RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    대륙별 원두의 로스팅에 따른 관능적 특성에 관한 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102008357

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study was to explore the sensory properties according to roasting conditions of coffee beans, and physicochemical and sensory evaluation was conducted by roasting degrees with Agtron roast color classification #65 and #55. Samples were two kinds of coffee beans produced by four continents to minimize error by coffee bean producer. In flavor evaluation of coffee by country of origin, it was found that in Flowers C3 had the highest flower-odor, and in Caramelly C6 and C7 were the most significantly high(p<0.05), and in Chocolaty C1 and C6 were the most significantly high(p<0.05), in Pine resin C3, C5, and C6 were the most significantly high(p<0.01), in Spicy there were no significant differences between the samples, while in Burnt there were significant differences between the samples(p<0.001), C8 was highest, and in Overall Flavor there were significant differences of flavors between the samples(p<0.001). In the results of sensory evaluation of espresso extracted from coffee by country of origin, in Sight C2 was the most significantly strong of crema consistency (p<0.001), C1 and C5 were the most significantly long of crema persistence (p<0.001), in Smell there were significant differences of aroma between the samples(p<0.001) and C3 and C8 were the strongest and C5 was the weakest, and C8 was the most significantly strong of flavor (p<0.001). In Taste there were significant differences of sour between the samples(p<0.001), C2, C3, C4, C6, and C8 were the strongest and C5 was the weakest, and there were significant differences of sweet between the samples(p<0.01), C4, C5, and C7 were the highest, and C1 and C2 were the lowest, and C1, C2, and C8 were the most significantly strong of bitter (p<0.001), and C5 was the weakest. in Aftertaste C1 and C8 were the most significantly highest (p<0.01), and C5 and C6 were the lowest. In Touch there were no significant differences of body between the samples, and C8 was the most significantly strong of astringent (p<0.001) and C5 was the lowest of astringent. In overall sensory characteristics, there were significant differences between the samples (p<0.001), and C8 was the highest, next C7, and C1, C4, and C6 were the same values, and followed by C2, C3, and C5. In the results of preference evaluation of espresso extracted from coffee by country of origin, there were significant differences of preference of crema color between the samples (p<0.001), C1 was the highest and C8 was the lowest, In preference of aroma C3 was the highest (p<0.01), and C8 was the lowest. There were significant differences of preference of flavor between the samples (p<0.05), and C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, and C6 were the same values and the highest, and C8 was the lowest. In preference of balance C5 was the most significantly high (p<0.01), and C8 was the lowest. As a result C5 was the highest of preference from taste panels.
    번역하기

    This study was to explore the sensory properties according to roasting conditions of coffee beans, and physicochemical and sensory evaluation was conducted by roasting degrees with Agtron roast color classification #65 and #55. Samples were two kinds ...

    This study was to explore the sensory properties according to roasting conditions of coffee beans, and physicochemical and sensory evaluation was conducted by roasting degrees with Agtron roast color classification #65 and #55. Samples were two kinds of coffee beans produced by four continents to minimize error by coffee bean producer. In flavor evaluation of coffee by country of origin, it was found that in Flowers C3 had the highest flower-odor, and in Caramelly C6 and C7 were the most significantly high(p<0.05), and in Chocolaty C1 and C6 were the most significantly high(p<0.05), in Pine resin C3, C5, and C6 were the most significantly high(p<0.01), in Spicy there were no significant differences between the samples, while in Burnt there were significant differences between the samples(p<0.001), C8 was highest, and in Overall Flavor there were significant differences of flavors between the samples(p<0.001). In the results of sensory evaluation of espresso extracted from coffee by country of origin, in Sight C2 was the most significantly strong of crema consistency (p<0.001), C1 and C5 were the most significantly long of crema persistence (p<0.001), in Smell there were significant differences of aroma between the samples(p<0.001) and C3 and C8 were the strongest and C5 was the weakest, and C8 was the most significantly strong of flavor (p<0.001). In Taste there were significant differences of sour between the samples(p<0.001), C2, C3, C4, C6, and C8 were the strongest and C5 was the weakest, and there were significant differences of sweet between the samples(p<0.01), C4, C5, and C7 were the highest, and C1 and C2 were the lowest, and C1, C2, and C8 were the most significantly strong of bitter (p<0.001), and C5 was the weakest. in Aftertaste C1 and C8 were the most significantly highest (p<0.01), and C5 and C6 were the lowest. In Touch there were no significant differences of body between the samples, and C8 was the most significantly strong of astringent (p<0.001) and C5 was the lowest of astringent. In overall sensory characteristics, there were significant differences between the samples (p<0.001), and C8 was the highest, next C7, and C1, C4, and C6 were the same values, and followed by C2, C3, and C5. In the results of preference evaluation of espresso extracted from coffee by country of origin, there were significant differences of preference of crema color between the samples (p<0.001), C1 was the highest and C8 was the lowest, In preference of aroma C3 was the highest (p<0.01), and C8 was the lowest. There were significant differences of preference of flavor between the samples (p<0.05), and C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, and C6 were the same values and the highest, and C8 was the lowest. In preference of balance C5 was the most significantly high (p<0.01), and C8 was the lowest. As a result C5 was the highest of preference from taste panels.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이은하, "한국인 일반인구에서 커피 및 차 섭취와 임상 혈액검사 지표와의 상관성 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2010

    2 신중원, "커피전문점의 지속가능경영이 소비자의 행동의도에 미치는 영향 및 한국인의 커피 섭취 실태" 서울대학교 대학원 2012

    3 서한석, "커피의 배전 강도에 따른 이화학적, 관능적 특성 및 항산화성 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2002

    4 서한석, "커피의 관능 및 감성평가 방법의 개발과 세분화된 소비자의 커피 선호 유형 분석" 서울대학교 대학원 2006

    5 신우리, "커피원두의 분쇄입도에 따른 에스프레소의 품질특성" 경희대학교 대학원 2011

    6 김관중, "커피원두의 배전공정중 화학적 성분 및 관능적 특성 변화에 대한 연구" 경희대학교 대학원 2001

    7 Gerhard A. Jansen, "커피로스팅" 주빈커피 2007

    8 임종희, "커피관련 무역 통계치" 117-, 2012

    9 이봄이, "커피 크리머와 커피믹스의 지방산 조성 및 관능적 특성" 서울대학교 대학원 2012

    10 "커피 원산지는 로스팅 가공국" 40-, 2012

    11 안재혁, "커피 볶아주는 남자" 살림 2009

    12 김호철, "커피" 기문사 2011

    13 김하경, "종류별 커피의 볶음 및 추출조건에 따른 품질 특성에 관한 연구" 한국식품영양학회 20 (20): 14-19, 2007

    14 전광수, "전광수의 커피로스팅" 아이비라인 2008

    15 김기영, "외식산업관리론" 현학사 2003

    16 문준웅, "완전한 에스프레소의 이해" 2008

    17 이승연, "에스프레소 희석 커피(아메리카노)의 희석 배수에 따른 관능적 특성" 한국식품조리과학회 23 (23): 839-847, 2007

    18 강대철, "압출성형커피생두의 물리화학적 특성" 공주대학교 대학원 2004

    19 최유미, "생두 가공법과 등급에 따른 커피의 관능적 품질 특성" 경희대학교 대학원 2009

    20 김지영, "배전시간을 달리한 커피의 항균효과 및 항산화성에 관한 연구" 성신여대 대학원 2009

    21 김정윤, "배전 조건에 따른 커피의 관능적 특성에 관한 연구" 경희대학교 관광대학원 2012

    22 (사)한국커피전문가협회, "바리스타가 알고 싶은 커피학" 교문사 2011

    23 ひろせゆきお, "더 알고 싶은 커피학" 광문각 2007

    24 신선영, "대학생들의 건강관련 요인이 커피와 전통음료의 기호도와 섭취빈도에 미치는 영향" 한국식생활문화학회 22 (22): 420-433, 2007

    25 文準雄, "包裝條件에 따른 貯藏중 커피의 香味 特性의 變化와 保存 期間" 경희대학교 대학원 1997

    26 Petracco M., "the cup" 290-315, 2005

    27 Rothfo. B., "coffee consumption" Gordan-Max Rieck Gmb H 99-104, 1986

    28 Maarse, H., "Volatile compounds in foods, Quantitative and qualitative data" TNO 1996

    29 Schwan RF, "Toxigenic fungi associated with processed (geen) coffee beans (Coffea arabica L.)" (85) : 293-300, 2003

    30 Cipolla M., "Today’s Espresso Bar: Common problems and relative solutions" 171 (171): 32-39, 1999

    31 Ensminger, A.H., "The concise encyclopedia of food and nutrition" CRC Press 210-214, 1995

    32 Ted. R. Lingle, "The coffee Cuppers Hand book SCAA"

    33 송주빈, "The Science of Coffee" 주빈 29-31, 2008

    34 Abreu LM, "Succession of bacterial and communities during natural coffee(coffea Arabica) fermentation" 125 : 951-957, 2008

    35 ICO, "Sensory Evlauation of Coffee" International Coffee Organization 74-, 1991

    36 SCAA, "SCAA Green Arabica Coffee Classification System"

    37 Rosa MD, "Quality characteristics of the espresso coffee in relation to the type of preparation(Italian)" 9 : 629-633, 1986

    38 Maeztu L, "Multi variate methods for characterization and classification of espresso Coffees from different botanical varieties and types of roast by foam, taste, and mouth feel" 49 (49): 4743-4474, 2001

    39 Silva CF, "Microbial diversity during maturation and natural processing of coffee cherries of Coffee Arabica in Brazil" (60) : 251-260, 2000

    40 Petracco M, "Marino Petracco Our Everyday Cup of Coffee: The Chemistry behind Its Magic" 82 (82): 1161-, 2005

    41 Gerhard A. Jansen, "Magic-Art-Science Physical changes and chemical reactions" 2007

    42 Petracco M, "Isolation and characterization of a foaming fraction from hot water extracts of roasted coffee" 18 : 95-105, 1999

    43 Ferrari M, "Interfacial properties of coffee oils" 365 : 79-82, 2010

    44 Sievetz, M, "In Search of Coffee Aroma" Tea & Coffee Trade J 1-7, 1985

    45 Gonalez-Rios O, "Impact of “ecological” postharvest processing on the volatile fraction of coffee beans: I. Geen coffee" (20) : 289-296, 2007

    46 Kenneth Davids, "Home Coffee Roasting" 교문사 79-81, 2012

    47 Alegandro Mand, "Examining the case of green coffee to illustrate the limitations of grading systems/expert tasters in sensory evaluation for quality control" (13) : 355-367, 2002

    48 Illy A, "Espresso Coffee: The science of quality" Elsevier Academic press 91-311, 2004

    49 Petracco M., "Coffee recent developments" 140-, 2001

    50 Clarke R, "Coffee Technology" 201-211, 1987

    51 Schilter, B., "Coffee Recent Developments" A Blackwell Science Company 166-, 2001

    52 Smith, A.W., "Coffee : Chemistry(Vol.l)" Elsevier Applied Science Publishers Ltd 14-, 1985

    53 Feria-Morales A.M., "Changes in cup quality-effect of irrigation on the sensory quality of a cup of coffee" ICO 1990

    54 Feria-Morales A.M., "Changes in cup quality when using innovative field practices-use of selective harvesting and wet processing to improve the quality of coffee with(Rioy)characteristics from Fazenda monte Verde" ICO 1990

    55 Feria-Morales A.M., "Changes in cup quality when using innovative field practices-use of selective harvesting and wet processing to improve the quality of coffee with (Rioy) characteristics from Fazenda monte Verde" ICO 1990

    56 D’Amicis, A., "Caffeine, Coffee and Health" Ravin Press 1-16, 1993

    57 유대준, "COFFEE INSIDE" 해밀 & Co 21-282, 2009

    58 유대준, "COFFEE INSIDE" 라이언 컴퍼니 65-127, 2013

    59 Nehlig, A., "Are we dependent upon coffee and caffeine? A review on human and animal data" 23 : 563-576, 1999

    60 Rita C, Alves, "Acrylamide in espresso coffee: Influence of species, roast degree and brew length" 119 : 929-934, 2010

    61 Stella, A., "ABC북 커피" 창해 64-65, 2001

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2014-01-28 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korea Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research -> International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 신청제한 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-12-25 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korea Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2006-03-29 학술지등록 한글명 : 관광연구저널
    외국어명 : 미등록
    KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.95 1.95 1.84
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.82 1.8 2.18 0.68
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼