RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • Meeting the American Dietetic Association's competency requirement, working knowledge of environmental issues related to food: A survey of programs in dietetics

        Rouder, Clifford Columbia University Teachers College 2000 해외박사(DDOD)

        RANK : 247343

        The American Dietetic Association (ADA) has required that ADA-approved dietetics programs provide students with a <italic>working knowledge of environmental issues related to food</italic>. Because this requirement is new to the dietetics curriculum, a questionnaire was developed to describe programs' current and intended depth of coverage (basic knowledge level or working knowledge level) of environment-food issues. Twenty-two environment and food-related topic areas were synthesized from reviews of current literature. Courses that were used to cover the topic areas, as well as opinions about the new requirement were also assessed. The questionnaire was pilot-tested for face and content validity, and test-retest reliability and internal consistency reliability were established. The questionnaire was sent to directors of all 267 ADA-approved dietetics programs. A series of follow-up mailings and phone calls were then employed. The response rate was 71.9%. Approximately half of directors (54%) were not currently covering any of the topic areas at the working knowledge level; approximately two-fifths (38%) did not intend to cover any of the topic areas at this level. More programs were currently covering the topic areas at the basic knowledge level (25%–65%) than at the working knowledge level (1%–21%). Environmental issues related to food production, transportation, disposal, and legislation, as well as ethical and philosophical perspectives of examination were among those least covered by programs at any level. The majority of programs (50%–70%) did not intend to change their current level of coverage. Of the directors who did intend to change, the biggest change was from no coverage to coverage at the basic knowledge level (approximately 5%–30%). Nutrients, foods, and community nutrition courses were used most frequently to cover the topic areas. Two-thirds of directors had favorable opinions regarding the competency, although about half lacked adequate resources to meet the competency. The profession has taken an important first step by mandating this new requirement. However, if dietetics professionals are to fully engage in shaping an environmentally sustainable food system, then dietetics students will need to be provided with both increased breadth and increased depth of coverage of these topic areas.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼