1. CONTENTS<BR> (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES<BR> As competition in the real estate brokerage market is expected to intensify, this study intends to look into the criteria by which a client chooses a real estate...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76443586
2008
-
321
KCI등재
학술저널
125-142(18쪽)
4
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
1. CONTENTS<BR> (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES<BR> As competition in the real estate brokerage market is expected to intensify, this study intends to look into the criteria by which a client chooses a real estate...
1. CONTENTS<BR> (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES<BR> As competition in the real estate brokerage market is expected to intensify, this study intends to look into the criteria by which a client chooses a real estate agency and to develop a new model for agency selection, in an effort to prepare solutions for an agency to gain an advantage over other competing agencies and differentiate itself from them.<BR> (2) RESEARCH METHODS<BR> Difference analysis and One-way ANOVA through the mean and standard deviation of variables<BR> (3) RESEARCH RESULTS<BR> Clients tend to choose real estate agencies according to the reliability of representatives, location, efficient handling of requests, the establishment of service warranty, and satisfaction with their service. Clients also take into account the characteristics of representatives, the environmental characteristics of agencies, the quality of service, the relationship between representatives and employees, and the characteristics of agency management as a whole.<BR> 2. RESULTS<BR> (1) For the characteristics of representatives, clients think the most important factor is their reliability: for the environment characteristics of agencies, location was considered most critical. When it comes to the quality of service, clients value representatives" service attitudes the most. While satisfaction with the service was thought most important in the relationship between representatives and employees, clients perceive a reasonable cost as the most important element in the characteristics of agency management.<BR> (2) For the difference between the characteristics of agencies that clients choose, the biggest gap was shown in the environmental characteristics of agencies, followed by characteristics of agency management, the quality of service, relationship between representatives and employees, and the characteristics of representatives.<BR> (3) There was a significant discrepancy by gender in the quality of service whereas there is no distinct difference in the selection of agencies by education level.<BR> (4) While no different was found in clients" perception of the importance among the characteristics of representatives, those of agency location, and those of agency management, there was a significant gap between the quality of service and the relationship between representatives and employees. No distinct different was seen in the selection of agencies according to transaction types. Although there was no difference in the perception of the importance of representative characteristics, service quality, relationship between representatives and employees, and agency management, when selecting by the number of transactions, a significant discrepancy appeared in the environmental characteristics.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 안정근, "현대부동산학" 법문사 2004
2 김영수, "할인점 이용자의 점포선택에 관한 실증적 연구" 동의대학교 2003
3 정영복, "편의점 경영실태와 경쟁전략에 관한 연구" 숭실대학교 1992
4 옥선종, "유통학개론" 형설출판사 2000
5 이수동, "유통관리" 법문사 2001
6 윤훈현, "소비자행동론" 석정 2005
7 천광석, "소비자 점포선택 행동에 관한 연구" 청주대학교 2004
8 이창석, "부동산학개론" 형설출판사 2000
9 정희남, "부동산중개품질 향상방안 연구 : 중개대상물 확인ㆍ설명서 세분화방안을 중심으로" 국토연구원 2007
10 문영기, "부동산중개이론" 부연사 2005
1 안정근, "현대부동산학" 법문사 2004
2 김영수, "할인점 이용자의 점포선택에 관한 실증적 연구" 동의대학교 2003
3 정영복, "편의점 경영실태와 경쟁전략에 관한 연구" 숭실대학교 1992
4 옥선종, "유통학개론" 형설출판사 2000
5 이수동, "유통관리" 법문사 2001
6 윤훈현, "소비자행동론" 석정 2005
7 천광석, "소비자 점포선택 행동에 관한 연구" 청주대학교 2004
8 이창석, "부동산학개론" 형설출판사 2000
9 정희남, "부동산중개품질 향상방안 연구 : 중개대상물 확인ㆍ설명서 세분화방안을 중심으로" 국토연구원 2007
10 문영기, "부동산중개이론" 부연사 2005
11 서진형, "부동산중개업의 성과결정요인에 관한 연구" 대구대학교 2001
12 장우진, "부동산중개업에서의 서비스품질요인이 서비스품질성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국지적학회 10-14, 2002
13 이창석, "부동산중개업" 형설출판사 2003
14 서진형, "부동산중개론" 부연사 2006
15 장우진, "부동산업의 서비스지향성과 경영성과와의 관계- 부동산중개업을 중심으로 -" 한국부동산학회 (25) : 95-106, 2005
16 박원석, "부동산업에서 6시그마 경영의 활용" 한국부동산분석학회 9 (9): 28-32, 2003
17 서진형, "부동산경영실무" 부연사 2001
18 이기칠, "백화점 고객의 구매행동에 관한 연구" 중앙대학교 2000
19 이용우, "마케팅원론" 형설출판사 2000
20 여운각, "마케팅관리론" 법문사 1987
21 R. F. Kelly, "The Semantic Differential : An Information Source for Designing Retail patronage Appeals" 43-47, 1967
22 Pierre Martineau, "The Personality oh the Retail Store" Harvard Business Review 51-52, 1958
23 Baker,J., "The Influence of Multiple Store Environment Cues on Perceived Merchandise Value and Patronage Intention" 39-52, 2002
24 Leon G. Schiffman, "The Contribution of Store-Type choice" 3-14, 1977
25 Tang, C. S., "Store Choice and Shopping Behavior : How price Format Works" 43 (43): 56-74, 2001
26 Belk, R. W., "Situation Variables and Consumer Behavior" 2 (2): 157-164, 1975
27 Ahn,K.H., "Hierarchical Models of Store Choice" 39-52, 1989
28 Turley, L. W., "Atmospheric Effects on Shopping Behaior : a Review of the Experimental Evidence" 49 (49): 193-211, 2000
29 Hansen R. A., "An Empirical Investigation of Attribute Importance in Retail Store Selection" 53 (53): 59-72, 1977
30 Spiggle, S., "A Choice Sets Model of Retail Selection" 51 : 98-107, 1987
31 J. H. Kunkel, "A Behavioral Conception of Retail Image" Journal of Marketing 21-22, 1968
합리적 국토관리를 위한 대형 국책사업의 종합사업관리 컨수시엄 적용 필요성에 관한 연구
Real Estate Business Foundation and Management Strategies
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 평가 | 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가) | |
| 2021-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
| 2019-12-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가) | |
| 2018-12-01 | 등재 | 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2015-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 등재 | (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 등재 | (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2.61 | 2.61 | 1.87 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.49 | 1.25 | 0.704 | 0.38 |