RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      훈련에 대한 개인수준에서의 반응평가 모델 개발

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76446943

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Kirkpatrick(1959/1960, 1994) proposed 4 levels to evaluate training programs. These fore models are the reaction level, learning level, behavior level, and result level. However, this model has some limitations relating to the level of analysis and the measurement method in the behavior and the result level. In order to overcome the limitations, we reinterpreted the Kirkpatrick's 4 levels model and developed the measurements for evaluating training program based on Kirkpatrick's 4 levels model except the reaction level, that was used by Warr, Allan, & Birdi(1999)'s measurements. The measurements consisted of a reaction(emotional reaction, perceived usefulness, and perceived difficulty), a learning(recognized in an objective point of view). a transfer(transfer motivation, possibility of transfer), and a result(expectation of the result). This study investigated two samples in order to secure the reliability and validity of the measurements. While each sample's situation was different, both showed significant and similar results. Moreover, before beginning the training program in the second sample, we measured self-efficacy, locus of control, and openness to experience to ensure convergence validity. This also showed significant results.
      번역하기

      Kirkpatrick(1959/1960, 1994) proposed 4 levels to evaluate training programs. These fore models are the reaction level, learning level, behavior level, and result level. However, this model has some limitations relating to the level of analysis and th...

      Kirkpatrick(1959/1960, 1994) proposed 4 levels to evaluate training programs. These fore models are the reaction level, learning level, behavior level, and result level. However, this model has some limitations relating to the level of analysis and the measurement method in the behavior and the result level. In order to overcome the limitations, we reinterpreted the Kirkpatrick's 4 levels model and developed the measurements for evaluating training program based on Kirkpatrick's 4 levels model except the reaction level, that was used by Warr, Allan, & Birdi(1999)'s measurements. The measurements consisted of a reaction(emotional reaction, perceived usefulness, and perceived difficulty), a learning(recognized in an objective point of view). a transfer(transfer motivation, possibility of transfer), and a result(expectation of the result). This study investigated two samples in order to secure the reliability and validity of the measurements. While each sample's situation was different, both showed significant and similar results. Moreover, before beginning the training program in the second sample, we measured self-efficacy, locus of control, and openness to experience to ensure convergence validity. This also showed significant results.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이성훔, "학습자 만족도 확인을 위한 교육·훈련프로그램 반응평가" 교육과학사 2005

      2 윤유경, "주관적 연령의 예측요인과 심리적 특성에 관한 연구" 이화여자대학교 1996

      3 이도형, "조직 내 교육 훈련의 학습 및 전이 효과" 성균관대학교 1995

      4 구재선, "성격, 효능감, 생활경험과 주관적 행복의 관계: 토착심리학적 접근" 중앙대학교 2005

      5 박원우, "레벨이슈(Level Issue)의 의미, 현상 및 해결방안" 한국인사·조직학회 11 (11): 199-233, 2003

      6 Vroom, V.H., "Work and motivation" Wiley 1964

      7 Stolovitch, H. D., "Use of case study method to increase near and far transfer of learning" 10 (10): 64-82, 1997

      8 Baldwin, T. T., "Transfer of training: A review and direction for future research" 41 (41): 63-105, 1988

      9 Goldstein, I.L., "Training in organizations: Need assessment, development, and evaluation" Wadsworth Thomson Learning 2002

      10 Tannenbaum, S. I., "Training and development in work organizations" 43 (43): 399-441, 1992

      1 이성훔, "학습자 만족도 확인을 위한 교육·훈련프로그램 반응평가" 교육과학사 2005

      2 윤유경, "주관적 연령의 예측요인과 심리적 특성에 관한 연구" 이화여자대학교 1996

      3 이도형, "조직 내 교육 훈련의 학습 및 전이 효과" 성균관대학교 1995

      4 구재선, "성격, 효능감, 생활경험과 주관적 행복의 관계: 토착심리학적 접근" 중앙대학교 2005

      5 박원우, "레벨이슈(Level Issue)의 의미, 현상 및 해결방안" 한국인사·조직학회 11 (11): 199-233, 2003

      6 Vroom, V.H., "Work and motivation" Wiley 1964

      7 Stolovitch, H. D., "Use of case study method to increase near and far transfer of learning" 10 (10): 64-82, 1997

      8 Baldwin, T. T., "Transfer of training: A review and direction for future research" 41 (41): 63-105, 1988

      9 Goldstein, I.L., "Training in organizations: Need assessment, development, and evaluation" Wadsworth Thomson Learning 2002

      10 Tannenbaum, S. I., "Training and development in work organizations" 43 (43): 399-441, 1992

      11 Noe, R. A., "Trainees' attitudes and attitudes: Neglected influences on training effectiveness" 11 (11): 736-749, 1986

      12 Warr, P., "Trainee characteristics and the outcomes of open learning" 48 (48): 347-375, 1995

      13 Cannon-Bowers, J. A., "Toward theoretically based principals of training effectiveness: A model and initial empirical investigation" 7 (7): 141-164, 1995

      14 Royer, J.M., "Theories of the transfer of learning" 14 : 53-69, 1979

      15 Rouiller, J. Z., "The relationship between organizational transfer climate and positive transfer of training" 4 (4): 377-390, 1993

      16 Noe, R. A., "The influence of trainee attitudes on training effectiveness: Test of a model" 39 (39): 497-523, 1986

      17 Holton, E. F. Ⅲ., "The flawed four level evaluation model" 7 (7): 5-21, 1996

      18 Barrick, M. R., "The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis" 44 (44): 1-26, 1991

      19 Costa, P.T.,Jr., "The NEO personality inventory" Psychological Assessment Resources 1985

      20 Clement, R.W., "Testing the hierarchy theory of training evaluation: An expanded role for trainee reactions" 11 : 176-184, 1982

      21 Kirkpatrick, D. L., "Techniques for evaluating training programs: Part 3-results" 14 (14): 28-32, 1960

      22 Kirkpatrick, D. L., "Techniques for evaluating training programs: Part 3-behavior" 14 (14): 13-18, 1960

      23 Kirkpatrick, D. L., "Techniques for evaluating training programs: Part 2-learning" 13 (13): 21-26, 1959

      24 Kirkpatrick, D. L., "Techniques for evaluating training programs" 13 (13): 3-9, 1959

      25 Peterson, P. L., "Students' cognitions and time on task during mathematics instruction" 21 (21): 487-515, 1984

      26 Peterson, P. L., "Student's aptitudes and their reports of cognitive processes during direct instruction" 74 (74): 535-547, 1982

      27 Bandura, A., "Social learning theory" Prentice Hall 1977

      28 Bandura, A., "Social foundations of thought and action:A social cognitive theory" Prentice Hall 1986

      29 Bandura, A., "Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency" 37 (37): 122-147, 1982

      30 Jerusalem, M., "Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes, Self-efficacy: Thought control of action" Hemisphere 195-213, 1992

      31 Phillips, J. J., "ROI: The search for best practices" 50 (50): 42-47, 1996

      32 Nunnally, J.C., "Psychometric theory" McGraw-Hill 1994

      33 Warr, P., "Predicting three level of training outcome" 72 (72): 351-375, 1999

      34 Axtell, C. M., "Predicting immediate and longer-term transfer of training" 26 (26): 201-213, 1997

      35 Digman, J.M., "Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model" 41 : 417-440, 1990

      36 Campbell, J.P., "Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology, Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology" Consulting Psychologists Press 1991

      37 Costa, P.T.Jr., "Manual for the revised NEO personality inventory(NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five factor Inventory(NEO-FFI)" Psychological Assessment Resources 1992

      38 Alliger, G. M., "Kirkpatrick's levels of training criteria : Thirty years later" 42 (42): 331-342, 1989

      39 Mathieu, J. E., "Influences of individual and situational characteristics on measures of training effectiveness" 35 (35): 828-847, 1992

      40 Phillips, J. J., "How much is the training worth?" 50 (50): 20-24, 1996

      41 Rotter, J.B., "Generalized expectancies for internal vs. external control of reinforcement" 80 : 1-609, 1966

      42 Morgan, R. B., "Examining the factor structure of participant reactions to training: A multidimensional approach" 11 (11): 301-317, 2000

      43 Kirkpatrick, D.L., "Evaluating training programs:The four levels" Berrett-Koehler 1994

      44 Tai, W., "Effects of training fraiming, general self-efficacy and training motivation on trainees' training effectiveness" 35 (35): 51-65, 2006

      45 Arthure Jr., W., "Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features" 88 (88): 234-245, 2003

      46 Laker, D. R., "Dual dimensionality of training transfer" 1 (1): 209-235, 1990

      47 Holton, E. F. Ⅲ, "Development of a generalized learning transfer system inventory" 11 (11): 333-360, 2000

      48 Tracey, J. B., "Applying trained skills on the job: The importance of the work environment" 80 (80): 239-252, 1995

      49 Kraiger, K., "Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation" 78 (78): 311-328, 1993

      50 Alliger, G. M., "A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria" 50 (50): 341-358, 1997

      51 Bates, R., "A critical analysis of evaluation practice: The Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence" 27 (27): 341-347, 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-02-26 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Association Of Personnel Administration -> Korean Academy of Organization and Management KCI등재
      2010-02-26 학술지명변경 한글명 : 인사관리연구 -> 조직과 인사관리연구
      외국어명 : The Korean Personnel Administration Journal -> Journal of Organization and Management
      KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.35 2.35 2.29
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.36 2.41 4.335 0.59
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼