RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      초등학교 교사들의 융합인재교육(STEAM)에 대한 인식 연구 = A Study of the Elementary School Teachers` Perception in STEAM Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Mathematics) Education

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60032826

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study was to investigate the elementary school teachers` perception in STEAM Education. STEAM is an acronym of Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics. Korean government defined “STEAM” as the convergence education for quality human resources in the fields of science and technology. For this study, 93 elementary school teachers who have taught mathematics/science in gifted class were selected and a fifteen items questionnaire designed to elicit teachers` perception of steam education was to administered to them, The major findings are as follows: First, the ratio of teachers who understood a steam education exactly is very low. But teachers have positive thoughts about the need of steam education. Second, teachers thought that steam education has a good effect on elementary education. Third, teachers thought that steam education will be an alternative teaching and learning method. Fourth, teachers have negative thoughts to participate in class work related on steam education. To improve negative attitudes on steam education, incentives for teachers seems to be required. In order to spread steam education among the elementary school teachers successfully, the expansion of school facilities, administrators and staff in mind, improving financial support, strengthening education through the development of content and teaching strategies were analyzed as a challenge
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to investigate the elementary school teachers` perception in STEAM Education. STEAM is an acronym of Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics. Korean government defined “STEAM” as the convergence educat...

      The purpose of this study was to investigate the elementary school teachers` perception in STEAM Education. STEAM is an acronym of Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics. Korean government defined “STEAM” as the convergence education for quality human resources in the fields of science and technology. For this study, 93 elementary school teachers who have taught mathematics/science in gifted class were selected and a fifteen items questionnaire designed to elicit teachers` perception of steam education was to administered to them, The major findings are as follows: First, the ratio of teachers who understood a steam education exactly is very low. But teachers have positive thoughts about the need of steam education. Second, teachers thought that steam education has a good effect on elementary education. Third, teachers thought that steam education will be an alternative teaching and learning method. Fourth, teachers have negative thoughts to participate in class work related on steam education. To improve negative attitudes on steam education, incentives for teachers seems to be required. In order to spread steam education among the elementary school teachers successfully, the expansion of school facilities, administrators and staff in mind, improving financial support, strengthening education through the development of content and teaching strategies were analyzed as a challenge

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 조재주, "화학영역의 통합적 STEM 발명교육 프로그램 모형 개발" 한국실과교육연구학회 17 (17): 165-188, 2011

      2 이미경, "학교 과학 교육에서 과학에 대한 태도에 영향을 미치는 요인 조사" 한국과학교육학회 24 (24): 946-958, 2004

      3 교육과학기술부, "창의인재와 선진과학기술로 여는 미래 대한민국" 2010

      4 한국과학기술단체총연합회, "미래융합과학기술인재 양성을 위한 STEAM 교육" 2011

      5 김진수, "기술교육의 새로운 통합교육 방법인 STEM 교육의 탐색" 한국기술교육학회 7 (7): 1-29, 2007

      6 배선아, "공업계열 전문계 고등학교 화공 분야의 STEM 교육에 대한 화공교사의 인식과 요구" 대한공업교육학회 35 (35): 44-67, 2010

      7 Yakman, G., "Using BADUK to teach purposefully integrated STEM/STEAM education" 2007

      8 Brown, R., "Understanding STEM: current perceptions" 70 (70): 5-9, 2011

      9 National Research Council, "Successful K-12 STEM Education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics" National Academy of Science 2011

      10 Maes, B., "Stop talking about “STEM” education! “TEAMS” is way cooler!"

      1 조재주, "화학영역의 통합적 STEM 발명교육 프로그램 모형 개발" 한국실과교육연구학회 17 (17): 165-188, 2011

      2 이미경, "학교 과학 교육에서 과학에 대한 태도에 영향을 미치는 요인 조사" 한국과학교육학회 24 (24): 946-958, 2004

      3 교육과학기술부, "창의인재와 선진과학기술로 여는 미래 대한민국" 2010

      4 한국과학기술단체총연합회, "미래융합과학기술인재 양성을 위한 STEAM 교육" 2011

      5 김진수, "기술교육의 새로운 통합교육 방법인 STEM 교육의 탐색" 한국기술교육학회 7 (7): 1-29, 2007

      6 배선아, "공업계열 전문계 고등학교 화공 분야의 STEM 교육에 대한 화공교사의 인식과 요구" 대한공업교육학회 35 (35): 44-67, 2010

      7 Yakman, G., "Using BADUK to teach purposefully integrated STEM/STEAM education" 2007

      8 Brown, R., "Understanding STEM: current perceptions" 70 (70): 5-9, 2011

      9 National Research Council, "Successful K-12 STEM Education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics" National Academy of Science 2011

      10 Maes, B., "Stop talking about “STEM” education! “TEAMS” is way cooler!"

      11 이동윤, "STEM교육의 필요성에 대한 기술교사의 인식과 요구" 충남대학교 2011

      12 송정범, "STEM 통합교육을 위한 교실친화적 로봇교육 모형 및 프로그램 개발에 관한 연구" 한국교원대학교 2010

      13 문대영, "STEM 통합 접근의 사전 공학교육 프로그램 모형 개발" 한국공학교육학회 11 (11): 90-101, 2008

      14 최유현, "STEM 기반 발명영재교육 프로그램 개발과 적용 효과" 한국기술교육학회 8 (8): 143-164, 2008

      15 최정훈, "STEAM 교육이 성공하려면" (2월) : 2011

      16 Reiss, M., "S-T-E-M working together for schools and colleges" The Royal Society 1-8, 2007

      17 JTE, "Passing the baton at the intersection of acronymonium and heritage roads" 21 (21): 2-9, 2009

      18 Halsey, K., "Increasing capacity in STEM education research: A study exploring the potential for a fellowship programme" NFER 2007

      19 Platz, J., "How do you turn STEM into STEAM? Add the Arts! Columbus: Ohio Alliance for Arts Education"

      20 Nordmann, A, "Converging technologies-shaping the future of European societies" European Commissin 2004

      21 Roco, M. C., "Converging Technology for Improving Human Performance" NSf/DOC 2002

      22 Porter, A. L., "A system model of innovation process in university STEM education" 95 (95): 13-24, 2006

      23 Sanders, M, "A rationale for new approaches to STEM education and STEM education graduate programs" 2009

      24 National Research Council, "A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas" National Academy of Science 2011

      25 교육과학기술부, "2009 개정 교육과정에 따른 과학과 교육과정. 교육과학기술부 고시 제2011-361호"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.21 1.21 1.35
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.34 1.28 1.783 0.5
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼