RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    도로비탈면 녹화공사 평가방법의 개선 방안 연구 - 절토부 토사를 중심으로 - = A Study on the Improvement of Evaluation Methods for Roadside Slope Revegetation -Focus on the Cut-soil Slope-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107195711

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Despite the eco-friendly route plan, road slopes were collapsed due to road construction, resulting in human and property damage. To solve this problem, the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs established guidelines in 2009 to conduct a test-bed for slope recording considering the conditions of the site and the ecological environment, and divided them into recording quality and economic evaluation. The following results were obtained by analyzing 183 construction methods of cut-soil sections at 60 sites from 2012 to 2018 for road slope afforestation research. Straw net+seedspray, vegetation media spray method 1T, 3T were used the most, and vegetation media spray method 3T(patent) was excellent in quality, and straw net+seedspray was excellent in economics. As a result of analyzing the market unit price and the construction unit price, vegetation media spray method submitted the construction unit price at up to 60% lower than the market unit price. As a result of the analysis of the key factors of the greening method evaluation, the economic assessment had the greatest influence on all evaluation items. Problems in the evaluation method of revegetation were first identified as problems in the allocation of points and secondly as problems in the evaluation criteria. As for the improvement of the economic assessment criteria, the method was proposed to evaluate the same method based on market unit price when the same method was constructed, and not to conduct an economic assessment if there was a difference in market unit price between methods, or to add weight to the scores. Based on the monitoring data of 60 road slopes, this study drew up problems and improvement measures. However, with regard to scoring, research on appropriate scoring is needed by examining the current status.
    번역하기

    Despite the eco-friendly route plan, road slopes were collapsed due to road construction, resulting in human and property damage. To solve this problem, the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs established guidelines in 2009 to conduct a t...

    Despite the eco-friendly route plan, road slopes were collapsed due to road construction, resulting in human and property damage. To solve this problem, the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs established guidelines in 2009 to conduct a test-bed for slope recording considering the conditions of the site and the ecological environment, and divided them into recording quality and economic evaluation. The following results were obtained by analyzing 183 construction methods of cut-soil sections at 60 sites from 2012 to 2018 for road slope afforestation research. Straw net+seedspray, vegetation media spray method 1T, 3T were used the most, and vegetation media spray method 3T(patent) was excellent in quality, and straw net+seedspray was excellent in economics. As a result of analyzing the market unit price and the construction unit price, vegetation media spray method submitted the construction unit price at up to 60% lower than the market unit price. As a result of the analysis of the key factors of the greening method evaluation, the economic assessment had the greatest influence on all evaluation items. Problems in the evaluation method of revegetation were first identified as problems in the allocation of points and secondly as problems in the evaluation criteria. As for the improvement of the economic assessment criteria, the method was proposed to evaluate the same method based on market unit price when the same method was constructed, and not to conduct an economic assessment if there was a difference in market unit price between methods, or to add weight to the scores. Based on the monitoring data of 60 road slopes, this study drew up problems and improvement measures. However, with regard to scoring, research on appropriate scoring is needed by examining the current status.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김남춘, "화강풍화토 흙깎기 비탈면 녹화공법 선정 방안 연구" 한국환경복원기술학회 19 (19): 121-135, 2016

    2 전기성, "폐도로 생태복원을 위한 시험시공지 평가 연구 - 경부선 영동군 황간지역 시험시공지에 대한 시공 후 7년 시점의 추적조사 -" 한국환경복원기술학회 19 (19): 47-57, 2016

    3 김태국, "도로비탈면 녹화공사의 사후환경평가 항목 제언" 한국환경복원기술학회 21 (21): 75-86, 2018

    4 김태국, "도로비탈면 녹화공사의 사후환경평가 방안 : 수도권지역 깎기 비탈면 현장중심으로" 단국대학교 대학원 2014

    5 전태수, "도로비탈면 녹화 시험시공지 평가방법 개선에 관한 연구 : 비탈면 녹화 설계 및 시공 잠정 지침을 중심으로" 단국대학교 대학원 2009

    6 이병준, "고속도로 절·성토 비탈면 녹화 공법의 적용 실태 분석 연구" 단국대학교 대학원 2006

    7 송민태, "고속도로 비탈면 유형에 따른 경관 선호도 분석" 한양대학교 공학대학원 2010

    8 Kang TB, "The Improvement of Slope Standards for Ecological Revegetation According to Soil Properties" Dankook University 2017

    9 Kim EB, "Study on the Ebaluation Methods by Monitoring on Revegetation Testbeds of Roadside Slope" Dankook University 2019

    10 Kim NC, "Nature Restoration and Rehabilitation" Bo Moon Dang 2010

    1 김남춘, "화강풍화토 흙깎기 비탈면 녹화공법 선정 방안 연구" 한국환경복원기술학회 19 (19): 121-135, 2016

    2 전기성, "폐도로 생태복원을 위한 시험시공지 평가 연구 - 경부선 영동군 황간지역 시험시공지에 대한 시공 후 7년 시점의 추적조사 -" 한국환경복원기술학회 19 (19): 47-57, 2016

    3 김태국, "도로비탈면 녹화공사의 사후환경평가 항목 제언" 한국환경복원기술학회 21 (21): 75-86, 2018

    4 김태국, "도로비탈면 녹화공사의 사후환경평가 방안 : 수도권지역 깎기 비탈면 현장중심으로" 단국대학교 대학원 2014

    5 전태수, "도로비탈면 녹화 시험시공지 평가방법 개선에 관한 연구 : 비탈면 녹화 설계 및 시공 잠정 지침을 중심으로" 단국대학교 대학원 2009

    6 이병준, "고속도로 절·성토 비탈면 녹화 공법의 적용 실태 분석 연구" 단국대학교 대학원 2006

    7 송민태, "고속도로 비탈면 유형에 따른 경관 선호도 분석" 한양대학교 공학대학원 2010

    8 Kang TB, "The Improvement of Slope Standards for Ecological Revegetation According to Soil Properties" Dankook University 2017

    9 Kim EB, "Study on the Ebaluation Methods by Monitoring on Revegetation Testbeds of Roadside Slope" Dankook University 2019

    10 Kim NC, "Nature Restoration and Rehabilitation" Bo Moon Dang 2010

    11 Koo MK, "Establishment of Restoration Targets and Improvements of Seed Composition in Road-Sloples" Dankook University 2018

    12 Clewell A. F., "Ecological Restoration" Island Press 2013

    13 Ministry of Construction & Transportation, "Design on Slopes Revegetation and Tentative Instruction on Construction Work" 2005

    14 Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, "Design and Construction guidelines for revegetation of the road cut-slope"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-06-09 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국환경복원녹화기술학회 -> 한국환경복원기술학회
    영문명 : The Korea Society For Environmental Restoration And Revegetation Technology -> The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology
    KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-03-21 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지 -> 한국환경복원기술학회지
    외국어명 : Journal of the Korea Society for Environmental Restoration and Revegetation Technology -> Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology
    KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.35 0.35 0.39
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.41 0.42 0.458 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼