RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      경제적 개념으로서의 사회적 디자인 고찰 = Research on social design as an economic concept

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103332049

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Developed material civilization and an information-oriented society today are originated mainly from economical mass production method moved from the Industrial Revolution and development of science technology moved from capital accumulation. In the reverse side of this development, there have been an economic logic between profit acquisition of corporation and consumers who only pursue reasonable consumption by sacrificing definite resources of the Earth to indefinite economic development logic. The economic conception is a core factor of the industrial development on the basis of reasonable rationalism, but it is undeniable that it has caused a few social problems such as environment destruction, humanity neglect, income inequality, and loss of consumes` sovereignty in the reverse side. Recently, this reasonable economic logic has been embraced as a cause of social inequality and this fact affects designs and designers who played a role of inducing forms of human society and life style. Design doesn`t stay in reality of economic logic, but it has a function of lingual expression and increasingly, it affects our thoughts and behaviors. Therefore, we should see design from a systematic point of view that it affects social structure based on various functions for social structures of humans as a vehicle of recognition and emotion field of ours. The consciousness that human structure can be changed through design requires a new point of view and counterplan. While design played a spearhead of economic logic in the past, social functions and roles in order to make a sustainable society will be more important in the future. In this study, I took a look a social function of design, which its importance is getting embraced, based on roles of social design a nd a relation with ethical consumers. This study is designed to suggest the fact that solutions of approaching methods of environment friendly that was hard to achieve even with our will can ben found in setting a new relationship between corporations and consumers and the future economy logic should be recognized as a broad concept including profit pursue, social responsibility and roles.
      Through this study, it is suggested that it is more economically efficient for the concept of social design, which was believed to be low efficient and less economical in the past, to be a practical tool of ethical life style through creative consumptions to consumers and corporations accomplishing social responsibility. This implies that the roles of design and designers should be re-defined for revitalizing the recovered economy through social design and entering sustainable society ultimately.
      번역하기

      Developed material civilization and an information-oriented society today are originated mainly from economical mass production method moved from the Industrial Revolution and development of science technology moved from capital accumulation. In the r...

      Developed material civilization and an information-oriented society today are originated mainly from economical mass production method moved from the Industrial Revolution and development of science technology moved from capital accumulation. In the reverse side of this development, there have been an economic logic between profit acquisition of corporation and consumers who only pursue reasonable consumption by sacrificing definite resources of the Earth to indefinite economic development logic. The economic conception is a core factor of the industrial development on the basis of reasonable rationalism, but it is undeniable that it has caused a few social problems such as environment destruction, humanity neglect, income inequality, and loss of consumes` sovereignty in the reverse side. Recently, this reasonable economic logic has been embraced as a cause of social inequality and this fact affects designs and designers who played a role of inducing forms of human society and life style. Design doesn`t stay in reality of economic logic, but it has a function of lingual expression and increasingly, it affects our thoughts and behaviors. Therefore, we should see design from a systematic point of view that it affects social structure based on various functions for social structures of humans as a vehicle of recognition and emotion field of ours. The consciousness that human structure can be changed through design requires a new point of view and counterplan. While design played a spearhead of economic logic in the past, social functions and roles in order to make a sustainable society will be more important in the future. In this study, I took a look a social function of design, which its importance is getting embraced, based on roles of social design a nd a relation with ethical consumers. This study is designed to suggest the fact that solutions of approaching methods of environment friendly that was hard to achieve even with our will can ben found in setting a new relationship between corporations and consumers and the future economy logic should be recognized as a broad concept including profit pursue, social responsibility and roles.
      Through this study, it is suggested that it is more economically efficient for the concept of social design, which was believed to be low efficient and less economical in the past, to be a practical tool of ethical life style through creative consumptions to consumers and corporations accomplishing social responsibility. This implies that the roles of design and designers should be re-defined for revitalizing the recovered economy through social design and entering sustainable society ultimately.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박연실, "정서적 디자인의 분석:도널드 A.노먼의 디자인 심리학을 중심으로" 홍익대 대학원 2008

      2 홍연금, "윤리적소비자에 관한 사례연구" 카톨릭대학교 대학원 2009

      3 윌리엄맥도너, "요람에서 요람으로" 에코리브르 2003

      4 서정희, "소비트렌드 예측의 이론과 방법" 내하출판사 2006

      5 표현명, "서비스디자인시대" 안그라픽스 2008

      6 나이젤 휘틀리, "사회를 위한 디자인" 시지락 2004

      7 폴호켄, "비즈니스생태학" 에코리브르 2004

      8 이대일, "디자인에서의 기능과 디자인의 사회적 기능" 7 (7): 1999

      9 리처드탈러, "넛지(Nudge)" (주)웅진씽크빅 2009

      10 정기한, "기업의 사회적 책임,이미지,신뢰,몰입,고객충성도 간의 관계에 관한 연구"

      1 박연실, "정서적 디자인의 분석:도널드 A.노먼의 디자인 심리학을 중심으로" 홍익대 대학원 2008

      2 홍연금, "윤리적소비자에 관한 사례연구" 카톨릭대학교 대학원 2009

      3 윌리엄맥도너, "요람에서 요람으로" 에코리브르 2003

      4 서정희, "소비트렌드 예측의 이론과 방법" 내하출판사 2006

      5 표현명, "서비스디자인시대" 안그라픽스 2008

      6 나이젤 휘틀리, "사회를 위한 디자인" 시지락 2004

      7 폴호켄, "비즈니스생태학" 에코리브르 2004

      8 이대일, "디자인에서의 기능과 디자인의 사회적 기능" 7 (7): 1999

      9 리처드탈러, "넛지(Nudge)" (주)웅진씽크빅 2009

      10 정기한, "기업의 사회적 책임,이미지,신뢰,몰입,고객충성도 간의 관계에 관한 연구"

      11 "http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/dan_pink_on_motivation.html"

      12 "http://www.socialinnovationexchange.org/designforsi/whatisdesignandsocialinnovation"

      13 "http://www.socialinnovationexchang.org/designforsi"

      14 "http://www.socialenterprise.or.kr/"

      15 "http://www.artecnicainc.com"

      16 "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow's_hierarchy"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2014-09-02 학회명변경 영문명 : Society of Korea Design Trend -> Korea Society of Design Trend KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-12-13 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korea Design Forum -> Journal of Korea Design Forum KCI등재
      2007-10-24 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국과학예술디자인학회 -> 한국디자인트렌드학회
      영문명 : Korea Science & art Academy of Design (KSAD) -> Society of Korea Design Trend
      KCI등재
      2007-04-23 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국디자인트랜드학회 -> 한국과학예술디자인학회
      영문명 : Korea Design Trend Association -> Korea Science & art Academy of Design (KSAD)
      KCI등재
      2006-06-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal Korea Society of Design Forum -> Korea Design Forum KCI등재
      2006-02-06 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국디자인포럼학회 -> 한국디자인트랜드학회
      영문명 : The Korea Society of Design Forum -> Korea Design Trend Association
      KCI등재
      2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-10-31 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korea Sociaty of design forum -> The Korea Society of Design Forum KCI등재후보
      2005-10-12 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국디자인포름 -> 한국디자인포럼
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal Korea Society of Design Forum
      KCI등재후보
      2005-09-26 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국비쥬얼디자인학회 -> 한국디자인포럼학회
      영문명 : The Korea Sociaty Of Visual Design -> The Korea Sociaty of design forum
      KCI등재후보
      2005-05-30 학술지등록 한글명 : 한국디자인포름
      외국어명 : 미등록
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.43 0.43 0.45
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.43 0.43 0.631 0.12
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼