학술적 논문의 대조수사학적 연구 : 모어화자의 학술논문과 학습자의 학술보고서 분석을 바탕으로 = A study on academic writings between native speakers and Korean learners based on contrasitive rhetoric

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study analyses the differences between academic papers written by Korean native speakers and Korean learners based upon genre approach and contrasitive rhetoric theories. This paper attempts to demonstrate essay writing patterns for Korean learners with academic purposes from the perspective of contrasitive rhetoric analysis. For this purpose, this paper refers to the analyses of Swales(1990), Williams(2004), Harklau(1994) and tries to differentiate discourse structures, discourse markers and verbs, descriptions of conclusions of papers written by Korean native speakers and foreign Korean learners respectively. This paper finds that Korean language learners' papers reveal low proficiency in areas such as discourse structures, usage of effective discourse markers, conclusion deduction, which suggests necessity of essay writing instruction for academic purposes. This paper contribute to design of contrasitive rhetoric research and evaluation of Korean learners in the future by exploring the differences in stylistic patterns appeared in different cultures.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박은선, "한국어 학위논문 서론의 장르 분석적 연구" 이화여자대학교 2006

2 김정숙, "학문적 목적의 한국어 교육과정 설계를 위한 기초 연구. 대학 진학생을 위한 교육과정을 중심으로" 11 (11): 1-19, 2000

3 전수정, "학문목적 읽기 교육을 위한 한국어 학습자의 요구 분석 연구" 연세대학교 2004

4 이덕희, "요구분석을 통한 학문목적의 한국어 교육과정 설계 연구" 연세대학교 2004

5 용재은, "대학 수학 목적의 한국어 읽기, 쓰기 교육 방안 연구: 학문적 텍스트의 분석과 적용을 중심으로" 고려대학교 2004

6 Eggington,W.G., "Written academic discourse in Korean: Implications for effective communication. In U, Connor & R Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of second language text" Rowley, MA: Newbury House 153-168, 1987

7 Upton, T., "Using computerized corpus analysis to investigate the text linguistic discourse moves of a genre" 20 (20): 313-329, 2001

8 Hyland.K., "Teaching and researching writing" London, UK: Longman 2002

9 Mckay,S.L., "Researching second language classrooms" Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlabaum 2006

10 Patton,M.Q., "Qualitative evaluation and research methods" Newbury Park, CA: Sage 1990

11 Williams,H., "Lexical frames and reported speech" 58 (58): 247-257, 2004

12 Lazaraton, A., "Incidental displays of cultural knowledge in the nonnative-English speaking teacher's classroom" 37 (37): 213-246,

13 Swales,J.M., "Genre analysis: English in academic and research setting" Cambridge:Cambridge University press 1990

14 Land, C., "Evaluating second language essays in regular composition classes: Toward a pluralistic U.S. rhetoric. In D. Johnson & D. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing" New York: Longman 284-293, 1989

15 이경림, "Effects of genre-based tasks on Korean EFL high school students' writing in English" 이화여자대학교 2006

16 Harklau,L., "ESL versus mainstream classes: Contrasting L2 learning environments" 28 (28): 241-272, 1994

17 Kaplan,R.B., "Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education" 1-20, 1966

18 Hinds,J., "Contrastive rhetoric: English and Japanese" 183-95, 1983

19 Mohan, B. A., "Academic writing and Chinese students: Transfer and developmental factors" 19 (19): 513-534, 1985

20 Hyland,K., "Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge" 341-367, 1999

21 Lee,S., "A study of Korean and English research paper introductions based on Swales move analysis" 17 (17): 23-53, 2001

22 Reid,J., "A computer text analysis of four cohesive devices in English discourse by native and nonnative writers" 1 (1): 79-108, 1992