RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    소규모 지식기업의 창업 성공요인에 대한 탐색적 연구 = An Exploratory Study on the Success Factors of Small Knowledge-based Firms

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103795587

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In recent years, the small knowledge-based firms have been increasingly established under favor of the creative ideas, practical experiences and professional knowledge of the entrepreneurs. There are not enough researches related to the small knowledge-based firms. This case study investigates what the critical success factors of the small knowledge-based firms are and how the factors impact the performances of the firms.
    In order to research the questions, the case study methodology of Yin was used. It is regarded relatively more rigorous case study method than others. The conceptual research model was set up to improve the efficiency and reliability of the research work. This research model shows selected independent factors which would be investigated through the research work. The factors are categorized into four groups; the characteristics of entrepreneur, the competences of entrepreneur, the competitiveness of business model, and the factors of organization. There are two factors in the characteristics of entrepreneur; the personal characteristic of entrepreneur and the vision and goal of entrepreneur. There are two factors in the competence of entrepreneur; the experiential capability and the business management capability of entrepreneur. There are three factors in the competitiveness of business model: the marketability, the profitability, and the differential competitiveness of the business model. There are three factors in the factors of organization: the amount of initial capital, the levels of preparation, and the organizational culture. Three outcome factors were selected: the growth of total sales, the rate of profitability, and the increasing of employee number.
    At first, the structured questionnaire was used to collect preliminary data and then interviews with the entrepreneurs of the three case study firms were executed based on the collected data from the questionnaires. The questionnaire was designed in the form of five Likert-type scale and to gather the descriptive comments in addition. The interviews were done on average two or three hours every visit and two or three times for each case firm. And additional data was collected through several calls.
    Three case firms were selected by the recommendation of the Korea SOHO and small business association. The number of case study firms was controlled into three in order to execute the in-depth study. Two of them are business service firms and the rest one is education service firm. Rehoboth was established in 1998 and capitalized at 35 million Won. The sales average of the recent three years is about 2 billion Won and the average profit ration is 7%. The number of employee increased from 3 to 21. Creven Academy, Inc. was established in 2003 and capitalized at 27.5 million Won. The sales average of the recent three years is about 250 million Won and the average profit ration is 6%. The number of employee increased from 1 to 7. BrightUnion, Inc. was established in 1999 and capitalized at 30 million Won. The sales average of the recent three years is about 5 billion Won and the average profit ration is 13%. The number of employee increased from 3 to 85.
    The case study analysis was executed by two approaches; the first approach is single-case analysis and the second one is cross-cases analysis. In the single-case analysis, each case firm was investigated and described by the framework of the conceptual research model. In the cross-cases analysis, all of the three case firms were analyzed by comparing the status of the factors of the conceptual research model and by exploring some implicating patterns from the comparison.
    The implications of the research are as follows. There are a couple of different findings from the preliminary studies about the characteristics of entrepreneur. The personal characteristics of entrepreneurs, desire for achievement and risk-taking propensity are not high enough and different in the cases, on the other hand their visionary ...
    번역하기

    In recent years, the small knowledge-based firms have been increasingly established under favor of the creative ideas, practical experiences and professional knowledge of the entrepreneurs. There are not enough researches related to the small knowledg...

    In recent years, the small knowledge-based firms have been increasingly established under favor of the creative ideas, practical experiences and professional knowledge of the entrepreneurs. There are not enough researches related to the small knowledge-based firms. This case study investigates what the critical success factors of the small knowledge-based firms are and how the factors impact the performances of the firms.
    In order to research the questions, the case study methodology of Yin was used. It is regarded relatively more rigorous case study method than others. The conceptual research model was set up to improve the efficiency and reliability of the research work. This research model shows selected independent factors which would be investigated through the research work. The factors are categorized into four groups; the characteristics of entrepreneur, the competences of entrepreneur, the competitiveness of business model, and the factors of organization. There are two factors in the characteristics of entrepreneur; the personal characteristic of entrepreneur and the vision and goal of entrepreneur. There are two factors in the competence of entrepreneur; the experiential capability and the business management capability of entrepreneur. There are three factors in the competitiveness of business model: the marketability, the profitability, and the differential competitiveness of the business model. There are three factors in the factors of organization: the amount of initial capital, the levels of preparation, and the organizational culture. Three outcome factors were selected: the growth of total sales, the rate of profitability, and the increasing of employee number.
    At first, the structured questionnaire was used to collect preliminary data and then interviews with the entrepreneurs of the three case study firms were executed based on the collected data from the questionnaires. The questionnaire was designed in the form of five Likert-type scale and to gather the descriptive comments in addition. The interviews were done on average two or three hours every visit and two or three times for each case firm. And additional data was collected through several calls.
    Three case firms were selected by the recommendation of the Korea SOHO and small business association. The number of case study firms was controlled into three in order to execute the in-depth study. Two of them are business service firms and the rest one is education service firm. Rehoboth was established in 1998 and capitalized at 35 million Won. The sales average of the recent three years is about 2 billion Won and the average profit ration is 7%. The number of employee increased from 3 to 21. Creven Academy, Inc. was established in 2003 and capitalized at 27.5 million Won. The sales average of the recent three years is about 250 million Won and the average profit ration is 6%. The number of employee increased from 1 to 7. BrightUnion, Inc. was established in 1999 and capitalized at 30 million Won. The sales average of the recent three years is about 5 billion Won and the average profit ration is 13%. The number of employee increased from 3 to 85.
    The case study analysis was executed by two approaches; the first approach is single-case analysis and the second one is cross-cases analysis. In the single-case analysis, each case firm was investigated and described by the framework of the conceptual research model. In the cross-cases analysis, all of the three case firms were analyzed by comparing the status of the factors of the conceptual research model and by exploring some implicating patterns from the comparison.
    The implications of the research are as follows. There are a couple of different findings from the preliminary studies about the characteristics of entrepreneur. The personal characteristics of entrepreneurs, desire for achievement and risk-taking propensity are not high enough and different in the cases, on the other hand their visionary ...

    더보기

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    지식정보화사회로 표현되는 21세기로 들어서면서 다양한 아이디어와 현장에서의 전문적 경험을 활용하여 지식기반형 소기업들의 창업이 지속적으로 증가하고 있다. 그러나 소규모 지식기업에 대한 학문적 연구는 아직 부족한 상태이다. 본 연구는 소규모 지식기업들의 창업 성공요인과 그 배경에 대한 탐색적 연구를 수행하였다. 3개의 성공적인 소규모 지식기업들에 대해 1차적으로 구조화된 설문지를 활용해 기초 자료를 수집하고 2차 인터뷰를 실시하였다. 사례연구 결과 기존의 연구들과 일부 상이한 내용들도 발견되었다. 창업자의 개인적 특성 중 성취 욕구와 위험감수 성향은 높은 수준은 아닌 반면 사업에 대한 비전과 목표는 매우 명확하였다. 창업자의 경험 역량과 사업 운영 역량은 모두 높은 수준이었으며 사업아이템의 시장성과 차별성은 모두 높은 수준이었지만 수익성은 사례에 따라 다양한 결과가 나타났다. 조직적 요인 중 자금확보는 영향 수준이 모두 낮은 것으로 나타났고 사전 준비 정도와 조직문화의 영향 수준은 모두 높은 것으로 나타났다.
    번역하기

    지식정보화사회로 표현되는 21세기로 들어서면서 다양한 아이디어와 현장에서의 전문적 경험을 활용하여 지식기반형 소기업들의 창업이 지속적으로 증가하고 있다. 그러나 소규모 지식기...

    지식정보화사회로 표현되는 21세기로 들어서면서 다양한 아이디어와 현장에서의 전문적 경험을 활용하여 지식기반형 소기업들의 창업이 지속적으로 증가하고 있다. 그러나 소규모 지식기업에 대한 학문적 연구는 아직 부족한 상태이다. 본 연구는 소규모 지식기업들의 창업 성공요인과 그 배경에 대한 탐색적 연구를 수행하였다. 3개의 성공적인 소규모 지식기업들에 대해 1차적으로 구조화된 설문지를 활용해 기초 자료를 수집하고 2차 인터뷰를 실시하였다. 사례연구 결과 기존의 연구들과 일부 상이한 내용들도 발견되었다. 창업자의 개인적 특성 중 성취 욕구와 위험감수 성향은 높은 수준은 아닌 반면 사업에 대한 비전과 목표는 매우 명확하였다. 창업자의 경험 역량과 사업 운영 역량은 모두 높은 수준이었으며 사업아이템의 시장성과 차별성은 모두 높은 수준이었지만 수익성은 사례에 따라 다양한 결과가 나타났다. 조직적 요인 중 자금확보는 영향 수준이 모두 낮은 것으로 나타났고 사전 준비 정도와 조직문화의 영향 수준은 모두 높은 것으로 나타났다.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이영직, "한국의 소호아이템 201가지" 청아출판사 1999

    2 목영두, "창업보육센터를 통한 창업기업의 지원방안에 관한 연구" 중앙대학교 산업창업경영대학원 2006

    3 이상석, "중소기업 창업결정요인" 한국중소기업학회 20 (20): 179-192, 1998

    4 권기환, "중소기업 사례연구: 의의, 절차, 그리고 개선방향" 한국중소기업학회 30 (30): 141-164, 2008

    5 이윤재, "우리나라의 소호사업에 대한 개념 및 경영실태 조사" 한국전문경영인학회 3 (3): 87-110, 2000

    6 이상석, "실버산업의 창업결정요인에 관한 연구" 한국중소기업학회 9 (9): 63-90, 2006

    7 김선화, "소호비지니스 활성화를 위한 지원시스템 구축방안" 중소기업연구원 2008

    8 정성한, "소상공인 창업성공요인에 대한 탐색적 연구" 한국중소기업학회 4 (4): 3-29, 2001

    9 이장우, "성공벤처기업 특성에 관한 탐색적 연구" 한국중소기업학회 21 (21): 105-133, 1999

    10 이장우, "벤처기업의 성공요인: 성공한 벤처기업가들? 관점" 한국중소기업학회 23 (23): 23-20, 2001

    1 이영직, "한국의 소호아이템 201가지" 청아출판사 1999

    2 목영두, "창업보육센터를 통한 창업기업의 지원방안에 관한 연구" 중앙대학교 산업창업경영대학원 2006

    3 이상석, "중소기업 창업결정요인" 한국중소기업학회 20 (20): 179-192, 1998

    4 권기환, "중소기업 사례연구: 의의, 절차, 그리고 개선방향" 한국중소기업학회 30 (30): 141-164, 2008

    5 이윤재, "우리나라의 소호사업에 대한 개념 및 경영실태 조사" 한국전문경영인학회 3 (3): 87-110, 2000

    6 이상석, "실버산업의 창업결정요인에 관한 연구" 한국중소기업학회 9 (9): 63-90, 2006

    7 김선화, "소호비지니스 활성화를 위한 지원시스템 구축방안" 중소기업연구원 2008

    8 정성한, "소상공인 창업성공요인에 대한 탐색적 연구" 한국중소기업학회 4 (4): 3-29, 2001

    9 이장우, "성공벤처기업 특성에 관한 탐색적 연구" 한국중소기업학회 21 (21): 105-133, 1999

    10 이장우, "벤처기업의 성공요인: 성공한 벤처기업가들? 관점" 한국중소기업학회 23 (23): 23-20, 2001

    11 정승화, "벤처기업 성장과 핵심경영 과제 변화에 대한 탐색적 연구" 한국중소기업학회 1 (1): 5-34, 1998

    12 이장우, "벤처기업 성공요인에 관한 이론적 고찰" 한국중소기업학회 1 (1): 69-95, 1998

    13 원종하, "벤처기업 네트워킹 활동이 경영성과에 미치는 영향" 한국중소기업학회 4 (4): 35-62, 2001

    14 빈봉식, "小商工人 創業의 成功要因에 관한 實證的 硏究" 한국중소기업학회 24 (24): 6-158, 2002

    15 "http://www.sohokorea.org"

    16 "http://www.soho.org"

    17 "http://www.smba.go.kr"

    18 "http://www.sba.gov/advo"

    19 Bruno, A, "Why Firms Fail" 30 (30): 50-58, 1987

    20 Walker, E, "What Success Factors Are Important to Small Business Owners" 22 (22): 577-594, 2004

    21 Reuber, R, "Understanding the Consequences of Founders’ Experience" 37 (37): 30-45, 1999

    22 Weinzimmer, L. G, "Top Management Team Correlates of Organizational Growth in a Small Business Context: A Comparative Study" 35 (35): 1-9, 1997

    23 Kennedy, C. R, "Thinking of Opening Your Own Business? Be Prepared!" 28 (28): 38-42, 1985

    24 West III, G. P, "The Impact of Knowledge Resources on New Venture Performance" 47 (47): 1-22, 2009

    25 Chandler, G. N, "The Founde’s Self-assessed Competence and Venture Performance" 7 (7): 223-236, 1992

    26 Sexton, D. L, "The Entrepreneur: A Capable Executive and More" 1 : 129-140, 1983

    27 Simpson, M, "Small Business Success Factors: the Role of Education and Training" 46 (46): 481-491, 2004

    28 Begley, T. M, "Psychological Characteristics Associated with Performance in Entrepreneurial Firms and Smaller Businesss" 2 : 79-93, 1987

    29 Smilor, R. W, "Managing the Incubator System: Critical Success Factors to Accelerate New Company Development" 34 : 146-155, 1987

    30 Cooper, A. C, "Initial Human and Financial Capital as Predictors of New Venture Performance" 9 (9): 371-395, 1994

    31 Sandberg, W. R, "Improving New Venture Performance: The Role Strategy, Industry Structure, and the Entrepreneur" 2 (2): 5-28, 1987

    32 Wang, C. K, "Determinants of Venture Performance in Singapore" 42 (42): 347-363, 2004

    33 Beam, H. H, "Could You Succeed In Small Business?" 32 (32): 65-69, 1989

    34 Tjosvold, D, "Cooperative and Competitive Networking by Entrepreneurs: A Critical Incident Study" 31 (31): 11-21, 1993

    35 Cooper, A. C, "Challenges in Predicting New Firm Performance" 8 (8): 241-253, 1993

    36 Yin, R. K, "Case Study Research: Design and Methods" SAGE Publications 1994

    37 Kuratko, D. F, "A Tribute to 50 Years of Excellence in Entrepreneurship and Small Business" 44 (44): 483-492, 2006

    38 Duchesneau, D. A, "A Profile of New Venture Success and Failure in an Emerging Industry" 5 (5): 297-312, 1990

    39 Lussier, R. N, "A Nonfinancial Business Success versus Failure Prediction Model" 33 : 8-20, 1995

    40 Lussier, R. N, "A Crossnational Prediction Model for Business Success" 39 (39): 228-239, 2001

    41 Gartner, W. B, "A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon of New Venture Creation" 10 (10): 696-706, 1985

    42 Lee, S. S, "A Comparison of Determinants for Business Start- up in the U.S. and Korea" 39 (39): 193-200, 2001

    43 김원준, "1인 지식서비스기업 국내외 동향" 중소기업청 2008

    44 오세헌, "1인 지식기업 육성정책" 중소기업청 2008

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-03-13 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korean Corporation Management Association KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.56 1.56 1.63
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.75 1.7 2.494 0.42
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼