http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : OLIHA Charles Dickens Imene (검색결과 1 건)
-
OLIHA Charles Dickens Imene 韓國外國語大學校 國際地域大學院 2013 국내석사
The purpose of this study is to test whether the principles of the Paris Declaration are really important in promoting economic growth with aid (official development assistance: ODA). Among the major principles of the Paris Declaration are ownership and results oriented aid management, which is represented by the existence of an assessment framework. This study focuses on these two principles as a proxy for the Paris Declaration. This proxy has been used in the devised model following the findings of Burnside and Dollar (2000) and Collier and Dollar (2002) through the use of good economic policies such as fiscal monetary, trade and Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA). The finding of this study shows that, firstly on the one hand, when CPIA interacted with ODA, the result statistically shows its significant impact on both per capita gross domestic product (GDP) and growth rates of per capita GDP. But CPIA alone does not have influence on the dependent variables in a statistically significant way. Secondly, an ownership and assessment framework variables do not make statistically significant influence on per capita GDP or growth rates of per capita GDP, either independently or when interacted with aid (ODA). This interpretation comes from the fact that, on the one hand, Model (i) and (iii), respectively do not include the CPIA, but include only an ownership and assessment framework in interaction with aid. Consequently, these variables are statistically insignificant in explaining economic growth or GDP per capita. And these two Paris Declaration (PD) variables are statistically insignificant in explaining economic growth or GDP per capita. This means that the PD variables alone do not explain the variations in either per capita GDP or growth rates of GDP. On the other hand, model (ii) and (iv) do include the CPIA and CPIA * aid (Country Policy and Institutional Assessment multiplied (*) by ODA), together with an ownership and an assessment framework variables. The estimation results show that CPIA, in interaction with aid, influences the dependent variables in a statistically significant manner. However, an ownership and an assessment framework alone or in interaction with aid do not influence the dependent variables. This means that while CPIA explains the variations in the dependent variables, the PD variables do not complement the CPIA in explaining the variations in dependent variables. Therefore this study concludes that the two PD variables (i.e. an ownership and an assessment framework variables neither replace nor complement the CPIA variables. In other words, the policy and institution of aid recipient countries are important in explaining the aid’s impact on per capita GDP or its growth rates. However, this study cannot states that the PD variables are equally important in explaining the aid’s impact on per capita GDP or its growth rates.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
