RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      전투력 요소로 본 이순신의 전투준비태세와 초기전투 승리요인

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101857204

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study focuses on how General Lee achieved continuous victories in the beginning of Japanese invasion. Unlike previous studies that focused on the victory factors on the water, this study focuses on analyses of General Lee’s combat preparation and emphasized combat capability during initial stages of battles, which defeated Japanese forces.
      The background of General Lee’s substantial war preparation came from the battle of Japanese invasion led by Hong-Yang in the Year of Jeong-Hae (1587). By developing the foundation for discipline and commanding system based on the past experience, Lee focused on creative, yet stuck to the basic war-preparation. One of Lee’s creative works was that he collected information of Japanese combat style to create his battle strategies: to deny enemy"s climbing up the warship, but to be close enough to target enemy ships with turtle ships, and to inspect the war preparations. For the war preparations, Lee inspected ships, various weapons, and defense system on the field. But most importantly, Lee’s victorious background originated from his nationally scaled propulsion for increasing the number of war-ships, development of cannons specially designed for battles against Japanese forces.
      When the actual Lim-Gin Japanese invasion occurred, Lee was fully prepared to go to the war against Japan by utilizing the effective reporting system, which reached to Right naval HQ located in Jeon-Ra provinces, observatory posts, and central government in a very short time. Lee also prepared for all possible routes of Japanese incomings and settled his navy on sea of Gyeong-Sang waiting for the imminent battle command from the government.
      In order to execute Command & Control system in the battle at the sea of Gyeong-Sang, Lee required strict command system, and hierarchy with Won-Gyun and Uk-Gi Lee’s fleet, which allowed well-coordinated strategic system. Also, strategy integrated intelligence, maneuver, fires, and force protections against Japanese Force. First, spot the enemy, approach with fleets during earl dawn when security is assured, then charge with turtle ships and full-on assailment of cannons with Pan-Ok ships to defeat Japanese Navy. After such strategy, Lee quickly ran away from the battle scene in order to prepare for the possible ambush attacks and buy some maintenance time for his navy. In summary, Lee achieved the victory via analyzing Japanese Navy’s current status, geography, water current, surround and attack strategy, ambush attacks, and effective maneuvers, which integrated with turtle ships and navy’s fire power. He also inspected his forces, fleets, and other weapons to sustain his combat capabilities. He distributed loots from the battles to his soldiers to alleviate their fear and fatigue.
      The most important victory factor would be Lee’s victory oriented leadership. His leadership highlighted field focused operations, principles, executions, and keen discernment, which contributed to flexible strategies, all with courage, fairness, people and his navy.
      In order to win the war, combat capability had to be performed at its best, and Lee’s victories at the initial battles exemplify preparation for the war and successful coordination of combat capability with his leadership in the naval battles.
      번역하기

      This study focuses on how General Lee achieved continuous victories in the beginning of Japanese invasion. Unlike previous studies that focused on the victory factors on the water, this study focuses on analyses of General Lee’s combat preparation a...

      This study focuses on how General Lee achieved continuous victories in the beginning of Japanese invasion. Unlike previous studies that focused on the victory factors on the water, this study focuses on analyses of General Lee’s combat preparation and emphasized combat capability during initial stages of battles, which defeated Japanese forces.
      The background of General Lee’s substantial war preparation came from the battle of Japanese invasion led by Hong-Yang in the Year of Jeong-Hae (1587). By developing the foundation for discipline and commanding system based on the past experience, Lee focused on creative, yet stuck to the basic war-preparation. One of Lee’s creative works was that he collected information of Japanese combat style to create his battle strategies: to deny enemy"s climbing up the warship, but to be close enough to target enemy ships with turtle ships, and to inspect the war preparations. For the war preparations, Lee inspected ships, various weapons, and defense system on the field. But most importantly, Lee’s victorious background originated from his nationally scaled propulsion for increasing the number of war-ships, development of cannons specially designed for battles against Japanese forces.
      When the actual Lim-Gin Japanese invasion occurred, Lee was fully prepared to go to the war against Japan by utilizing the effective reporting system, which reached to Right naval HQ located in Jeon-Ra provinces, observatory posts, and central government in a very short time. Lee also prepared for all possible routes of Japanese incomings and settled his navy on sea of Gyeong-Sang waiting for the imminent battle command from the government.
      In order to execute Command & Control system in the battle at the sea of Gyeong-Sang, Lee required strict command system, and hierarchy with Won-Gyun and Uk-Gi Lee’s fleet, which allowed well-coordinated strategic system. Also, strategy integrated intelligence, maneuver, fires, and force protections against Japanese Force. First, spot the enemy, approach with fleets during earl dawn when security is assured, then charge with turtle ships and full-on assailment of cannons with Pan-Ok ships to defeat Japanese Navy. After such strategy, Lee quickly ran away from the battle scene in order to prepare for the possible ambush attacks and buy some maintenance time for his navy. In summary, Lee achieved the victory via analyzing Japanese Navy’s current status, geography, water current, surround and attack strategy, ambush attacks, and effective maneuvers, which integrated with turtle ships and navy’s fire power. He also inspected his forces, fleets, and other weapons to sustain his combat capabilities. He distributed loots from the battles to his soldiers to alleviate their fear and fatigue.
      The most important victory factor would be Lee’s victory oriented leadership. His leadership highlighted field focused operations, principles, executions, and keen discernment, which contributed to flexible strategies, all with courage, fairness, people and his navy.
      In order to win the war, combat capability had to be performed at its best, and Lee’s victories at the initial battles exemplify preparation for the war and successful coordination of combat capability with his leadership in the naval battles.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 머리말
      • 2. 이순신의 전투준비태세 분석
      • 3. 이순신의 초기전투 승리요인
      • 4. 맺음말
      • 〈ABSTRAC〉
      • 1. 머리말
      • 2. 이순신의 전투준비태세 분석
      • 3. 이순신의 초기전투 승리요인
      • 4. 맺음말
      • 〈ABSTRAC〉
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 金世昻, "李舜臣 提督의 戰略·戰術에 關한 硏究 : 손자병법과 연관성을 중심으로" 慶南大學校 行政大學院 1998

      2 육군본부, "한국군사사 제7권" 육군군사연구소 31-, 2012

      3 육군본부, "한국군사사 권13" 육군군사연구소 421-422, 2012

      4 임원빈, "충무공 이순신의 병법연구" 해군사관학교해군해양연구소 20 : 189-, 1998

      5 김일상, "충무공 이순신과 넬슨 제독의 해전 비교연구" 한국군사평론가학회 안국군사학회 (8) : 236-, 1996

      6 박기봉, "충무공 이순신 전서 제1권" 비봉출판사 161-, 2006

      7 유성룡, "징비록 권 1"

      8 노승석, "증보 교감완역 난중일기" 도서출판 여해 76-, 2014

      9 정진술, "조선수군의 임란 초기대응에 관한 연구" 해군사관학교 해군해양연구소 25 : 45-145, 2000

      10 나종우, "조선 수군의 무기체계와 전술 구사" (10) : 86-89, 1998

      1 金世昻, "李舜臣 提督의 戰略·戰術에 關한 硏究 : 손자병법과 연관성을 중심으로" 慶南大學校 行政大學院 1998

      2 육군본부, "한국군사사 제7권" 육군군사연구소 31-, 2012

      3 육군본부, "한국군사사 권13" 육군군사연구소 421-422, 2012

      4 임원빈, "충무공 이순신의 병법연구" 해군사관학교해군해양연구소 20 : 189-, 1998

      5 김일상, "충무공 이순신과 넬슨 제독의 해전 비교연구" 한국군사평론가학회 안국군사학회 (8) : 236-, 1996

      6 박기봉, "충무공 이순신 전서 제1권" 비봉출판사 161-, 2006

      7 유성룡, "징비록 권 1"

      8 노승석, "증보 교감완역 난중일기" 도서출판 여해 76-, 2014

      9 정진술, "조선수군의 임란 초기대응에 관한 연구" 해군사관학교 해군해양연구소 25 : 45-145, 2000

      10 나종우, "조선 수군의 무기체계와 전술 구사" (10) : 86-89, 1998

      11 제장명, "정유재란 시기 해전과 조선 수군 운용" 부산대학교 대학원 2014

      12 신경, "재조번방지, 권2"

      13 이민웅, "임진왜란 해전사" 청어람미디어 308-, 2004

      14 이민웅, "임진왜란 초기 해전 연구 Ⅰ" 해군사관학교해군해양연구소 39 : 121-, 2007

      15 이민웅, "임진왜란 시기 호남 수군의 활약과 전략전술" (재)민족문화유산연구원 61-, 2014

      16 최두환, "임란시의 원형 거북선에 관한 연구" 22 : 147-148, 1999

      17 정진술, "임란수군활동연구논총" 해군군사연구실 169-170, 1993

      18 "이충무공전서 권2"

      19 나종우, "이순신장군의 전략전술" 5 : 79-97, 1981

      20 김강녕, "이순신의 해전:주요 승전사례와 전쟁사적 의의" (69) : 170-, 2012

      21 이민웅, "이순신 평전" 성안당 72-, 2012

      22 김태준, "이순신 장군의 해전승리 요인 분석" 44 : 83-95, 2007

      23 "선조실록"

      24 "선조수정실록"

      25 "선묘중흥지 권1"

      26 "난중일기"

      27 도쿠토미 이이치로, "近世日本國民史豊臣氏時代 丁編" 646-, 1921

      28 Headquarters Department of the Army, "Operations FM 3-0"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2017-10-23 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Military History Institute, MND KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-06-29 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> military history KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.69 0.69 0.62
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.63 0.6 1.024 0.34
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼