http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Sophia Everett (검색결과 3 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS IN BULK PORTS
Sophia Everett 인하대학교 정석물류통상연구원 2008 인하대학교 정석물류통상연구원 학술대회 Vol.2008 No.3
The resources boom has led to rapid growth in demand for Australian coal and iron ore. Export infrastructure, however, has not kept pace with the increased demand. As a result serious congestion is occurring in major bulk ports in Australia. Ship queues up to seventy at anyone time for a period of up to 21 days off the port of Hay Point is incurring high demurrage costs. Similar experiences are occurring in the port of Newcastle. This has led to a dilemma in respect of infrastructure expansion and provision with serious implications for ongoing efficiency in global supply chains. Who has the responsibility for upgrade and expansion in the new world order of privatisation. In the past this was the responsibility of governments or of the privately owned terminal operators when operations were vertically and horizontally integrated into production processes and exports. Congestion issues are also emerging in the iron ore areas of the Pilbara where regulation policy is determining that privately owned rail infrastructure be declared open for third party access. This has serious implications for the efficiency of the company"s production process and global supply chains. This paper will unravel some of the difficulties associated with infrastructure expansion and provision of export facilities. Who has the responsibility to take action? What action can be enforced to ensure that solutions are put in place. Can government enforce that owners of privatised facilities undertake expansion on a timely basis when this is not a lease? The paper will discuss some regulatory constraints and impact on export supply chains.
-
Sophia EVERETT,Ross ROBINSONE 인하대학교 정석물류통상연구원 2012 JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS AND TRADE Vol.10 No.3
Recently, the entry of new players has prompted significant restructuring in the Australian coal market with value migrating away from the existing fragmented, traditional production/export model characterised by competing operators generally using "common user" infrastructure facilities to new, fully integrated supply chains creating a multi-tiered production-consumer framework. This paper argues that not only are coal markets restructuring but they are doing so within the framework of a significant paradigm shift towards efficiency-seeking and efficiency-driven mechanisms. Value innovation and a deregulated market are enabling operators to enter the industry seeking and implementing end-to-end control of the supply chain - and, in so doing, capturing the significant gains of integration. This paper explores these changes within the framework of integrative efficiency - a product of end-to-end control by a single party, derived from a number of companies, or chain elements, working cooperatively rather than competitively, or a single operator vertically integrating the chain from point of production to point of consumption to capture and deliver significantly higher value. The paper focuses attention on this paradigmatic shift in a brief though detailed case study of a major new industry entrant into export coal chains from the rapidly developing Galilee Basin in northern Queensland. It examines the dynamics and implications of this shift in the context of chain efficiency and value innovation.
-
Supply chain security initiatives: The authorized economic operator and Indonesia"s experience
Dicky Hadi Pratama,Sophia Everett 인하대학교 정석물류통상연구원 2017 JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS AND TRADE Vol.15 No.1
Discussion of security in supply chains has been intensified since the tragedy of 9/11 in the United States. The World Customs Organization"s SAFE Framework with its Authorized Economic Operators (AEO) program is one of the prominent supply chain security initiatives. At the time of its introduction in 2005, 168 member countries signed their support for its implementation. However, the last AEO Compendium reports only 69 countries currently have AEO program in place. This relatively slow development indicates the complexity of issues that might challenge countries to implement the initiative. Against this background, this paper aims to look at the AEO implementation in an environment where supply chain security initiative is relatively new. It focuses on policy development perspectives where the case study of Indonesia might represent challenges of other countries. Involving methods of desk research, interviews, and field observation, this paper starts with the development of various international supply chain security programs where the AEO finds it prominence. It follows with a discussion on the Indonesian AEO implementation where challenges and its policy development process are explored.
KCI연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
