http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Husam A Mohamad (검색결과 3 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Democracy Promotion in Arab Politics
Husam A Mohamad 서울대학교 국제학연구소 2007 Journal of International and Area Studies Vol.14 No.2
The first part of this essay explores features and factors pertaining to democratic ideas, ideals and procedures in general and the limits of their applicability in the Arab world in particular. The second part assesses the persistence of the U.S. credibility problem in the Arab world, which became more evident after the George W. Bush Administration began advancing its democracy promotion plans for the ""Greater Middle East"" region. Although it remained largely symbolic, the Administration"s focus on democratization has, directly or indirectly, played a contributory role in strengthening the status of autocratic Arab regimes that support U.S. policy and interests, while hindering the stability of regimes that remain opposed to the U.S. and its allies in the region. In general, the article aims at examining factors and events that have contributed to the deleterious effects of U.S. policy on democratization in the Arab world. More specifically, it argues that the Bush Administration"s rhetoric on democracy promotion, which strengthened the status of pro-U.S. regimes in the Arab world, has also contributed to empowering Islamists" popular appeal along with hampering the U.S."s credibility, public image and prestige across the region.
-
The Peace Process and the Palestinian Political Landscape
Husam A. Mohamad 서울대학교 국제학연구소 2007 Journal of International and Area Studies Vol.14 No.1
This article examines forces and events that have influenced the Palestinian political landscape over the past two decades, focusing, among other things, on the failure of the peace process and its effect on the changing relations among political elites and trends in the Palestinian occupied territories. While reflecting on the prospects for peacemaking between Israel and the Palestinians, from the start of the 1987 Intifada until the eruption of the second Intifada in 2000, this article will highlight factors that have contributed to the collapse of the Oslo Accords, the Camp David II Summit and the Road Map formula. The obstacles that have generally caused the failure of these peace plans include the continuation of Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories, the U.S.’s credibility problem in the region and the growing corruption attributed to the Palestinian Authority.
-
President George W. Bush’s Legacy on the Israeli-Palestinian “Peace Process”
Husam Mohamad 서울대학교 국제학연구소 2015 Journal of International and Area Studies Vol.22 No.1
Following the events of September 11, President George W. Bush shifted his approach in support of further involvement in Middle Eastern affairs. He delivered, on June 24, 2002, a speech in support of the creation of “a peaceful and democratic” Palestinian state alongside Israel. Bush specifically asked the Palestinians to reform the Palestinian Authority, dismantle their militant groups and elect a new leader. Bush also backed the Quartet’s Road Map formula (sponsored by the U.N., the E.U., and Russia) for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Although Bush’s vision and the Road Map plan marked a new shift in U.S. policy on the Palestinian issue, both failed to exercise leverage upon Israel to withdraw from the Palestinian territories. They failed to provide details concerning the final status issues, including the future of Jerusalem, the refugees, Jewish settlements, statehood and borders, which served to satisfy Israel’s objection to packaged deals that may entail pressures for withdrawal from the Palestinian territories. While exploring factors, events and forces that may have motivated Bush’s plans for the region, this article will underline the main themes of his two states idea and those of the Road Map’s formula. It also examines signs of inconsistencies and fluctuations in Bush’s policies towards the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, along with comparing Bush’s rhetoric on the Palestinian state to the actual realities on the ground. This article seeks a historically grounded critical understanding of U.S. policy towards the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in general and the Bush Administration’s conception of the two states solution in particular. It also reflects slightly on signs of continuities and/or changes experienced during Barak Obama’s presidency with regard to the Middle East region.
KCI
스콜라연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
