http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Pekkanen, Juha (검색결과 3 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Letter to the Study by Hyvönen et al. on Moisture Damage and MCS
Pekkanen, Juha,Karjalainen, Jussi,Lampi, Jussi Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute 2020 Safety and health at work Vol.11 No.3
Due to the significant methodological problems in the empirical part of the paper and the very selective literature review, the conclusions of the paper are mostly unsupported.
-
After the Developmental State: Civil Society in Japan
Robert Pekkanen 동아시아연구원 2004 Journal of East Asian Studies Vol.4 No.3
This article contends that a quiescent civil society comprised an important element of the Japanese developmental state in the past. Moreover, the very success of the developmental state brought Japan to a new level of affluence. In turn, this led to the increasing prominence of civil society organizations, which is corrosive to the very political insulation requisite for the developmental state. The article makes three specific arguments here with evidence. First, civil society groups are proliferating in Japan. Second, the type of groups that are appearing most rapidly are different—with the greatest growth in the type of groups that particularly emphasize their independence from the state bureaucracy. Third, civil society groups are beginning to flex their muscles, particularly in forging new relationships with political parties (especially the Democratic Party of Japan) and in certain policy areas (such as welfare). Caveats apply; such growth will take time, and many continuities exist from the heyday of the developmental state. However, the trends identified above will very likely continue in the medium term.
-
Bilateralism, Multilateralism, or Regionalism? Japan's Trade Forum Choices
Saadia M. Pekkanen 동아시아연구원 2005 Journal of East Asian Studies Vol.5 No.1
The Japanese government today is actively and strategically choosing among various institutional forums to deal with its trade partners, namely bilateral venues, multilateral settings, and even preferential regional arrangements. This ongoing high-profile institutional selection is somewhat unprecedented for Japan, and demands a review of the historical and analytical reasons that drive decisionmakers to select one forum over another. Overall, the Japanese case suggests that the aggregate trade forum choices are influenced both by the desire to institutionalize mechanisms for stabilizing a range of expectations and by the necessity of guaranteeing market access and protection of investment in the fastest time possible.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
