children by the integrated education according to the individual variables(class in charge, sex, career i...

      This study was to compare and analyze whether there is difference in the cognitive level of teacher in charge of special children for the special children by the integrated education according to the individual variables(class in charge, sex, career in the profession of teaching, qualification of possession, career of training the special education, experience of teaching the special children). And, it is significant for this research to supply the basic data in order to contribute to the development of integrated education and realize the integrated education perfectly hereafter.
      As an object of research, this study was to execute the statistical packages for research about total 260 sheets, 164 teachers in charge of special education at the general classes of elementary schools and 96 teachers at the special classes. The research instruments were consisted of 6 inquires of individual variables and 34 inquiries with 3 subfields like 'cognition of integrated educationbehavioral cognitionschool cognition' in the questionnaire. As to the data processing, this study was to execute the statistical packages for research using SPSS(ver 11.0) for Windows in order to verify it how the teachers grasped the special children correctly.
      From the result of this research above, it may be summed up as follows.
      First, the cognition of special children by the teachers according to the classes in charge was totally positive. The teachers in charge of special classes had higher cognitive level than the teachers in charge of general classes in the cognition of integrated education, a subfield. The cognitive level of general class teachers was lower than the one of special class teachers, but it was just relatively low, and it might be positive in the cognitive level of special children.
      Second, as to the cognition of special children regarding of sex by the teachers, the men teachers had higher cognition of integrated education than the women teachers. And, the men teachers had higher behavioral cognition and school cognition than the women teachers. But, the sex did not have affect on the cognitive level of special children.
      Third, as to the cognition of special children regarding of career in the profession of teaching by the teachers, the teachers with a lot of teaching experience were higher than the teachers with small in the behavioral cognition and school cognition.
      Fourth, as to the cognition of special children regarding of qualification of possession by the teachers, the teachers who acquired two sorts of qualifications were higher than the teachers who acquired the qualifications of one sort in the behavioral cognition and school cognition.
      Fifth, as to the cognition of special children regarding of career of training the special education by the teachers, the teachers with the training career were higher than the teachers without the training career in the cognition of integrated education.
      Sixth, the teachers with the teaching experience for the special children over 3 years were higher than the teachers below 3 years in the cognition of special children regarding of career of teaching the special children by the teachers. But, there was no statistically significant difference.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 의의 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 = 3
      • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 3
      • 목차
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 의의 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 = 3
      • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 3
      • 4. 용어의 정의 = 4
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 5
      • 1. 통합교육의 개념 = 5
      • 2. 통합교육의 조건과 운영 = 6
      • 3. 특수아동에 대한 교사의 인식과 태도 = 19
      • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 = 24
      • 1. 연구 대상 = 24
      • 2. 연구 도구 = 25
      • 3. 연구 절차 = 27
      • 4. 자료 처리 = 28
      • Ⅳ. 결과 및 논의 = 29
      • 1. 담당학급별 특수아동에 대한 인식 = 29
      • 2. 성별 특수아동에 대한 인식 = 31
      • 3. 교직경력별 특수아동에 대한 인식 = 32
      • 4. 소지자격증별 특수아동에 대한 인식 = 33
      • 5. 특수교육 연수경력별 특수아동에 대한 인식 = 35
      • 6. 특수아동 지도경력별 특수아동에 대한 인식 = 36
      • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 = 38
      • 1. 결론 = 38
      • 2. 제언 = 39
      • 참고문헌 = 40
      • Abstract = 47
      • 부록 설문지 = 50
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼