http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Milord, Steve (검색결과 3 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
AL A. Ávila Milord,María M. Aguilar Hernández,Roberta Demichelis Gómez 대한혈액학회 2018 Blood Research Vol.53 No.3
Background Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTCL) has a high prevalence in Asia and Latin American countries, such as Mexico, where it encompasses 40% of all T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Historically, responses to anthracycline-based therapies have been disappointing. Since data about the effectiveness of L-asparaginase-based regimens in Mexico are limited, we compared both therapies in our center. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort of patients with newly diagnosed ENKTCL, who were divided into two groups for treatment and analysis (group 1: L-asparaginase-based regimen and group 2: anthracycline-based regimen) between 2001 and 2016. Results Of 36 patients with newly-diagnosed ENKTCL, 33 received at least one cycle of chemo-therapy (22 in group 1 and 11 in group 2). Over a median follow-up interval of 17 months (range, 0‒167), a complete response (CR) was observed in 45.5% of patients in group 1, compared to 27% of group 2 (P=0.45). Progression was more frequently observed in group 2 than in group 1 (54.5% vs. 18.4%, P=0.04). The median overall survival (OS) was 44 months in group 1, compared to 5 months in group 2 (P=0.012). The multivariate analysis showed that failure to achieve a CR after first-line therapy was the only significant factor for OS (HR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.4‒6.5; P=0.005). Conclusion L-asparaginase-based regimens for patients with newly-diagnosed ENKTCL confer a sur-vival advantage over anthracycline-based regimens.
-
AL A. Ávila Milord,María M. Aguilar Hernández,Roberta Demichelis Gómez 대한혈액학회 2018 Blood Research Vol.53 No.3
Background Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTCL) has a high prevalence in Asia and Latin American countries, such as Mexico, where it encompasses 40% of all T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Historically, responses to anthracycline-based therapies have been disappointing. Since data about the effectiveness of L-asparaginase-based regimens in Mexico are limited, we compared both therapies in our center. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort of patients with newly diagnosed ENKTCL, who were divided into two groups for treatment and analysis (group 1: L-asparaginase-based regimen and group 2: anthracycline-based regimen) between 2001 and 2016. Results Of 36 patients with newly-diagnosed ENKTCL, 33 received at least one cycle of chemo-therapy (22 in group 1 and 11 in group 2). Over a median follow-up interval of 17 months (range, 0‒167), a complete response (CR) was observed in 45.5% of patients in group 1, compared to 27% of group 2 (P=0.45). Progression was more frequently observed in group 2 than in group 1 (54.5% vs. 18.4%, P=0.04). The median overall survival (OS) was 44 months in group 1, compared to 5 months in group 2 (P=0.012). The multivariate analysis showed that failure to achieve a CR after first-line therapy was the only significant factor for OS (HR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.4‒6.5; P=0.005). Conclusion L-asparaginase-based regimens for patients with newly-diagnosed ENKTCL confer a sur-vival advantage over anthracycline-based regimens.
-
Chah, Neysan,Jones, Mike,Milord, Steve,Al-Eryani, Kamal,Enciso, Reyes The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2021 Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Vol.21 No.5
Background: Migraine headaches are the second leading cause of disability worldwide and are responsible for significant morbidity, reduction in the quality of life, and loss of productivity on a global scale. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of ketamine on migraines and other primary headache disorders compared to placebo and other active interventions, such as midazolam, metoclopramide/diphenhydramine, and prochlorperazine/diphenhydramine. Methods: An electronic search of databases published up to February 2021, including Medline via PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, a hand search of the bibliographies of the included studies, as well as literature and systematic reviews found through the search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating ketamine in the treatment of migraine/headache disorders compared to the placebo. The authors assessed the risk of bias according to the Cochrane Handbook guidelines. Results: The initial search strategy yielded 398 unduplicated references, which were independently assessed by three review authors. After evaluation, this number was reduced to five RCTs (two unclear risk of bias and three high risk of bias). The total number of patients in all the studies was 193. Due to the high risk of bias, small sample size, heterogeneity of the outcomes reported, and heterogeneity of the comparison groups, the quality of the evidence was very low. One RCT reported that intranasal ketamine was superior to intranasal midazolam in improving the aura attack severity, but not duration, while another reported that intranasal ketamine was not superior to metoclopramide and diphenhydramine in reducing the headache severity. In one trial, subcutaneous ketamine was superior to saline in migraine severity reduction; however, intravenous (I.V.) ketamine was inferior to I.V. prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine in another study. Conclusion: Further double-blind controlled studies are needed to assess the efficacy of ketamine in treating acute and chronic refractory migraines and other primary headaches using intranasal and subcutaneous routes. These studies should include a long-term follow-up and different ketamine dosages in diagnosed patients following international standards for diagnosing headache/migraine.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
