RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      A Comparative Study of Governance in State Management: Focusing on the Roh Moo-hyun Government and the Lee Myung-bak Government

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60035694

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study aims to explore development discourses of the Roh Moo-hyun and Lee Myung-bak governments and evaluate their governance in achieving their respective visions of development. The two governments advocate sustainable development and green growth, respectively, as their national development paradigms, and strategies, laws, and organizations were developed to realize their goals. This research analysis reveals that the Roh administration perceived and reflected the concept and the importance of governance into its own policy framework while the Lee administration has not. The Roh administration perceived civil society as the subject of governance and policy process whereas the Lee administration perceives it as the object. In conclusion, the Roh administration can summarily be described as non-authoritarian with civil societycentered governance that pursues sustainable development, while the Lee administration is authoritarian with token state-centered governance that pursues green growth. This difference results from the difference between the nature of development discourse, principles of government management, perception of governance, leadership style and values, and the support basis of each government.
      번역하기

      This study aims to explore development discourses of the Roh Moo-hyun and Lee Myung-bak governments and evaluate their governance in achieving their respective visions of development. The two governments advocate sustainable development and green grow...

      This study aims to explore development discourses of the Roh Moo-hyun and Lee Myung-bak governments and evaluate their governance in achieving their respective visions of development. The two governments advocate sustainable development and green growth, respectively, as their national development paradigms, and strategies, laws, and organizations were developed to realize their goals. This research analysis reveals that the Roh administration perceived and reflected the concept and the importance of governance into its own policy framework while the Lee administration has not. The Roh administration perceived civil society as the subject of governance and policy process whereas the Lee administration perceives it as the object. In conclusion, the Roh administration can summarily be described as non-authoritarian with civil societycentered governance that pursues sustainable development, while the Lee administration is authoritarian with token state-centered governance that pursues green growth. This difference results from the difference between the nature of development discourse, principles of government management, perception of governance, leadership style and values, and the support basis of each government.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 정규호, "환경갈등에 대한 거버넌스적 접근의 함의와 과제:시화지역과 굴포천유역 ‘지속가능발전협의회’의 경험" 한국사회과학연구회 71 (71): 114-152, 2007

      2 박재창, "협력적 거버넌스의 구축과 NGO의 정책과정 참여: 참여 정부를 중심으로" 한국정책과학학회 11 (11): 221-250, 2007

      3 임혁백, "한국의 대통령제 거버넌스 모색:제도와 운영방식을 중심으로" 아세아문제연구소 46 (46): 193-223, 2003

      4 류지성, "한국 역대 정부의 거버넌스 유형 분석에 관한 연구: 국정 목표를 중심으로" 한국행정사학회 27 (27): 163-196, 2010

      5 이연호, "지속가능발전정책 거버넌스의 평가" 동서문제연구원 22 (22): 7-45, 2010

      6 이상헌, "지속가능발전위원회의 지속 가능성 제도화 평가: 한탄강 댐 갈등조정 사례를 중심으로" 한국사회과학연구회 64 (64): 154-184, 2005

      7 라미경, "거버넌스 연구의 현재적 쟁점" 한국거버넌스학회 16 (16): 91-107, 2009

      8 윤순진, "‘저탄소 녹색성장’의 이념적 기초와 실재" 한국환경사회학회 13 (13): 219-266, 2009

      9 Global Campaign on Urban Governance, "Urban Governance Index: Conceptual Foundation and Field Test Report" The UN Habitat 2004

      10 Kim, Suk-joon, "Understanding of Governance" Daeyoung. Written in Korean 2002

      1 정규호, "환경갈등에 대한 거버넌스적 접근의 함의와 과제:시화지역과 굴포천유역 ‘지속가능발전협의회’의 경험" 한국사회과학연구회 71 (71): 114-152, 2007

      2 박재창, "협력적 거버넌스의 구축과 NGO의 정책과정 참여: 참여 정부를 중심으로" 한국정책과학학회 11 (11): 221-250, 2007

      3 임혁백, "한국의 대통령제 거버넌스 모색:제도와 운영방식을 중심으로" 아세아문제연구소 46 (46): 193-223, 2003

      4 류지성, "한국 역대 정부의 거버넌스 유형 분석에 관한 연구: 국정 목표를 중심으로" 한국행정사학회 27 (27): 163-196, 2010

      5 이연호, "지속가능발전정책 거버넌스의 평가" 동서문제연구원 22 (22): 7-45, 2010

      6 이상헌, "지속가능발전위원회의 지속 가능성 제도화 평가: 한탄강 댐 갈등조정 사례를 중심으로" 한국사회과학연구회 64 (64): 154-184, 2005

      7 라미경, "거버넌스 연구의 현재적 쟁점" 한국거버넌스학회 16 (16): 91-107, 2009

      8 윤순진, "‘저탄소 녹색성장’의 이념적 기초와 실재" 한국환경사회학회 13 (13): 219-266, 2009

      9 Global Campaign on Urban Governance, "Urban Governance Index: Conceptual Foundation and Field Test Report" The UN Habitat 2004

      10 Kim, Suk-joon, "Understanding of Governance" Daeyoung. Written in Korean 2002

      11 Urban Governance Initiative, "The Urban Governance Initiative (UNDPTUGI)" 15 (15): 159-169, 2003

      12 Hahm, Sung Deuk, "The Difference between CEO Leadership and Political Leadership" 78 (78): 2008

      13 Kim, Suk-joon, "Politics of Governance" Bobmoonsa. Written in Korean 2002

      14 Presidential Committee on Green Growth, "National Strategy for Green Growth" PCGG 2009

      15 Hahm, Tae-seong, "Legal Interpretation and Contradiction of Framework Act on Low Carbon Green Growth" 2009

      16 Evans, Bob, "LASALA: Evaluating Local Agenda 21 in Europe" 46 (46): 781-194, 2003

      17 Ministry of Knowledge Economy, "Industrial Development Strategy for Green Growth Based on Knowledge and Innovation" Ministry of Knowledge Economy 2008

      18 OECD, "Improving Policy Coherence and Integration for Sustainable Development: A Checklist"

      19 Pierre, Jon, "Governance, Politics and the State" Palgrave Macmillan 2000

      20 Na, Moon Young, "Governance of Check and Collaboration: Governance Evaluation of Lee Myung-Bak Government" Pusan National University 2010

      21 Song, Vo Kyung, "Governance and the Role of NGOs. Collection of Treatises on Women" Women’s Studies Institute 2004

      22 Jessop, Bob, "Governance and Metagovernance: On Reflexivity, Requisite Variety, and Requisite Irony"

      23 Kim, Jung-ryul, "Future of Government for the Governance: New Public Management and Policy Network" 34 (34): 21-39, 2000

      24 Ministry of Governmental Legislation, "Framework Act and Its Presidential Decree on Low Carbon, Green Growth in Korea" MGL 2010

      25 Han, Jong Ho, "Charisma of CEOs-Turned-Presidents" 48 (48): 43-49, 2008

      26 Kim, Ho-ki, "Building a Governance Model for Participatory Democracy" The Presidential Commission on Policy Planning. Written in Korean 2005

      27 Access Initiative, "Assessing Access to Information, Participation, and Justice for the Environment: A Guide" The World Resource Institute 2003

      28 Ministry of Environment, "An Analysis on the Status of Local Agenda 21 and Development of Evaluation Index" MOE 2001

      29 Yun, Sun-Jin, "A Study on the Current Status of Green Growth and Exploration of Democratic Governance for Realization of Green Society" 32 (32): 7-33, 2009

      30 Jeong, Guy-ho, "A Study on the Consensus-Building-Mechanism in the Urban Governance for Sustainability: Analysis on the Decision-Making Process of Citizen’s Committee for Green" Seoul National University 2002

      31 Ko, Jae-kyung, "A Study on Governance Evaluation" Gyeonggi Research Institute 2007

      32 World Bank, "A Decade of Measuring the Quality of Governance: Governance Matters 2007" World Bank Institute 2007

      33 Kim, Yeon-ji, "A Critical Analysis on ‘Low Carbon, Green Growth’ of the Lee Myung-bak Government: From a Perspective of Environmental Modernization" Kyunghee University 2010

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2019-03-31 학술지명변경 한글명 : Development and Society -> Journal of Asian Sociology
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Asian Sociology
      KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.19 0.19 0.18
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.27 0.26 0.452 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼