분단 기억과 가족 서사 = 김원일의 <손풍금>을 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The objective of this article is to discuss the meaning of multiple memory statements and the family boundaries arising from such meaning, focusing on An Accordion of Won-il Kim. Gyeong-sik, who is the narrator in Chapters 1 and 3, seeks to grant Gwang-su Park, who was the brother of his grandfather, a status as a family member of human substance, rather than as a ghost wandering through rumor, by restoring Gwang-su Park`s life through a work of literature called ‘Research on the People, Gwang-su Park - A Life of a Socialist during the Time of Division.’ The motive for summoning Gwang-su Park is that he was considered ‘a scapegoat of the reality of the divided nation’ and ‘an elder of the household,’ thus, the literary work can be understood as one that confirms that Gwang-su Park was clearly a family member, based on the logic of blood-relationship. The representation of the memories of family members regarding Gwang-su Park appears to be diverse, however, such diversity rather helps the overall restoration of Gwang-su Park. Another important point here lies in the meaning of the acts of family members themselves, when they narrate their memories, because the fact that the family members share a memory of Gwang-su Park can be seen as an opportunity to prove that they all form one family. By recalling memories, they could confirm by themselves that they belonged within the same family boundary as Gwang-su Park. However, Do-su Park, the most important informant who is the narrator`s grandfather, remains silent, which may be because his recollection process did not reach a level worth mentioning. In Do-su Park`s narrative based on perspective, he equally values his current family members as ‘others’ when Gwang-su Park is involved. Such logic arises because he accepts the meaning of the existence of Gwang-su Park in a twofold way. Thus, Do-su Park`s concept of family is being re-established in his own method of responding to the history of suffering. As a result, it can be interpreted that Do-su Park purposely posed himself to become a stranger to his current family. In particular, the fact that he did not engage in passing down his memories to his descendants may be the most definite basis to name him as a familial stranger. The meaning of the intended act of oblivion by Do-su Park is also related to this fact.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 임춘식, "현대사회와 노인문제" 유풍출판사 1991

2 류종렬, "한국 현대 노년소설 연구사" 한국문학회 (50) : 501-536, 2008

3 김원일, "제2회황순원문학상 수상작품집" 중앙M&B 2002

4 전진성, "역사가 기억을 말하다" 휴머니스트 2005

5 양진오, "사회주의자의 문학적 재현과 의미- 「손풍금」을 중심으로 -" 우리말글학회 42 : 305-329, 2008

6 성민엽, "변하는 것과 변하지 않는 것" 문학과지성사 2004

7 양진오, "당대의 한국문학, 한국문학의 당대" 한국문화사 2012

8 정주아, "김원일 소설에 나타난 기억 방식 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2005

9 이성희, "김원일 소설 <손풍금>의 서술형식연구" 한국문학회 (49) : 163-190, 2008

10 정재림, "기억의 회복과 분단 극복의 의지" 한국현대소설학회 (30) : 185-210, 2006

11 김원일, "기억의 풍경들 (산문집)" 작가 2007

12 유임하, "기억의 심연" 이회문화사 2002

13 변학수, "기억의 공간" 그린비 2011

14 오카 마리, "기억 서사" 소명출판 2004

15 최광호, "기록의 특성에 관한 연구: 행위 반영성·커뮤니케이션적 특성·상징성·시간성" 명지대학교 기록과학대학원 2003

16 윤택림, "구술사, 기억으로 쓰는 역사" 아르케 2010

17 권명아, "가족이야기는 어떻게 만들어지는가" 책세상 2000

18 김윤식, "2002황순원문학상 수상작품집" 중앙 M&B 2002