http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Levi McNeil (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
( Mcneil,Levi ) 한국외국어대학교 외국어교육연구소 2015 외국어교육연구 Vol.29 No.2
Many teachers know that their students participate in various online communities (OCs). In OCs, popular media, such as sitcoms, books, and digital games serve as focal points for an array of complex activity, ranging from discussion and debate to user-made videos and art. What some teachers may not realize is that this type of activities can facilitate foreign-and second language learning. Thus, one goal of the current study was to describe critical features of OCs from a situated learning and a digital literacies perspective, highlighting multimodal meaning making and social practice. Additionally, to move beyond language practice and support participation as social practice, researchers are beginning to explore ways to integrate OCs into the language curriculum. However, there currently exist relatively few discussions and examples in the literature to assist teachers in implementing OCs into instruction. To address this issue, the current study drew from a technology implementation framework to propose three models to guide the use of OCs in Korean educational contexts. Each model presented was discussed in regards to four considerations-how to: (1) identify "good" online communities; (2) relate community activities to curriculum objectives; (3) encourage participation; and (4) assess community involvement and language learning. (199)
-
Levi McNeil,Heshim Song 한국외국어교육학회 2016 Foreign languages education Vol.23 No.2
This study investigated peer-to-peer interaction during collaborative, computer-mediated reading tasks. Fourteen university EFL students in Korea worked in pairs to complete three gapfill tasks. The transcript data from these tasks were analyzed to determine: (1) how often collaboration occurs during collaborative reading tasks, (2) the ways in which peers help each other, and (3) how successful peers are in resolving the problems they collaboratively pursue. The results showed that each of these aspects of interaction varied among sets of pairs. On average, however, the participants collaborated to jointly solve 75% of the problems they encountered. They also used a range of helping behaviors during collaboration. While the participants correctly resolved nearly half of the problems they attempted, half were incorrectly answered or unresolved. Based on these findings, pedagogical implications are offered, in addition to suggestions for future research into collaborative reading tasks.
KCI연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
