장애인의 주관적 삶의 질 모형 분석 = A Study on the Subjective Quality of Life of People with Disabilities

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구의 목적은 신체적(신체상태), 심리적(장애수용), 사회적(사회적 지지 및 사회참여), 사회경제적 요인(사회경제적 수준)들이 장애인의 주관적 삶의 질에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 분석하는데 있다. 특히 본 연구는 기존의 장애인 삶의 질 연구에서 간과하고 있는 장애수용 요인을 포함시키고 장애와 관련된 신체상태, 사회참여 요인을 분석함으로써 장애인 고유의 삶의 질을 설명하고자 하였다. 또한 신체상태, 사회경제적 수준과 같은 객관적 요인들과 장애수용, 사회적 지지와 같은 주관적 요인들을 포함하여 분석함으로써 장애인의 주관적 삶의 질을 포괄적으로 설명하고자 하였다. 자료는 223명의 성인장애인을 대상으로 설문조사를 통해 수집하였으며, 최종 215명의 자료를 분석하였다. 자료분석은 구조방정식모형을 활용하였으며, 이를 통해 다양한 요인들이 어떤 경로를 통해 삶의 질에 직접적, 간접적인 영향을 미치는지 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 장애수용과 사회참여 요인이 장애인의 삶의 질에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 사회적 지지는 삶의 질에 직접적인 영향을 미치지는 않았으나 장애수용과 사회참여를 매개로 삶의 질에 간접적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 신체상태는 사회참여를 매개로 삶의 질에 간접적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 사회경제적 수준은 삶의 질에 유의미한 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 연구결과를 토대로 장애인의 삶의 질을 향상시키기 위한 개입방안에 대해 제언하였다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this research was to test a structural equation model which specified the effects of physical, social, psychological, socioeconomic factors on subjective quality of life of people with disabilities. A survey research was conducted for a sample of 215 adults with disabilities. The data was analyzed using AMOS 7.0 program utilizing maximum likelihood method. The results showed that the acceptance of disability affected subjective quality of life. Also social participation affected subjective quality of life. But No direct effect has been found between socioeconomic level and subjective quality of life. Physical function gave no direct effects to subjective quality of life. Here social participation was played as an intervening factor. Social support gave no direct effects to subjective quality of life. Here acceptance of disability and social participation were played as intervening factors. On the basis of these results, this paper provide both discussions and suggestions for some strategies of improving the subjective quality of life of people with disabilities.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이선영, "정신장애인이 지각하는 삶의 질 요인과 수준에 관한 연구" 31 : 95-122, 2004

2 이지수, "장애인의 주관적 삶의 질 : 삶의 만족도 구조모형의 성별 비교" 한국사회복지학회 59 (59): 89-114, 2007

3 진기남, "장애인의 삶의 질 실태" 31 : 64-77, 1999

4 김봉선, "장애인의 ‘삶의 질’ 결정요인 환경적 특성과 사회적 참여를 중심으로－김봉선" 한국사회복지정책학회 (28) : 5-28, 2007

5 백영승, "자아인식검사 개발 연구보고서" 한국장애인고용촉진공단 고용개발원 2001

6 강용주, "자아인식․자아수용검사 타당화 연구" 한국장애인고용촉진공단 고용개발원 2008

7 이익섭, "시각장애인의 지역사회통합 실태와 관련 요인" 한국사회복지학회 54 : 149-176, 2003

8 박수경, "산업재해장애인의 사회통합에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구" 연세대학교 1997

9 차경호, "대학생들의 성격특성과 삶의 만족도" 9 : 7-26, 2001

10 노승현, "노화에 따른 지체장애인의 주관적 삶의 질 모형구축 연구" 숭실대학교 2007

11 김종진, "근로장애인의 빈곤결정요인에 관한 연구" 대구대학교 2007

12 엄명용, "가족(성인자녀)에 의한 노인부양의 종류와 정도에 영향을 미치는 이전(원) 가족관계 양상 분석 및 개입전략의 제시" 47 : 206-242, 2001

13 Dijkers,M, "uality of life after spinal cord injury: A meta analysis of the effects of disablement components" 35 : 829-840, 1997

14 Hayes,E.P, "The role of employment as a role model on community competence and life satisfaction" University of Illinois at Chicago 2005

15 Bishop,M.L, "The relationship of social, psychological, physical, and seizure-related variables to quality of life in adults with epilepsy. Unpublished doctoral Dissertation"

16 Leger,R.R, "The relationship among severity of illness, functional status, and health-related quality of life in youth with spina bifida" New York University 2003

17 Brakel, W. H, "The participation scale: measuring a key concept in public health" 28 (28): 193-203, 2006

18 Kling, C, "The health-related quality of life of patients suffering from the late effects of polio(post-polio)" 32 (32): 164-173, 2000

19 Brager,R.M, "The effects of chronic musculoskeletal conditions on quality of life in disabled older women" The Johns Hopkins University 2000

20 Albrecht, G. L, "The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds" 48 : 977-988, 1999

21 Diener, E, "The Satisfaction with Life Scale" 49 (49): 71-75, 1985

22 Campbell, A, "The Quality of American Life" Russell Sage Foundation 1976

23 Diener,E, "Subjective well-being" 95 : 542-575, 1984

24 Burgess,S, "Subjective ratings of quality of life in adolescents with high functioning autism and Asperger syndrome" Case Western Reserve University 2007

25 Fuhrer M. J, "Relationship of life satisfaction to impairment, disability and handicap among persons with spinal cord injury living in the community" 73 : 552-557, 1992

26 Beedie, A., "Quality of social support predicts hopelessness and depression post spinal cord injury" 9 (9): 227-234, 2002

27 Minsock, P, "Quality of life, social support, and knowledge of disease in women with rheumtoid arthritis" 49 (49): 221-227, 2003

28 Vitterső, V., "Quality of life in individuals with physical disabilities" 67 (67): 317-322, 1998

29 Bishop, M, "Quality of life assessment in the rehabilitation counseling relationship: strategies and measures" 33 : 35-41, 2002

30 Hay,C.G, "Predictors of quality of life of elderly end-stage renal disease patients: An application of Roy's model" Georgia State University 2005

31 Elwan, A, "Poverty and disability: A survey of the literature" The World Bank 9932

32 Lund, M. L, "Perceptions of participation and predictors of perceived problems with participation in persons with spinal cord injury" 37 : 3-8, 2005

33 Cohen, S., "Measuring the functional components of social support. In:Social Support: Theory, Research and application"

34 Gutshall, K. L, "Measuring quality of life among adults with mental retardation and other developmental disabilities: An examination of construct validity" The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick 2005

35 Martin,J.G, "Massage therapy improves physical function and quality of life for persons with Parkinson's disease" ersity of South Carolina 2005

36 She, P, "Long-term poverty and disability among working-age adults"

37 Hicken, B. L, "Life Satisfaction Following Spinal Cord and Traumatic Brain Injury: A Comparative Study" 39 : 359-369, 2002

38 Veenhoven,R, "Is happiness relative?" 24 (24): 1-34, 1991

39 Diener, E, "Happiness of the very wealth" 16 : 263-274, 1985

40 Miller,S.M, "Factors that influence quality of life in individuals with developmental disabilities: adaptation of a rehabilitation model" University of Wisconsin-Madison 2005

41 Reinhardt,J.P, "Effects of positive and negative support received and provided on adaptation to chronic visual impairment" 5 (5): 76-85, 2001

42 Max-Neef,M, "Economic growth and quality of life: A threshold hypothesis" 15 : 115-118, 1995

43 Thoren-Jonsson, A. L, "Distress in everyday life in people with poliomyelitis sequelae" 33 (33): 119-127, 2001

44 Kemp, B. J, "Depression and life satisfaction in aging polio survivors versus age-matched controls: Relation to post polio syndrome, family functioning, and attitude toward disability" 78 : 187-192, 1997

45 Davis, E. E, "Demographic determinants of perceived well-being in eight European countries" 10 (10): 341-, 1982

46 Lawton, M. P, "Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living" 9 : 179-186, 1969

47 김대업, "Amos A to Z: 논문작성절차에 따른 구조방정식 모형분석" 학현사 2008

48 Horowitz, A. J, "Aging and Vision Loss: Experience, Attitude and Knowledge of Older Americans"

49 Ayrault,E.W, "Adjustment to disability" 42 (42): 84-86, 1999

50 Kaiser, S. B, "Acceptance of physical disability and attitudes toward personal appearance" 32 (32): 51-58, 1987

51 Li, L, "Acceptance of disability and its correlates" 138 (138): 13-25, 1998

52 Meadow, H. L, "A life satisfaction measure based on judgement theory" 26 : 23-59, 1992

53 한국보건사회연구원, "2005년도 장애인실태조사"