RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    6~7세기에 나타나는 삼국 형률의 적용 양상과 특징 = The applied aspects and features of the Three Kingdom`s Penal Code(刑律) in the 6~7th Centuries

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100176911

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This research is to illuminate similarities and differences of the Penal Code between the Three Kingdoms and Chinese. It was examined by comparing the crime, such as the sin of rebellion(謀反·叛), theft(盜), robbery(劫) and cheonheung(擅興). In the Three Kingdoms, death penalty for rebellion was both public chamhyeong(斬刑). It was enforced by purification ritual with water or fire. And punishment for theft(盜) was based on compensation. In fact, it is clear that the terms of Penal Code have existed, but application of the law can occur in various ways by depending on the social conditions and the customary law`s basis of each society. Features of Penal Code in the Three Kingdoms was no the punishment of labor(徒刑) and hanging(絞刑). Enslavement was not an additional punishment but an independent punishment, it was placed in the punishment of labor of China. The punishment of labor in China had an educational significance and included Confucian contents. On the other hand, enslavement in the Three Kingdoms was done in terms of compensation for the property along with the rigor of punishment. The punishment of hanging(絞刑) in China was a relaxed form of death penalty In the sense of simply deprivation of life. However, there was no the punishment of hanging(絞刑) in the Three Kingdoms. I would guess that it`s absence was not simply deprivation of life but openly purification ritual, and showed an emulsion of tradition which expected effects of vigilance.
    번역하기

    This research is to illuminate similarities and differences of the Penal Code between the Three Kingdoms and Chinese. It was examined by comparing the crime, such as the sin of rebellion(謀反·叛), theft(盜), robbery(劫) and cheonheung(擅興). I...

    This research is to illuminate similarities and differences of the Penal Code between the Three Kingdoms and Chinese. It was examined by comparing the crime, such as the sin of rebellion(謀反·叛), theft(盜), robbery(劫) and cheonheung(擅興). In the Three Kingdoms, death penalty for rebellion was both public chamhyeong(斬刑). It was enforced by purification ritual with water or fire. And punishment for theft(盜) was based on compensation. In fact, it is clear that the terms of Penal Code have existed, but application of the law can occur in various ways by depending on the social conditions and the customary law`s basis of each society. Features of Penal Code in the Three Kingdoms was no the punishment of labor(徒刑) and hanging(絞刑). Enslavement was not an additional punishment but an independent punishment, it was placed in the punishment of labor of China. The punishment of labor in China had an educational significance and included Confucian contents. On the other hand, enslavement in the Three Kingdoms was done in terms of compensation for the property along with the rigor of punishment. The punishment of hanging(絞刑) in China was a relaxed form of death penalty In the sense of simply deprivation of life. However, there was no the punishment of hanging(絞刑) in the Three Kingdoms. I would guess that it`s absence was not simply deprivation of life but openly purification ritual, and showed an emulsion of tradition which expected effects of vigilance.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 한영화, "한국 고대사회의 형벌권의 추이-‘율령’ 반포 이전을 중심으로-" 고려사학회 (47) : 7-34, 2012

    2 니시다 다이이치로, "중국형법사연구" 신서원 1998

    3 張晋藩, "중국법제사" 소나무 2006

    4 김택민, "중국고대 형법-당제국의 형법 총칙--" 아카넷 2002

    5 도미야 이타루, "유골의 증언" 서경문화사 1999

    6 윤재석, "수호지진묘죽간 역주" 소명출판사 2010

    7 盧重國, "高句麗律令에 關한 一試論" 21 : 1979

    8 鄭東俊, "高句麗․百濟律令における中國王朝の影響についての試論-所謂「泰始律令繼受說」をめぐって-" 210 : 2013

    9 韓容根, "韓國史의 理解-古代考古編" 신서원 1991

    10 한영화, "韓國 古代의 刑律 硏究" 성균관대학교 2012

    1 한영화, "한국 고대사회의 형벌권의 추이-‘율령’ 반포 이전을 중심으로-" 고려사학회 (47) : 7-34, 2012

    2 니시다 다이이치로, "중국형법사연구" 신서원 1998

    3 張晋藩, "중국법제사" 소나무 2006

    4 김택민, "중국고대 형법-당제국의 형법 총칙--" 아카넷 2002

    5 도미야 이타루, "유골의 증언" 서경문화사 1999

    6 윤재석, "수호지진묘죽간 역주" 소명출판사 2010

    7 盧重國, "高句麗律令에 關한 一試論" 21 : 1979

    8 鄭東俊, "高句麗․百濟律令における中國王朝の影響についての試論-所謂「泰始律令繼受說」をめぐって-" 210 : 2013

    9 韓容根, "韓國史의 理解-古代考古編" 신서원 1991

    10 한영화, "韓國 古代의 刑律 硏究" 성균관대학교 2012

    11 李根雨, "赦免記事를 통해 본 韓日 律令制 수용문제" 16 (16): 2002

    12 金鐸敏, "譯註 唐六典上․下" 신서원 2005

    13 富谷至, "秦漢刑罰制度の硏究" 同朋舍 1998

    14 미즈마 다이스케, "秦律·漢律における傷害罪の類型 -張家山漢簡「二年律令」を中心に-" 중국사학회 28 (28): 1-36, 2004

    15 富谷至, "東アヅアの死刑" 京都大學學術出版會 2008

    16 洪承佑, "新羅律의 基本性格-刑罰體系를 중심으로" 50 : 2004

    17 朱甫暾, "新羅時代의 連坐制" 25 : 1984

    18 鄭東俊, "新羅律令に對する中國律令の影響-國家秩序維持關係の法令を中心に" 63 : 2014

    19 윤선태, "新羅 中代의 刑律" 3 : 2003

    20 井上光貞, "律令" 岩波書店 1976

    21 張家山二四七號漢墓竹簡整理小組, "張家山漢墓竹簡" 文物出版社 2006

    22 仁井田陞, "唐令拾遺" 東京大學出版會 1964

    23 任大熙, "名例․各則(上)․各則(下)" 한국법제연구원 1998

    24 姜鳳龍, "三國時期의 律令과 ‘民’의 存在形態" 78 : 1992

    25 한영화, "7∼8세기 신라의 형률과 그 운용 -君臣關係에 관한 형률 적용 사례를 중심으로-" 한국고대사학회 (44) : 229-267, 2006

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.24 1.24 1.08
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.95 0.86 1.883 0.16
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼