http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
인문성과 문본성, 그 편재적 성격 : 한국 인문학의 새로운 구상
정대현 이화여자대학교 이화인문과학원 2015 탈경계인문학 Vol.8 No.2
The so-called “crisis of the humanities” can be understood in terms of an asymmetry between the natural and social sciences on the one hand and the humanities on the other. While the sciences approach topics related to human experience in quantificational or experimental terms, the humanities often turn to ancient texts in the search for truths about human experience. As both of these approaches have their own unique limitations, overcoming or rectifying the asymmetry between them is desirable. The present article seeks to do just that by advancing and defending the following two claims: a) that the humanities are ubiquitous wherever language is used, and b) that anything that can be experienced by humans is in need of interpretation. Two arguments are presented in support of these claims. The first argument concerns the nature of questions, which are fundamental marks or manifestations of human language. All questions are ultimately attempts to find alternative meanings or interpretations of what is presented. As such, in questioning phenomena, one seeks to transcend the oppression of imposed structures and in doing so reveals one’s humanity. Second, all phenomena are textual in nature: that which astrophysicists find in distant galaxies or which cognitive neuroscientists find in the structures of the human brain are no less in need of interpretation than the dialogues of Plato or the poems of Homer. Texts are ubiquitous. The implications of these two arguments are identified and discussed in this article. In particular, the ubiquity of humanity and textuality points to a view of human nature that is neither individualistic nor collectivist, but rather integrational in suggesting that the realization of oneself is inseparable from the realization of all others (成己成物).
김월회 이화여자대학교 이화인문과학원 2009 탈경계 인문학 Vol.2 No.2
In this paper, I try to inquire whether 'inter-disciplinary studies' can be possible through the integration of humanities and social science. Although the long efforts has been exerted to construct inter-disciplinary studies academically and institutionally, I claim that inter-disciplinary perspective is still needed to solve several problems. In other words, some issues can be approached more fruitfully through inter-disciplinary perspectives. For instance, the lack of communication, usually depicted as the absence of "three communication(三通)," is one of the urgent issues. In addition, various issues such as the human alienation from knowledge, the necessity for plausible plan for 'post-university' implies the need for integrative effort. Put simply, we need inter-disciplinary studies as 'prescription' for current issues more than ever. Based on this perspective, first of all, I deal with inter-disciplinary studies at the level of integration of knowledge, and then I discuss the dynamic nature of humanity in chapter 3 and 4. Later, I also examine 'articulated' integration between humanities(人文學), social science and humanity(人文) in the same chapters. "Liberal arts as a meta-disciplinary studies" in chapter 5 denotes a certain mode of knowledge attained through the articulated integration work. Liberal arts can be referred to as scheme to vary the tendency that the discussions on inter-disciplinary studies. At the same time, they are practical strategies to achieve the aim of inter-disciplinary studies. I argue that the following three schemes are preconditions for constructing liberal arts as a meta-major: abolishing conventional and ideologic hierarchy between liberal arts and major or between education and research; integrating emotion and reason; constructing the realm of inter-disciplinary liberal arts to make liberal arts as a meta-major. More specifically, concerning the third scheme, I propose 'creating the meta-text system which utilizes existing texts' and 'writing teaching materials and educational books which deal with inter-disciplinary knowledge' as a practical method.
정대현 이화여자대학교 이화인문과학원 2020 탈경계인문학 Vol.13 No.2
21세기에 맞고 있는 제4차 산업의 변혁은 로봇이 인간 주체성에 손상을 줄 수 있는계기에 열려있다. 과거의 인문학이 인간 주체성을 위해 주어진 질서의 교양을 위해 고전이해를 해야 했다면, 미래의 인문학은 인간이 온전히 주체적이기 위해 로봇을 인간의 조력자로 한정하는 선제적 인문학일 것을 요청한다. 이 요청에 부응하여 이 연구는 <로봇은 놀고 사람은 노는 세계의 인문학은 어떤 것인가?>의 물음을 조명하고자 한다. 이를 위해 “로봇은 즐길 수 없기 때문에 놀 수 없지만 계산할수 있기 때문에 일할 수 있다”;“ 사람은 빅데이타에 로봇보다 접근하기 어렵지만즐길 수 있으므로 놀 수 있다”;“ 놀이는 인문적 꿈이 지향해 왔던 인간의 본질적 자유의 활동이다”의 세 명제의 개연성을 보이고자 한다.
융복합 교양교과목 <코로나 인문예술치료학>의 개발 연구
윤미영 이화여자대학교 이화인문과학원 2021 탈경계인문학 Vol.14 No.2
As COVID-19 continues for a long time, a study has found that depression among young people in their 20s has reached a dangerous level. Although the Ministry of Education has announced a plan to support the mental health of college students in connection with the curriculum, the development of contents that can overcome COVID-19 and develop literacy skills for establishing new values is insignificant in the reality of universities. In this regard, it is very appropriate to develop and study subjects to provide standards for overcoming the corona pandemic situation and the direction for university students to move forward in the post-corona era. <Corona Humanities and Arts Therapy> is a combination of medical science and humanities that can be approached in an interdisciplinary way and has strategic conditions optimized for understanding this situation and finding alternatives. The purpose of this study is to apply it to classes as a design following the ‘realization of borderless education’ that emphasizes convergence and student experience.