RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        Artificial Intelligence Applications in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Care: Focus on Machine Learning Methods

        Shahabeddin Abhari,Sharareh R. Niakan Kalhori,Mehdi Ebrahimi,Hajar Hasannejadasl,Ali Garavand 대한의료정보학회 2019 Healthcare Informatics Research Vol.25 No.4

        Objectives: The incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus has increased significantly in recent years. With the development of artificial intelligence applications in healthcare, they are used for diagnosis, therapeutic decision making, and outcome prediction, especially in type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study aimed to identify the artificial intelligence (AI) applications for type 2 diabetes mellitus care. Methods: This is a review conducted in 2018. We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase scientific databases, based on a combination of related mesh terms. The article selection process was based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Finally, 31 articles were selected after inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Data gathering was done by using a data extraction form. Data were summarized and reported based on the study objectives. Results: The main applications of AI for type 2 diabetes mellitus care were screening and diagnosis in different stages. Among all of the reviewed AI methods, machine learning methods with 71% (n = 22) were the most commonly applied techniques. Many applications were in multi method forms (23%). Among the machine learning algorithms applications, support vector machine (21%) and naive Bayesian (19%) were the most commonly used methods. The most important variables that were used in the selected studies were body mass index, fasting blood sugar, blood pressure, HbA1c, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, and demographic variables. Conclusions: It is recommended to select optimal algorithms by testing various techniques. Support vector machine and naive Bayesian might achieve better performance than other applications due to the type of variables and targets in diabetes-related outcomes classification.

      • KCI등재

        Mobile Health Technology and Healthcare Providers: Systemic Barriers to Adoption

        Somayyeh Zakerabasali,Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh,Tayebeh Baniasadi,Azita Yazdani,Shahabeddin Abhari 대한의료정보학회 2021 Healthcare Informatics Research Vol.27 No.4

        Objectives: Despite the growing use of mobile health (mHealth), certain barriers seem to be hindering the use of mHealthapplications in healthcare. This article presents a systematic review of the literature on barriers associated with mHealthreported by healthcare professionals. Methods: This systematic review was carried out to identify studies published fromJanuary 2015 to December 2019 by searching four electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, andGoogle Scholar). Studies were included if they reported perceived barriers to the adoption of mHealth from healthcare providers’perspectives. Content analysis and categorization of barriers were performed based on a focus group discussion thatexplored researchers’ knowledge and experiences. Results: Among the 273 papers retrieved through the search strategy, 18works were selected and 18 barriers were identified. The relevant barriers were categorized into three main groups: technical,individual, and healthcare system. Security and privacy concerns from the category of technical barriers, knowledge andlimited literacy from the category of individual barriers, and economic and financial factors from the category of healthcaresystem barriers were chosen as three of the most important challenges related to the adoption of mHealth described in the includedpublications. Conclusions: mHealth adoption is a complex and multi-dimensional process that is widely implementedto increase access to healthcare services. However, it is influenced by various factors and barriers. Understanding the barriersto adoption of mHealth applications among providers, and engaging them in the adoption process will be important for thesuccessful deployment of these applications.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼