영재와 일반 남아의 자존감 비교 및 영재 남아의 자존감 유형별 신체증상 및 공격성 분석 = Comparison of Self-Esteem in the Gifted & Ordinary Boys and Analyses of Psychosomatic Symptoms and Aggression according to Self-Esteem Patterns in the Gifted

국문 초록 (Abstract)

영재 남아 132명(초등학생 23명, 중학생 109명)과 일반 남아 282명(초등학생 29명, 중학생 253명)을 대상으로 명시적 자존감과 암묵적 자존감에서의 차이를 살펴보고, 영재 남아의 자존감 유형에 따라 신체증상과 공격성에서의 차이를 분석하였다. 명시적 자존감의 경우 영재 아동이 일반 아동에 비해 전반적으로 높게 나타나, 운동 능력을 제외한 학업능력, 사회적 수용, 외모, 품행, 전반적 자기가치감에서 유의한 차이를 보였다. 암묵적 자존감에서는 영재 아동과 일반 아동 간 차이가 유의하지 않았다. 영재 남아의 두 자존감의 수준에 따라 4개의 집단으로 나누어 문제행동을 살펴본 결과, 두 자존감 수준이 일치할 때보다 불일치할 때 신체증상과 공격성이 더 높았다. 아동기부터 두 자존감이 일치하는 것이 중요함을 확인하였고 영재 아동을 위해 자존감일치를 중재할 수 있는 방안에 대한 후속연구가 필요함을 제안하였다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Explicit & implicit self-esteems were measured with 132(23 elementary & 109 middle school students) gifted & 282(29 elementary & 253 middle school students) ordinary students. Additional measures on psychosomatic symptoms & aggression were obtained with gifted students. Gifted boys reported higher ESE on most of subscales except the athletic self-esteem. However there was no difference in ISE between two groups. Self esteem types significantly predicted psychosomatic symptoms & aggression in the gifted. Especially the discrepancy between ESE & ISE was the most important predictor for both internalized & externalized behavior problems. The behavior problem ratings were higher in the self-esteem discrepant groups compared to the congruent groups. This study showed that the congruency between ESE & ISE is important from childhood and later studies need to find intervention strategies against the self-esteem discrepancy.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박민정, "청소년의 공격성에 영향을 미치는 생태학적 변인" 경북대학교 2002

2 김혜숙, "청소년기 영재가 지각한 어머니의 양육태도와 청소년기 영재의 자아존중감과의 관계" 건국대학교 2001

3 윤여홍, "영재아 판별에서 한국판 영재아 행동특성 체크리스트의 유용성에 관한 연구" 8 (8): 1-30, 1998

4 전경원, "영재교육학" 학문사 2000

5 교육인적자원부, "영재교육진흥법(개정)" 교육인적자원부 2008

6 교육인적자원부, "영재교육진흥법" 교육부 2000

7 문지혜, "암묵적 자존감에 대한 정서적 글쓰기의 효과" 경북대학교 2009

8 박승진, "성취 지향적‧관계 지향적 우울성향자의 암묵적‧명시적 자존감" 서울대학교 2008

9 강명희, "문제행동에 대한 부모,아동,교사 평가간의 관계" 연세대학교 2000

10 안도희, "대학부설 과학영재교육 프로그램 참여 경험이 과학영재의 과학문제발견력과 정의적 인지적 특성에 미치는 중 장기적 효과" 한국영재학회 19 (19): 279-302, 2009

11 정수자, "기관영재, 일반영재, 평재집단 간의 성격차이 비교분석" 4 (4): 12-24, 1997

12 Roedell, W. C, "Vulnerabilities highly gifted children" 6 : 127-130, 1984

13 Spalding, L. R, "Unconscious unease and self-handicapping: Behavioralconsequences of individual differences in implicit and explicit self-esteem" 10 : 535-539, 1999

14 Kernis, M. H, "Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem" 14 : 1-26, 2003

15 Bushman, B. J, "Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, anddirect and displaced aggression: Dose self-love or self-hate led to violence" 75 : 219-229, 1998

16 McCoach, D. B, "The structure and function of academic self-concept ingifted and general education students" 25 (25): 61-67, 2003

17 Robinson, N, "The social world of gifted children & youth. In Handbook of Giftedness in Children" Springer 33-52, 2008

18 Terman, L. M, "The gifted child grows up: Twenty five years' follow-upa superior group. Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 4" Stanford UniversityPress 1947

19 Buss,A.H., "The aggression questionnaire" 62 : 452-460, 1992

20 Kernis, M. H, "Stability and level of self-esteemas predictors of anger arousal and hostility" 56 : 1013-1023, 1989

21 Rosenberg, M, "Society and adolescent self-images. Princeton" Princeton UniversityPress 1965

22 Dodge, K. A, "Social-information processing factors in reactive andproactive aggression in children's peer groups" 53 : 1146-1158, 1987

23 Altman, R, "Social-emotional development of gifted children and adolescents: A researchmodel" 6 (6): 65-68, 1983

24 Kernis, M. H, "Self-perceptions of reactions to doing well or poorly: The roles of stability and level ofself-esteem" 22 : 845-854, 1997

25 Ablard,K.E, "Self-perceptions and needs as a function of type of academic ability andgender" 20 (20): 110-115, 1997

26 Lea-Wood, S. S., "Self-esteem of gifted adolescent girls in Australianschools" 17 (17): 195-97, 1995

27 Blaine, B, "Self-esteem and self-serving biases in reactions to positive andnegative effects: An integrative review. In Self-esteem: Thepuzzle of low self-regard" Erlbaum 55-85, 1993

28 Bosson, J. K, "Self-enhancementtendencies among people with high explicit self-esteem: The moderating role of implicitself-esteem" 2 : 169-187, 2003

29 Kaplan,H.B, "Self-attitudes and deviant behavior: new directions for theory andresearch" 14 (14): 185-211, 1982

30 Jordan. G. H., "Secureand defensive self esteem" 85 : 969-978, 2003

31 Hart, C. H, "Russian parenting styles and family processes: Linkageswith subtypes of victimization and aggression. In Family and peers: Linking two social worlds" Praeger 2000

32 Baumeister, R. F, "Relation of threatened egotism to violenceand aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem" 103 : 5-33, 1996

33 Rigby, K, "Peer victimization at school" 19 (19): 3-10, 1994

34 Webb, J. T, "Nurturing social-emotional development of gifted children. In International Handbook for Research onGiftedness and Talent" Pergamon Press 525-538, 1993

35 Nuttin, M. J, "Narcissism beyond Gestalt and awareness: The name letter effect" 15 : 353-361, 1985

36 Terman, L. M, "Mental and physical traits of gifted children. Genetic studies of genius,Vol. 1" Stanford University Press 1925

37 Harter, S, "Manual for the self-perception profile for children" University of Denver 1985

38 Chan,D, "Learning styles of gifted and nongifted secondary students in Hong Kong" 45 (45): 35-44, 2001

39 오경자, "K-CBCL.아동청소년 행동평가척도" 앙적성연구소 1997

40 Epstein, S, "Is the self motivation to do more than enhance and/orverify itself? In Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem" Plenum 9-29, 1995

41 Greenwald, A. G., "Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, andstereotypes" 102 : 4-27, 1995

42 Kitayama, S, "Implicit self-esteem in Japan: Name letters and birthdaynumbers" 23 : 736-742, 1997

43 Frank, E, "Implicit but not explicit self-esteem predictsfuture depressive symptomatology" 45 : 2448-2455, 2007

44 Pelham, D. L., "Implicit and explicit personal and social identity: Towarda more complete understanding of social self. In Thepsychology of the social self" Erlbaum 115-143, 1999

45 Schröder-Abë, M, "High implicit self-esteem is notnecessarily advantageous: Discrepancies between explicit and implicit self esteem andtheir relationship with anger expression and psychological health" 21 : 319-339, 2007

46 Whitemore, J. R, "Giftedness, conflict and underachievement" Allan & Bacom 1980

47 Cornell,D.G, "Gifted children: the impact of positive labelling on the family system" 53 : 322-335, 1983

48 Khoury, T. J, "Gifted children: Current trends and issues" 6 : 49-55, 1977

49 Ehrlich, V. Z, "Gifted children: A guide for parents and teachers" Prentice-Hall 1982

50 Salmivali, C, "Feeling good about oneself, being bad to others? Remarks on self-esteem,hostility, and aggressive behavior" 6 : 375-393, 2001

51 Zajonc, R. B, "Feeling and thinking: Preference need no interferences" 35 : 171-175, 1980

52 Knepper, W, "Emotional and social problem solvingthinking in gifted and average elementary school children" 142 : 25-30, 1983

53 Zeigler-Hill, V, "Discrepancies between implicit and explicit self-esteem: Implications fornarcissism and self-esteem instability" 74 : 119-143, 2006

54 Harter, S, "Developmental perspectives on self-esteem. In Handbookof child psychology" John Wiley & Sons 275-385, 1982

55 Ludwig, G., "Behavior problems of gifted and nongifted elementaryschool girls and boys" 28 (28): 37-40, 1984

56 Dauber, S. L, "Aspects of personality and peer relations of extremelytalented adolescents" 34 : 10-15, 1990

57 Lahey, B. B, "Age andgender differences in oppositional behavior and conduct problem: A cross-sectionalhousehold study of middle childhood and adolescent" 109 : 488-503, 2000

58 Kelly, K. R, "Academic and social self-concepts of gifted, general, andspecial students" 50 : 551-554, 1984

59 Forsyth, P, "A study of self-concept, anxiety, and security of children in gifted: Frenchimmersion, and regular classes" 21 : 153-156, 1987

60 Hetts, J. J, "A case of non-conscious aspects of the self-concept. In Cognitive social psychology: The princeton symposium on thelegacy and future of social cognition" Erlbaum 105-123, 2001