http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Thomas B Casale,Vesselin V Dimov 대한천식알레르기학회 2010 Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research Vol.2 No.4
New information regarding the molecular mechanisms of allergic disorders has led to a variety of novel therapeutic approaches. This article briefly reviews the pathogenesis of asthma and allergic diseases, discusses the rationale behind using immunomodulators in these diseases; and examines the therapeutic effects of immunomodulators on allergic diseases. There are a number of immunomodulators that have been developed for the treatment of allergic disorders. Some have looked very promising in pre-clinical trials, but have not shown significant benefits in human clinical trials thus indicating the disparity between mouse models and human asthma. This review focuses on immunomodulators that are in human clinical trials and not molecules in pre-clinical development.
Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines—2016 revision
Broż,ek, Jan L.,Bousquet, Jean,Agache, Ioana,Agarwal, Arnav,Bachert, Claus,Bosnic-Anticevich, Sinthia,Brignardello-Petersen, Romina,Canonica, G. Walter,Casale, Thomas,Chavannes, Niels H.,Correia Elsevier 2017 The journal of allergy and clinical immunology Vol.140 No.4
<P><B>Background</B></P> <P>Allergic rhinitis (AR) affects 10% to 40% of the population. It reduces quality of life and school and work performance and is a frequent reason for office visits in general practice. Medical costs are large, but avoidable costs associated with lost work productivity are even larger than those incurred by asthma. New evidence has accumulated since the last revision of the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines in 2010, prompting its update.</P> <P><B>Objective</B></P> <P>We sought to provide a targeted update of the ARIA guidelines.</P> <P><B>Methods</B></P> <P>The ARIA guideline panel identified new clinical questions and selected questions requiring an update. We performed systematic reviews of health effects and the evidence about patients' values and preferences and resource requirements (up to June 2016). We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence-to-decision frameworks to develop recommendations.</P> <P><B>Results</B></P> <P>The 2016 revision of the ARIA guidelines provides both updated and new recommendations about the pharmacologic treatment of AR. Specifically, it addresses the relative merits of using oral H<SUB>1</SUB>-antihistamines, intranasal H<SUB>1</SUB>-antihistamines, intranasal corticosteroids, and leukotriene receptor antagonists either alone or in combination. The ARIA guideline panel provides specific recommendations for the choice of treatment and the rationale for the choice and discusses specific considerations that clinicians and patients might want to review to choose the management most appropriate for an individual patient.</P> <P><B>Conclusions</B></P> <P>Appropriate treatment of AR might improve patients' quality of life and school and work productivity. ARIA recommendations support patients, their caregivers, and health care providers in choosing the optimal treatment.</P>