http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 주제어 : 윤리와 과학의 양립가능성 (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
동물윤리와 과학적 창의성 사이의 정합적 관계 : 동물행동학을 중심으로
하대청 이화여자대학교 생명의료법연구소 2009 생명윤리정책연구 Vol.3 No.3
How can the attention to bioethics be compatible with the pursue of scientific creativity and productivity? In this article, I explore the possibility of this compatibility through the redefinition of scientific practices. The dominant discourses in animal ethics haven’t taken scientific practices into account seriously even if it contributed much to understanding animal rights. I examine major points made by STS scholars, Bruno Latour, Isabelle Stengers and Vincianne Despret, Donna Haraway, which I call ‘practical epistemology.’ From those works, I try to reconfigure what scientific practices really are and should be, which is summarized as these four themes; (1) From representation to re-presentation (2) from ‘disinterested’ to ‘interesting’ (3) from ‘true’ to ‘articulated’ (4) from judges to care-takers. And then I show that these themes in this practical epistemology apply well to several researches in ethology, such as McClintock’s study of rat, Rowell’s sheep, Pepperberg’s parrot. I also argue that this practical epistemology can channel animal ethics into its adjustment toward the attention to scientific practices, becomings of animals and humans, companionship between them. Most important, thanks to this practical epistemology, one doesn’t have to only choose between ethics and science but can choose both. In the end, I introduce my personal experience of an animal research in a laboratory and carefully suggest that animal ethics in the context of invasive animal researches can also obtain some insight from this practical epistemology.
스콜라연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
