RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    영재들이 겪는 문제에 대한 사례 연구 = Case Studies on Social and Emotional Problems of the Two Gifted Elementary Students

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A5076778

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study pursues to illustrate the affective development of gifted students. Two elementary gifted students facing social and emotional struggles with peers and teachers are featured in two within case studies and a between case study. Using methods for qualitative, data collected through interviews with students, parents, and teachers and letters with teachers. The fourth grader is at risk for his asynchronous development and dual exceptionality. His immaturity in behaviors disappointed teachers and they regarded him a troubled student. Adults including his parents and teachers failed to recognize his behaviors associated with ADHD. Teachers` and peers` rejections and negative reactions resulted in the gifted student`s isolation and loneliness at school. The fifth grader`s high self-esteem caused a teacher`s misunderstanding of his behaviors and rejection to him. His strong expression of dislike caused another issue. He tried to manipulate friends to play a joke on a classmate. His teacher was disappointed and came to keep him at a distance. This case study manifested the negative effects of teachers` responses on students affective development. To support gifted students emotional needs, parents and educators should understand that gifted students who is ahead of his or her age mates in intellectual area is not always ahead emotionally and socially and that the giftedness can bring concomitant problems. Also, parents and educators should understand that the giftedness can exist with disabilities like ADHD and make every effort to provide intervention to the gifted students with this dual exceptionality.
    번역하기

    This study pursues to illustrate the affective development of gifted students. Two elementary gifted students facing social and emotional struggles with peers and teachers are featured in two within case studies and a between case study. Using methods...

    This study pursues to illustrate the affective development of gifted students. Two elementary gifted students facing social and emotional struggles with peers and teachers are featured in two within case studies and a between case study. Using methods for qualitative, data collected through interviews with students, parents, and teachers and letters with teachers. The fourth grader is at risk for his asynchronous development and dual exceptionality. His immaturity in behaviors disappointed teachers and they regarded him a troubled student. Adults including his parents and teachers failed to recognize his behaviors associated with ADHD. Teachers` and peers` rejections and negative reactions resulted in the gifted student`s isolation and loneliness at school. The fifth grader`s high self-esteem caused a teacher`s misunderstanding of his behaviors and rejection to him. His strong expression of dislike caused another issue. He tried to manipulate friends to play a joke on a classmate. His teacher was disappointed and came to keep him at a distance. This case study manifested the negative effects of teachers` responses on students affective development. To support gifted students emotional needs, parents and educators should understand that gifted students who is ahead of his or her age mates in intellectual area is not always ahead emotionally and socially and that the giftedness can bring concomitant problems. Also, parents and educators should understand that the giftedness can exist with disabilities like ADHD and make every effort to provide intervention to the gifted students with this dual exceptionality.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 서소영, "초등학교 영재아동과 일반아동의 문제행동 비교" 건국대학교 2003

    2 김홍원, "초등 영재학생의 지적ㆍ정의적 행동 특성 및 지도 방안 연구" 한국교육개발원 2003

    3 이외숙, "초등 영재아가 지각하는 부모의 성취압력 및 교사로부터 받는 스트레스의 정도와 대처행동" 창원대학교 2005

    4 한선화, "영재학생과 일반학생의 리더십 기술과 사회성숙도의 비교? 분석" 12 (12): 278-299, 2005

    5 송정남, "영재아동의 인지적 특성과 과흥분성에 관한 연구" 24 (24): 117-137, 2005

    6 고범석, "e-러닝을 통한 영재교육 성화 방안" 한국교육학술정보원 2006

    7 Delisle,J., "When Gifted Kids Don't Have All the Answers: How to Meet Their Social and Emotional Needs" Free Spirit 2002

    8 Schuler,P.A., "Voices of perfectionism: Perfectionistic gifted adolescents in a?rural middle school. (Research Monograph 99140). Storrs" University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented 1999

    9 Davidson,J.E., "The role of insight in giftedness in : Conceptions of Giftedness" Cambridge University Press 201-222, 1986

    10 Powell,P., "The intellectual and psychosocial nature of extreme giftedness" 6 (6): 131-13, 1984

    1 서소영, "초등학교 영재아동과 일반아동의 문제행동 비교" 건국대학교 2003

    2 김홍원, "초등 영재학생의 지적ㆍ정의적 행동 특성 및 지도 방안 연구" 한국교육개발원 2003

    3 이외숙, "초등 영재아가 지각하는 부모의 성취압력 및 교사로부터 받는 스트레스의 정도와 대처행동" 창원대학교 2005

    4 한선화, "영재학생과 일반학생의 리더십 기술과 사회성숙도의 비교? 분석" 12 (12): 278-299, 2005

    5 송정남, "영재아동의 인지적 특성과 과흥분성에 관한 연구" 24 (24): 117-137, 2005

    6 고범석, "e-러닝을 통한 영재교육 성화 방안" 한국교육학술정보원 2006

    7 Delisle,J., "When Gifted Kids Don't Have All the Answers: How to Meet Their Social and Emotional Needs" Free Spirit 2002

    8 Schuler,P.A., "Voices of perfectionism: Perfectionistic gifted adolescents in a?rural middle school. (Research Monograph 99140). Storrs" University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented 1999

    9 Davidson,J.E., "The role of insight in giftedness in : Conceptions of Giftedness" Cambridge University Press 201-222, 1986

    10 Powell,P., "The intellectual and psychosocial nature of extreme giftedness" 6 (6): 131-13, 1984

    11 Durr,W.K., "The gifted student" Oxford University Press 1964

    12 Schneider,B.H., "The gifted child in peer group perspective" Springer-Verlag 1987

    13 Silverman,L.K., "The construct of asynchronous development" 72 (72): 36-58, 1997

    14 Gallagher,J., "Teaching the gifted child" Allyn and Bacon 1975

    15 Moss,E., "Social interaction and metacognitive development in gifted preschoolers" 34 : 16-20, 1990

    16 Schuler,P.A., "Schuler, P. A. (2003). Gifted Kids at risk: who's listening? Retrieved from online: http://www.sengifted.org/articles_social"

    17 Patton,Q., "Qualitative research & evaluation methods(3rd Edition)" Sage 2002

    18 Miles,B., "Qualitative data analysis:An expanded sourcebook" Sage 1994

    19 Adderholt-Elliot,M., "Perfectionism and underachievement" 12 (12): 19-21, 1989

    20 Lincoln,S., "Naturalistic inquiry" Sage 1985

    21 이수진, "K-CBCL을 통한 성취 영재와 미성취 영재의 문제행동 비교" 건국대학교 2005

    22 Moss,E., "Interactive problem-solving of gifted and non-gifted pre-schoolers with their mothers" 13 : 177-197, 1991

    23 Colangelo,N., "Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed.)" Allyn and Bacon 1997

    24 Clark,B., "Growing up gifted. Columbus" Merril 1988

    25 Whitmore,J.R., "Giftedness,conflict and underachievement" Allyn & Bacon 1980

    26 Moon,S.M., "Gifted children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Social/Emotional Issues in : The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?" Prufrock Press 2002

    27 Silverman,L., "Counseling the Gifted and Talented" Love Publishing Company 2000

    28 Yin,K., "Case study research: Design and methods" Sage 1989

    29 Strauss,A., "Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques" Sage Publications 1990

    30 문태형, "Asperger Syndrome영재의 이해" 49 : 387-401, 2007

    31 맹현숙, "ADHD 증후를 지닌 2학년 영재아동의 학교생활 변화과정에 대한 사례연구" 18 (18): 243-277, 2005

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.84 1.84 1.82
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.82 1.8 2.264 0.23
    더보기
    해외이동버튼